| 查看: 2810 | 回复: 13 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
排列组合木虫 (初入文坛)
|
[交流]
迷惑中，这是不是又被拒了呢？大家帮忙来分析一下吧！ 已有13人参与
|
||
|
前几天投了篇Materials Letters, 昨天晚上收到邮件，详情如下：Thank you for submitting your work to Materials Letters. Before we pass on manuscripts to the Journal Editor, who is responsible for the scientific assessment, we perform an initial check against formal technical criteria (structure of submission, adherence to the Guide for Authors and English language usage). We regret to inform you that your manuscript has failed the initial formal technical criteria assessment. (1) USE OF ENGLISH In its current state, the level of English throughout your manuscript does not meet the journal's required standard. Authors have the responsibility to present papers in good English which can be understood by the journal's readership. If reviewers cannot understand your work as easily as possible, the acceptance possibility of your article will be lowered greatly. We will NOT consider a revised version of your manuscript, unless it has received a complete re-writing to improve the level of English. (2) STRUCTURE AND COMPLETENESS Your manuscript is NOT in accordance with every aspect listed within the author guidelines. Your manuscript should include, but not be limited to, the comments mentioned below. 1) Materials Letters is strictly a Letters journal, so the submitted manuscript in double line spacing should not exceed 8 pages (including title, abstract, references, figures, tables and figure captions). 2) A minimum of 2 keywords should be provided from the list of keywords recommended by Materials Letters. This list is found at the end of the Guide for Authors for this Journal. (3) FINAL WORD If you thoroughly revise your manuscript in accordance with what is stated above in (1) and (2) we welcome you to resubmit it, however, we will again check your manuscript for adherence to technical criteria. Passing this is not a guarantee that your submission will subsequently proceed to the peer review process, which is a decision to be made at the sole discretion of the Editor. Yours sincerely, Amrutha Sathish Journal Manager Materials Letters 之后陷入迷茫，不知道该怎么改了，望有缘人能给予指点，不胜感激！ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
售SCI文章，我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有6人回复
-
售SCI-T0P文章，我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
为什么资助数各大高校都创新高，自己申请怎么就这么难
已经有15人回复
-
科研人应该花精力去思考如何解决问题，而不是去凝练问题
已经有14人回复
-
要骂人了，新模版改版就是要淡化问题凝练这种虚的东西，结果有个评委还在说凝练得不够
已经有17人回复
-
基金系统什么内容也没有
已经有10人回复
-
学科评审组评审是指会评吗？
已经有5人回复
-
面上合作单位盖章
已经有9人回复
-
面上函评意见出来了，像什么等级？
已经有17人回复
-
小白求助 投论文要求的highlights应该如何写
已经有4人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 我这种情况，适合申请洪堡吗？有经验的虫子来帮忙分析一下吧。
已经有25人回复
- 碳管酸化后的红外图，大家帮忙分析下吧！！
已经有10人回复
- PCR电泳图怎么会这样？各位帮忙分析一下吧
已经有12人回复
- 小弟要被延期了--求大家帮帮忙指点一下吧！
已经有4人回复
- 这个导师是什么意思呢，大家帮我分析一下吧。
已经有46人回复
- 晶体A类错误请大家帮忙解决一下吧，谢谢。。。
已经有9人回复
- 【求助/交流】部分酶切的电泳图不知为何成这个样子？有经验的虫虫们帮忙解释一下吧！
已经有10人回复
- 【求助】迷茫，大家帮忙指点一下吧
已经有22人回复
- 【求助】这是我的一个样品的DSC图，大家帮忙分析一下吧，谢谢了
已经有3人回复
- 一家公司逼着交推荐表待遇如下，大家帮忙分析下吧
已经有43人回复
- 【求助】导师回信了，大家帮忙分析下吧！谢谢！
已经有10人回复
- 【求助】综述想投个周期比较短的中文核心，大家帮忙看下吧
已经有6人回复
- 选择真是困难，大家帮忙参详一下吧
已经有19人回复
hanhue
木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1911.7
- 散金: 79
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 1739
- 在线: 467.2小时
- 虫号: 457005
- 注册: 2007-11-12
- 专业: 无机纳米化学
10楼2010-07-20 09:01:56
butterfly1234
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1612.2
- 帖子: 591
- 在线: 485.6小时
- 虫号: 465390
- 注册: 2007-11-22
- 专业: 无机非金属类光电信息与功
2楼2010-07-20 07:50:07
nandi2212
新虫 (知名作家)
- 应助: 27 (小学生)
- 金币: 16407.1
- 散金: 2535
- 红花: 35
- 帖子: 6908
- 在线: 4982.3小时
- 虫号: 90223
- 注册: 2005-08-31
- 性别: GG
3楼2010-07-20 07:54:12
4楼2010-07-20 07:54:53
30