应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜    

小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 学术交流区 » 论文投稿 » 交流 » 请高手看下审稿人的意见是什么意思.谢谢
21/1返回列表
查看: 548  |  回复: 1
只看楼主 @他人 存档 新回复提醒 (忽略) 收藏    在APP中查看

zbc2008

银虫 (小有名气)

[交流] 请高手看下审稿人的意见是什么意思.谢谢

第一次的审稿意见.
Do you mean double excitations from the 1s electrons? But if the 1s population changes in the transition (Ka,Kb), the lower state possesses ~-1.0 eV more correlation energy than the upper state. If you have neglected this effect it maybe fairly easy to repair it. It would include calculating the 1s2 pair energy for the few lower states,correcting the wavelengths, and perhaps (except? in the most highly ionized cases) re-scaling the f-values (assuming the length form is proportional to dE).

Or do you mean that you exclude double excitations from the valence (n=2) shell? For example,the dynamical correlation 2p2->vd2. These can be energetically important-see for example the paper by Oksuz and Sinanoglu (Phys.Rev.181,54(1969)). If you are excluding either of the two above types,you should provide additional results including these effects to see what energy errors are made by excluding them (say for O I like Krn+).

For f-values,exclusion of either of these effects may not be as critical


这是二审的意见

Your text leaves me with the impression that atoms Be through Ne include just single excitation. One interpretation of that is you do a Dirac-Fock single configuration calculation (I suppose that is N=0 for you) and add single excitations to that. For example for He-like Kr, this would include 1s2 + 1s.


Is that what you are doing? If so, it's unacceptable when you're breaking the K shell. There is ~1.0 eV in that shell which contributes directly to the energy differences of interest to you. For example (He-like) 1s2 -> vp2 supplies about 0.5 eV of the 1.0 eV. Is that present for you for B-like to Ne-like krypton?

If we agree on what you actually did, then you need to replace "single excitation" with something more accurate (would this be an n=1 level calculation?)

希望某位高手解释下这个意见是什么意思.有没有好的方法解决.谢谢你在百忙中看这条消息
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
1楼 2010-09-15 22:10:38
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wandaohzl

荣誉版主 (著名写手)

优秀版主
zbc2008(金币+3): 2010-09-16 14:16:15
这是给你的论文里观点的质疑 和老板商议下 按审稿人意见改
赞一下 回复此楼
上下求索
2楼2010-09-16 10:52:32
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 zbc2008 的主题更新
21/1返回列表
普通表情 龙 兔 虎 猫 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
关闭
请填处理意见
关闭