24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 2038  |  回复: 13
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

排列组合

木虫 (初入文坛)

[交流] 迷惑中,这是不是又被拒了呢?大家帮忙来分析一下吧!已有13人参与

前几天投了篇Materials Letters, 昨天晚上收到邮件,详情如下:Thank you for submitting your work to Materials Letters.

Before we pass on manuscripts to the Journal Editor, who is responsible for the scientific assessment, we perform an initial check against formal technical criteria (structure of submission, adherence to the Guide for Authors and English language usage).

We regret to inform you that your manuscript has failed the initial formal technical criteria assessment.

(1) USE OF ENGLISH

In its current state, the level of English throughout your manuscript does not meet the journal's required standard. Authors have the responsibility to present papers in good English which can be understood by the journal's readership. If reviewers cannot understand your work as easily as possible, the acceptance possibility of your article will be lowered greatly.

We will NOT consider a revised version of your manuscript, unless it has received a complete re-writing to improve the level of English.


(2) STRUCTURE AND COMPLETENESS

Your manuscript is NOT in accordance with every aspect listed within the author guidelines. Your manuscript should include, but not be limited to, the comments mentioned below.

1) Materials Letters is strictly a Letters journal, so the submitted manuscript in double line spacing should not exceed 8 pages (including title, abstract, references, figures, tables and figure captions).

2) A minimum of 2 keywords should be provided from the list of keywords recommended by Materials Letters. This list is found at the end of the Guide for Authors for this Journal.


(3) FINAL WORD

If you thoroughly revise your manuscript in accordance with what is stated above in (1) and (2) we welcome you to resubmit it, however, we will again check your manuscript for adherence to technical criteria. Passing this is not a guarantee that your submission will subsequently proceed to the peer review process, which is a decision to be made at the sole discretion of the Editor.

Yours sincerely,

Amrutha Sathish
Journal Manager
Materials Letters

之后陷入迷茫,不知道该怎么改了,望有缘人能给予指点,不胜感激!
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

hanhue

木虫 (著名写手)

排列组合(金币+1):唉~ 谁能帮帮我呢? 2010-07-21 00:47:40
人家说的很清楚,改过之后再投呀
10楼2010-07-20 09:01:56
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 14 个回答

butterfly1234

木虫 (正式写手)

排列组合(金币+1):谢谢! 2010-07-21 00:45:15
你的稿件技术审查不合格,按照编辑的意思改好,然后再投就可以了,还没有到责任编辑那里。这种情况我遇到过,也是先经过重新进行技术修改,然后再投。现在很多杂志都会有这个步骤,不用担心的。
2楼2010-07-20 07:50:07
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

nandi2212

新虫 (知名作家)

排列组合(金币+1):唉!不知道该怎么办了~ 2010-07-21 00:45:36
技术审查没通过!
3楼2010-07-20 07:54:12
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

qinying

木虫 (著名写手)

排列组合(金币+1):我考虑一下,我都不知道属于哪种~ 2010-07-21 00:45:57
技术审核没通过, 不过按我的经验, 一般这样事多的杂志有两种可能, 一种是很牛的杂志, 影响因子高, 要求高; 另一种, 呵呵, 就不说什么了.
楼主文章质量如何最好找个懂行的人看看, 如果真的如人家所说只是格式语言不对, 好好改再投, 如果不是趁早改投其他杂志吧, 免得浪费时间
云在天边,水在瓶。
4楼2010-07-20 07:54:53
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通表情 高级回复(可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见