24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1705  |  回复: 3

guaiguaishu

银虫 (初入文坛)

[交流] 牛人帮我看一下,编辑这是什么意思已有2人参与

文章返回修改,在审稿人意见下面,是editor report,原文如下:
Editors' report:

An "X" has been placed before the paragraph that you need to take into consideration.

1. Review Articles should present a thorough and comprehensive overview of the chosen subject and be extensively referenced and comprise around 8000 words. Authors are expected to go beyond a simple compilation of references and analyse trends, shortcomings and accomplishments in their chosen field, charting possible future directions of the research. Illustrations and summary tables are encouraged. Flexibility of presentation is permitted, but authors are urged to arrange the subject matter clearly under the general headings of Abstract, Keywords, Introduction, Main text (The heading and the sub-headings of the main text are left to author's discretion), Summary and Conclusions, Future Perspectives, Acknowledgements, References.

2. Full papers should be complete descriptions of full investigations comprising around 5000 words with up to 6 single figures/tables/schemes in total, but your manuscript is too long or comprises too many figures/tables/schemes. You could use the supplemental information feature for extra figures/tables/. Supplementary files supplied will be published online alongside the electronic version of your article in Elsevier Science web products, but will not appear in the printed issue. You can find the details at http://ees.elsevier.com/bios/

3. We would consider your revised manuscript for publication as a Short Communication. It should be complete descriptions of original limited investigations comprising around 3000 words with up to three single figures/tables/schemes. Alternatively, you could use the supplemental information feature for extra figures/tables/schemes. Supplementary files supplied will be published online alongside the electronic version of your article in Elsevier Science web products, but will not appear in the printed issue. You can find the details at http://ees.elsevier.com/bios/

4. Most referees still prefer to read hard copy when they review your manuscript. In order to aid referees in printing you are strongly recommended to make your manuscript text compact and to check that it will print out in a convenient format.

5. Please rewrite the Abstract. In general, the abstract is a condensation of the information (facts) in the paper (150-250 words) and should present briefly and clearly the methods of the research and the principal results.

6. A maximum of six keywords should be given below the Abstract to describe the contents of the paper.

7. The Results and Discussion section needs to be expanded. The Results and Discussion should deals with the interpretation of the results in the light of previously published findings and must be clearly presented.

8. Please add the Conclusions section. It must be fully supported by the results reported and should include the major conclusions, the limitations of the work and the future work.

9. Please rewrite the Conclusions.
9.1 The Conclusions section is too long. It should be kept short and must be fully supported by the results reported.
9.2 The Conclusions section is not sound. It should include the major conclusions, the limitations of the work and the future work.

10. Please do not place a list of abbreviations in the text. Do not use an abbreviation without explaining it beforehand. The first time the word/phrase is introduced, put the abbreviation in brackets after the word/phrase.

11. In order to demonstrate the repeatability/reproducibility of the method authors are asked to include Error Bars in figures, and relative standard deviations (RSD) or coefficient of variation (CV) in the figures captions or in the text.

12. In order to demonstrate the repeatability/reproducibility of the method authors are asked to include relative standard deviations (RSD) or coefficient of variation (CV) in Tables.

13. We strongly suggest you to find a native English speaker to check your manuscript.

14. Please number the headings and sub-headings of the manuscript.

15. The format of the paper is incorrect. Please correct it according to the instructions of the Guide for Authors of Biosensors and Bioelectronics at http://ees.elsevier.com/bios/.

16. The format of references is incorrect. Please correct it according to the instructions of the Guide for Authors of Biosensors and Bioelectronics at http://ees.elsevier.com/bios/. Please note it is not necessary to add the title of the publications in the list of references.

17. Please delete the title of the publications in the list of references.

18. In order for the publisher to edit your paper the article must be saved in the native format of the word processor used, e.g., Word Perfect, Microsoft Word, etc.

19. The preferred positions for all figures/tables/schemes should be indicated in the text. The figure captions should be provided on a separate sheet. Present figure captions, tables, schemes and figures in this order at the end of the article.
是有"X"的才需要修改考虑吗,可是一个"X"都没有啊,有些他提到的我都是按照要求做的,但也有些比如说图片位置我没标明,迷茫了,不知道啥意思
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

studyhae

木虫 (正式写手)

guaiguaishu(金币+1):谢谢 2010-09-26 16:19:18
X 不是指段落前面的标号吗,1 2 3...
2楼2010-09-21 16:57:14
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

daiyu18

铜虫 (初入文坛)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
你好,你的文章接收了么?我现在也有一篇修改的,跟你的编辑问题一样,我也不知道怎么回答了?你当时是怎么回答的啊?谢谢
3楼2012-03-15 10:31:39
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

allen_baobao

铁杆木虫 (职业作家)

2L正解。
Controlisahiddentechnology.——K.J.Astrom
4楼2012-03-15 14:54:47
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 guaiguaishu 的主题更新
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 工材口青年基金上会可能性 +9 今晚推荐22 2024-06-19 11/550 2024-06-20 22:30 by andywei1028
[基金申请] 刚刚收到科研之友邮件 +23 olivermiaoer 2024-06-19 32/1600 2024-06-20 22:17 by andywei1028
[硕博家园] 关于硕博连读的一些疑问? +9 Lwenter 2024-06-14 11/550 2024-06-20 21:20 by rhhua11111
[论文投稿] 求机械类四区sci推荐 5+4 迷茫小旷 2024-06-14 7/350 2024-06-20 17:42 by 不一样烟火12345
[论文投稿] 投稿求助 6+3 小短腿安琪拉 2024-06-19 4/200 2024-06-20 17:40 by 不一样烟火12345
[教师之家] 试用期辞职 +10 ZHONGWU_U 2024-06-18 17/850 2024-06-20 17:07 by ZHONGWU_U
[论文投稿] 投稿求助 +4 平凡的日子 2024-06-19 5/250 2024-06-20 16:24 by yueyueyue@
[找工作] 高校两个offer选择 +15 cowox2021 2024-06-18 16/800 2024-06-20 15:24 by ase123456
[教师之家] 每次骚扰女学生的都是院系领导,而不是普通教师,小编们要注意措辞正确 +11 zju2000 2024-06-15 13/650 2024-06-20 15:19 by ase123456
[精细化工] 切削液交流群 +5 SZ吴彦祖 2024-06-17 5/250 2024-06-20 12:10 by 毛爱波BBB
[考博] 有机化学迷茫学生 +4 佛系摸鱼5 2024-06-18 6/300 2024-06-20 10:05 by 295143924
[基金申请] 希望今年自己国自然面上项目和老婆青年项目能中! +10 恐龙爸爸 2024-06-14 10/500 2024-06-20 08:42 by jsguo4127
[海外博后] 墨尔本大学博后offer要不要接 +3 kyxblmm 2024-06-18 3/150 2024-06-19 22:39 by blake1111
[公派出国] 去英国的小伙伴儿都在哪儿租的房子呀? +7 65syn 2024-06-14 11/550 2024-06-19 10:19 by 65syn
[基金申请] 博后基金刷到的BUG,图片来的更直观 +15 carolloo 2024-06-17 16/800 2024-06-19 09:42 by msjy
[公派出国] CSC德国博后每个月资助多少呀?够用吗 +4 326lhpqk 2024-06-16 7/350 2024-06-19 02:03 by PLHOU
[论文投稿] 论文已接收,但发现修改稿传的是旧版该怎么办? +3 zsq54321 2024-06-15 6/300 2024-06-17 19:45 by wjykycg
[基金申请] 博士后创新人才支持计划公示 +9 aishida144 2024-06-14 15/750 2024-06-16 09:52 by msjy
[论文投稿] 投稿被一个审稿人恶意评审了怎么样? +5 1chen 2024-06-14 7/350 2024-06-15 23:15 by xy66xy
[基金申请] 关于博后基金的bug问题 +6 lxr1991 2024-06-14 9/450 2024-06-15 21:17 by since—2010
信息提示
请填处理意见