应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 学术交流区 » 论文投稿 » 投稿求助 » 审稿意见回来了，可是不知道接受的可能性，请大家帮忙看看
91/1返回列表
查看: 2336  |  回复: 8
只看楼主@他人 存档 新回复提醒 (忽略) 收藏    在APP中查看

iamlhy1981

铜虫 (初入文坛)

[交流] 审稿意见回来了，可是不知道接受的可能性，请大家帮忙看看已有8人参与

我初次投稿外文，好不容易等来审稿意见，可是不太好。请大家帮忙看看，应该好好修改呢？还是另寻出路？
The five reviews for your manuscript are attached. The reviewers have raised points that require significant consideration and revision of the manuscript before it is suitable for publication. However, with adequate response and revision, the manuscript may be acceptable for publication in Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. Please give careful consideration to the reviewers’ comments and revise the manuscript as may be appropriate. The revised manuscript will be returned to the reviewers for further comments. We would like to receive your revision as soon as possible, 90 days at the latest.
Reviewer: 1 Comments to the Author The language of the paper must, however, be improved. I therefore suggest that the author send the paper to someone with specific competence on how to improve the language of scientific papers.（具体意见省略）If the authors address the above questions I am willing to read the manuscript again in detail to improve its quality.
Reviewer: 2 Comments to the Author The clarity of presentation should be improved and spelling mistakes should be checked and corrected. In this paper the authors presented a novel functional tannins-immobilized chitosan resin (TICR). Absorption of BSA on TICR has been investigated by varying contact time and protein initial concentration. In addition adsorption behaviour was discussed according to Langmuir model. The manuscript presents an interesting and innovative way to fabricate low-cost material for protein removal from aqueous solutions. The technical quality of this manuscript is acceptable but need to be extended.
Reviewer: 3  This paper is not ready for publication. It does not have a useful message, important features are overlooked, the experiments make little sense and important physical principles are confused.
Reviewer: 4 This article presents a “novel functional tannins-immobilized chitosan resin (TICR)” which has potential applications in the removal of proteins from solution. The concept is illustrated with BSA. Although it is known that chitosan is a suitable material for the adsorption of proteins such as BSA, the main premise (novelty) for this manuscript is based on the improved protein uptake when chitosan is modified with tannins. Although this is a logical expectation based on the phenolic groups in tannins and the basic nature of proteins, the authors need to provide an adequate comparison between the unmodified resin (CR) and the tannins modified counterpart (TICR) in order to justify the proposed novel resin. In this comparison, one would expect that the TICR is superior to the CR. Also, it would be very useful if the authors compare their novel TICR material to existing systems such as tannins immobilized on other supports such as carbon black in terms of ability to remove proteins (e.g., BSA).
Reviewer: 5 The work presented in this paper deals with the protein adsorption properties of tannins-immobilized chitosan resin. The removal of proteins from various media is a process of great economical importance. The topic seems to be within the scope of Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. But the submitted article does not report any significant innovative research. I have not been convinced by the study of BSA adsorption. The authors seem not very familiar with this topic. The pH of adsorption is not controlled and not given. However it is one of the most important parameter to control in protein adsorption. Among the 30 references in the cited literature, only one is related to protein adsorption (ref. 27). There are about 2000 articles published each year on protein adsorption. I am sure that if the authors take the time to read some of them, they will realize that the adsorption of proteins is a much more complex phenomenon than the adsorption of Fe(II) and Fe(III) ions, which they take as example to discuss their results (ref. 20, cited line 127).
拜托大家多给意见！
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
1楼2010-11-10 12:50:08
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

biozhangliang

木虫 (小有名气)

土博士
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流
意见不错，好好改，基本就收了！
想当年，我的意见是你的5倍以上，好好改都还是收了！
赞一下(1人) 回复此楼
做好工作，做好人！
2楼2010-11-10 13:55:22
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

monster528

木虫 (正式写手)
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流
按照审稿人意见认真修改。
没有必要现在据另投它稿。
赞一下(1人) 回复此楼
3楼2010-11-10 16:05:23
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

13500558820

银虫 (文坛精英)

天蓬大元帅——天上人间董事长
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流
按照意见一条一条的改，再投
赞一下(1人) 回复此楼
皇家数理科学协会会长——小木虫MM管理办公室主任——天蓬大元帅——天上人间董事会主席——高老庄庄主——小木虫最高仲裁委员会会长
4楼2010-11-10 16:06:44
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

iamlhy1981

铜虫 (初入文坛)
谢谢大家，学习了。
赞一下 回复此楼
5楼2010-11-11 09:16:27
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wezzyl

金虫 (正式写手)
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流
However, with adequate response and revision, the manuscript may be acceptable for publication in Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research.
本文来自: 小木虫论坛 http://muchong.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=2580328
这句话说明了。
赞一下(1人) 回复此楼
6楼2010-11-11 09:33:31
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

xiaokongyu

木虫 (著名写手)
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流
五个审稿人，才这么点修改意见！基本没问题了！
赞一下(1人) 回复此楼
新手，请多多关照！谢谢啦！
7楼2010-11-11 09:47:43
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

理工光学

木虫 (正式写手)
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流
是不是标准的修改后,考虑录用的稿件
赞一下(1人) 回复此楼
8楼2010-11-11 09:56:19
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

xuleilei08

至尊木虫 (著名写手)
很有希望！
回复此楼
9楼2010-11-11 11:01:07
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 iamlhy1981 的主题更新
91/1返回列表
普通表情 龙 兔 虎 猫 高级回复(可上传附件)
信息提示
关闭
请填处理意见
关闭