| 查看: 2144 | 回复: 4 | |||
[交流]
审稿意见回复请教 已有4人参与
|
|
投了篇有关外来物种风险评价的文章到国外杂志，主编的意见是minor revision。审稿人意见是well researched and well writen, 没提到论文存在什么问题。 1 但是审稿人提了似乎不相干的问题，他认为，中国的外来入侵物种与植被破坏有关，应该考虑植被破坏对物种入侵的影响以及植被恢复计划。我觉得很难把这部分内容进行充分的展开，因为与主题相差较大，不知如何处理？如果在文中对该意见一笔带过，稍微补充一下，算是应付一下，是否可行？然后在修改说明里，表示赞成审稿人的意见？ 2 另外，审稿人在意见中提到日本有学者做过一项植被恢复与物种入侵的研究案例，但是，没提到论文名、期刊名和作者名，我实在找不到他所提到的文献，只找到类似文献，如何处理？ 谢谢指点！ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
人气不行了
已经有7人回复
-
今日不放榜？网传国自然预计 8 月 27 日可查结果
已经有18人回复
-
感觉是下周放榜了
已经有12人回复
-
看来今天不会放榜了？
已经有5人回复
-
我面上完蛋了
已经有8人回复
-
只有每年这种时候来逛逛小木虫
已经有25人回复
-
什么时候开奖？
已经有7人回复
-
时间戳又变了
已经有18人回复
-
时间戳又变了8-15
已经有27人回复
-
今天基金会出结果吗？20260819
已经有16人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 想请教一下，如果你确定审稿人给的意见是他弄错了，应该怎样答复他呢？
已经有10人回复
- 审稿意见快到期了，急，急，急，还有一个问题不知道怎么回答
已经有12人回复
- 投稿有答复了，些许激动请大家帮忙看看，谢谢大家！（在13楼增加第二封审稿意见）
已经有32人回复
- 请教这种情况下如何回复审稿人？
已经有4人回复
- 【求助】审稿意见请教！
已经有3人回复
- 请教大家一个审稿意见问题~
已经有3人回复
- 【请教】审稿人问题回复
已经有3人回复
- 请大家帮忙看看如何回复审稿意见
已经有4人回复
- Chinese Physics B 审稿意见请教
已经有10人回复
- 请教如何回答这个审稿人的意见
已经有11人回复
lwiaanngg
铁杆木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 46 (小学生)
- 贵宾: 0.773
- 金币: 7403.2
- 散金: 24
- 红花: 12
- 帖子: 1211
- 在线: 110.3小时
- 虫号: 43541
- 注册: 2004-04-10
- 专业: 应用高分子化学与物理
2楼2010-07-27 21:55:49
visitor958
至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
IEEE杂志与会议专家
- 应助: 2283 (讲师)
- 贵宾: 0.05
- 金币: 17310.5
- 散金: 2544
- 红花: 76
- 帖子: 15735
- 在线: 2926.6小时
- 虫号: 489254
- 注册: 2008-01-01
- 专业: IEEE
3楼2010-07-27 22:03:45
意见原文，请指点
|
The paper is well researched and well written, but in a country such as China, where nearly all natural vegetation has been removed or highly modified, especially in the eastern half of the country, invasive plants are really not the problem. The problem is that China is so highly disturbed and the natural environment so thoroughly destroyed, or even totally removed in some places, that almost any plants that cover up the bare soil, regardless of their origin, serve a useful purpose. If the natural environments could be restored, it is likely that introduced plants would disappear. Such an experiment was carried out at the Kochi Makino Botanical Garden in Kochi, Shikoku, Japan, where a bare piece of land was restored to what the forest was originally. For the first five or six years the staff made an effort to remove all non native plants, but after the vegetation had developed sufficiently the non native plants essentially disappeared on their own - they were unable to survive in a natural environment. In intact natural forests the introduced plants are rare, but where the land has been stripped of its natural vegetation and where the soil has been badly disturbed, then there are introduced plants, and also native invasive plants. The best way to combat introduced plants is to restore the natural environment. Perhaps the authors should address the loss of China's natural vegetation in relation 请注意，我的论文主题是对外来物种风险的评价，与外来物种的成因无关，谢谢！ |
4楼2010-07-27 22:09:27
5楼2010-07-27 22:58:28
