| 查看: 561 | 回复: 1 | |||
zbc2008银虫 (小有名气)
|
[交流]
请高手看下审稿人的意见是什么意思.谢谢
|
|
第一次的审稿意见. Do you mean double excitations from the 1s electrons? But if the 1s population changes in the transition (Ka,Kb), the lower state possesses ~-1.0 eV more correlation energy than the upper state. If you have neglected this effect it maybe fairly easy to repair it. It would include calculating the 1s2 pair energy for the few lower states,correcting the wavelengths, and perhaps (except? in the most highly ionized cases) re-scaling the f-values (assuming the length form is proportional to dE). Or do you mean that you exclude double excitations from the valence (n=2) shell? For example,the dynamical correlation 2p2->vd2. These can be energetically important-see for example the paper by Oksuz and Sinanoglu (Phys.Rev.181,54(1969)). If you are excluding either of the two above types,you should provide additional results including these effects to see what energy errors are made by excluding them (say for O I like Krn+). For f-values,exclusion of either of these effects may not be as critical 这是二审的意见 Your text leaves me with the impression that atoms Be through Ne include just single excitation. One interpretation of that is you do a Dirac-Fock single configuration calculation (I suppose that is N=0 for you) and add single excitations to that. For example for He-like Kr, this would include 1s2 + 1s. Is that what you are doing? If so, it's unacceptable when you're breaking the K shell. There is ~1.0 eV in that shell which contributes directly to the energy differences of interest to you. For example (He-like) 1s2 -> vp2 supplies about 0.5 eV of the 1.0 eV. Is that present for you for B-like to Ne-like krypton? If we agree on what you actually did, then you need to replace "single excitation" with something more accurate (would this be an n=1 level calculation?) 希望某位高手解释下这个意见是什么意思.有没有好的方法解决.谢谢你在百忙中看这条消息 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
建议基金发布提前给出明确的时间点
已经有12人回复
-
2026国自然函评费到账
已经有3人回复
-
科研孤儿太难了
已经有17人回复
-
今日不放榜？网传国自然预计 8 月 27 日可查结果
已经有19人回复
-
看来今天不会放榜了？
已经有11人回复
-
时间戳又变了
已经有19人回复
-
filecode，4个jtjc了
已经有14人回复
-
让我中一个面上吧！
已经有13人回复
-
人气不行了
已经有7人回复
-
感觉是下周放榜了
已经有12人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 这种审稿意见是什么意思啊？怎么回复好哦
已经有41人回复
- 审稿人说有句话有语法问题，请高手帮忙看下，有BB奉送
已经有9人回复
- 请高手帮我看看审稿人的意见，其中一句话，我怎么也看不懂
已经有4人回复
- 审稿人的这句话是什么意思呢？单晶方面的，还请高手帮看看啊
已经有7人回复
- 计算机或数学专业帮忙看下这条意见是什么意思，谢谢
已经有7人回复
- 关于审稿人意见,求助高手
已经有10人回复
- 大家帮我看看这个审稿人的意见是什么意思
已经有3人回复
- 【求助】审稿人的意见是什么意思，怎么解决？
已经有18人回复
- 【求助】请教一下审稿人的意见是什么意思？
已经有5人回复
- 【求助】晶体学报E 的审稿人给了几条修改意见，不知如何解答，请高手指教！！！
已经有7人回复
- 【求助】审稿人意见，没看懂，请教高手
已经有5人回复
- 请大家帮我看下这个审稿意见是什么意思？
已经有5人回复
wandaohzl
荣誉版主 (著名写手)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 贵宾: 1.809
- 金币: 9458.3
- 散金: 5973
- 红花: 197
- 沙发: 4
- 帖子: 1839
- 在线: 416.8小时
- 虫号: 759399
- 注册: 2009-04-28
- 专业: 污染控制化学
- 管辖: 微米和纳米
2楼2010-09-16 10:52:32
