24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 959  |  回复: 4
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

yuning907

金虫 (正式写手)

[交流] 帮忙分析审稿意见

刚收到一杂志审稿意见如下:

Dear Dr *,

The reviewers have commented on your above paper, indicating that the topic is appropriate for publication in ***, but the manuscript is not acceptable for publication in its present form. Although one of the reviewers has recommended rejection, I am prepared to look at a revision if you are able to address all the issues raised by both reviewers. Particularly look at the comment from reviewer #1 regarding the temperature of treatment. There are implications in this for human safety in terms of by-products and metabolites as well.
。。。。。。。

一共2个审稿人,reviewer #1 评价基本是正面的,提了一些意见,都不难修改,并推荐了几篇参考文献。reviewer #2只是说实验太简单,有些结果有过报道,并给了3点建议,没有什么具体修改意见,看来是不感兴趣。
编辑给了大修,大家帮忙分析一下是不是凶多吉少啊?

[ Last edited by yuning907 on 2010-8-24 at 19:49 ]
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

Atalpha

木虫 (著名写手)

yuning907(金币+2): 2010-08-24 21:02:27
yuning907(金币+1):文章已接受 谢谢回帖 2010-10-03 11:49:59
我觉希望很大,只要您好好解决reviewer
提出的问题,基本就接受了了!
加油!
3楼2010-08-24 20:06:08
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 yuning907 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见