| 查看: 2226 | 回复: 3 | |||
guaiguaishu银虫 (初入文坛)
|
[交流]
牛人帮我看一下,编辑这是什么意思 已有2人参与
|
|
文章返回修改,在审稿人意见下面,是editor report,原文如下: Editors' report: An "X" has been placed before the paragraph that you need to take into consideration. 1. Review Articles should present a thorough and comprehensive overview of the chosen subject and be extensively referenced and comprise around 8000 words. Authors are expected to go beyond a simple compilation of references and analyse trends, shortcomings and accomplishments in their chosen field, charting possible future directions of the research. Illustrations and summary tables are encouraged. Flexibility of presentation is permitted, but authors are urged to arrange the subject matter clearly under the general headings of Abstract, Keywords, Introduction, Main text (The heading and the sub-headings of the main text are left to author's discretion), Summary and Conclusions, Future Perspectives, Acknowledgements, References. 2. Full papers should be complete descriptions of full investigations comprising around 5000 words with up to 6 single figures/tables/schemes in total, but your manuscript is too long or comprises too many figures/tables/schemes. You could use the supplemental information feature for extra figures/tables/. Supplementary files supplied will be published online alongside the electronic version of your article in Elsevier Science web products, but will not appear in the printed issue. You can find the details at http://ees.elsevier.com/bios/ 3. We would consider your revised manuscript for publication as a Short Communication. It should be complete descriptions of original limited investigations comprising around 3000 words with up to three single figures/tables/schemes. Alternatively, you could use the supplemental information feature for extra figures/tables/schemes. Supplementary files supplied will be published online alongside the electronic version of your article in Elsevier Science web products, but will not appear in the printed issue. You can find the details at http://ees.elsevier.com/bios/ 4. Most referees still prefer to read hard copy when they review your manuscript. In order to aid referees in printing you are strongly recommended to make your manuscript text compact and to check that it will print out in a convenient format. 5. Please rewrite the Abstract. In general, the abstract is a condensation of the information (facts) in the paper (150-250 words) and should present briefly and clearly the methods of the research and the principal results. 6. A maximum of six keywords should be given below the Abstract to describe the contents of the paper. 7. The Results and Discussion section needs to be expanded. The Results and Discussion should deals with the interpretation of the results in the light of previously published findings and must be clearly presented. 8. Please add the Conclusions section. It must be fully supported by the results reported and should include the major conclusions, the limitations of the work and the future work. 9. Please rewrite the Conclusions. 9.1 The Conclusions section is too long. It should be kept short and must be fully supported by the results reported. 9.2 The Conclusions section is not sound. It should include the major conclusions, the limitations of the work and the future work. 10. Please do not place a list of abbreviations in the text. Do not use an abbreviation without explaining it beforehand. The first time the word/phrase is introduced, put the abbreviation in brackets after the word/phrase. 11. In order to demonstrate the repeatability/reproducibility of the method authors are asked to include Error Bars in figures, and relative standard deviations (RSD) or coefficient of variation (CV) in the figures captions or in the text. 12. In order to demonstrate the repeatability/reproducibility of the method authors are asked to include relative standard deviations (RSD) or coefficient of variation (CV) in Tables. 13. We strongly suggest you to find a native English speaker to check your manuscript. 14. Please number the headings and sub-headings of the manuscript. 15. The format of the paper is incorrect. Please correct it according to the instructions of the Guide for Authors of Biosensors and Bioelectronics at http://ees.elsevier.com/bios/. 16. The format of references is incorrect. Please correct it according to the instructions of the Guide for Authors of Biosensors and Bioelectronics at http://ees.elsevier.com/bios/. Please note it is not necessary to add the title of the publications in the list of references. 17. Please delete the title of the publications in the list of references. 18. In order for the publisher to edit your paper the article must be saved in the native format of the word processor used, e.g., Word Perfect, Microsoft Word, etc. 19. The preferred positions for all figures/tables/schemes should be indicated in the text. The figure captions should be provided on a separate sheet. Present figure captions, tables, schemes and figures in this order at the end of the article. 是有"X"的才需要修改考虑吗,可是一个"X"都没有啊,有些他提到的我都是按照要求做的,但也有些比如说图片位置我没标明,迷茫了,不知道啥意思 |
» 猜你喜欢
论文终于录用啦!满足毕业条件了
已经有21人回复
不自信的我
已经有5人回复
磺酰氟产物,毕不了业了!
已经有4人回复
投稿Elsevier的杂志(返修),总是在选择OA和subscription界面被踢皮球
已经有8人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:
帮忙看一下编辑来信是什么意思?
已经有8人回复
大家帮忙看一下,这样的回复是什么意思呢?
已经有16人回复
烦劳牛人看一下这几句英语翻译哪里有问题,翻译板块人太少了,看看语法和结构也行。BB
已经有3人回复
求助啊,SCI修稿后一月有余,询问编辑,给了一封回信,大家帮忙看一下是什么意思啊
已经有24人回复
帮忙看一下,编辑是什么意思?
已经有3人回复
帮忙看一下编辑是什么意思(Materials Research Bulletin)
已经有12人回复
【求助】外导已发邀请信,正在谈学习计划。麻烦大家帮我看一下这句话是什么意思。
已经有13人回复
【求助】麻烦大家帮忙看一下德国学校的申请表上这一句话是什么意思呢?
已经有18人回复
国际期刊论文投稿求助-刚投稿就收到编辑来信,谁能帮我看一下信的内容是什么意思
已经有15人回复
【原创】一个教授回信了,请大家帮我看一下是什么意思,谢谢!
已经有61人回复
【求助】麻烦大牛帮我看一下这段话是什么意思
已经有5人回复
studyhae
木虫 (正式写手)
- SEPI: 1
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 贵宾: 0.001
- 金币: 3511.4
- 散金: 215
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 325
- 在线: 138.1小时
- 虫号: 451780
- 注册: 2007-11-05
- 专业: 河流海岸动力学与泥沙研究
2楼2010-09-21 16:57:14
3楼2012-03-15 10:31:39
allen_baobao
至尊木虫 (职业作家)
- 应助: 102 (高中生)
- 金币: 10361
- 散金: 3367
- 红花: 31
- 帖子: 3801
- 在线: 3664.3小时
- 虫号: 1175925
- 注册: 2010-12-23
- 专业: 控制理论与方法

4楼2012-03-15 14:54:47







回复此楼