24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

studyhae

木虫 (正式写手)

SEPI: 1
应助: 1 (幼儿园)
贵宾: 0.001
金币: 3511.4
散金: 215
红花: 1
帖子: 325
在线: 138.1小时
虫号: 451780
注册: 2007-11-05
专业: 河流海岸动力学与泥沙研究

[交流] 【审稿已经回来，求指点】已有13人参与

编辑来信：
Please find appended three reviews for the above referenced manuscript. *** requires a novel fundamental advancement of widespread significance, which is not evident in the submitted manuscript. The manuscript appears to have significant overlap with previously published work and has not docmented a fundamental advancement that meets the high standards of ***. I believe that it would require a significant amount of new work to do so. If you choose to submit a revised manuscript, it would be necessary to send this manuscript out for a full round of reviews. You should consider withdrawing your manuscript and submitting it to a less competitive journal.
If you decide to revise the work, please submit a list of changes or a rebuttal against each point raised by the reviewers when you submit the revised manuscript.
投稿系统：
Major Revision and Re-review
三个审稿意见：
专家1）I recommend that this paper be published after a minor revision that addresses the following concerns
专家2) My recommendation is that this work be accepted for publication, with
some attention paid to the justification of ``robustness'' and
uniqueness of the algorithm that I outline in the paragraphs above.
专家3）After a careful review, however, I am not convinced that the manuscript contains enough novelties and new contributions to the existing literature. My main concerns are.
我的问题是：不知道是否应该修改？不清楚编辑的意见。
求高手指点，多谢。

回复此楼