| 查看: 3534 | 回复: 35 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
ipp金虫 (正式写手)
|
[交流]
收到审稿意见了，大家帮我看看！ 已有34人参与
|
||
|
Dear Dr ***, Thank you for submitting your manuscript to the JIP. Two experts in the field have reviewed your manuscript, and while they find the topic of interest and potential importance, they have noticed substantial flaws that must be corrected before your study can be published in our Journal. I have examined their comments and recommendations for changes to your study and manuscript and I am in full agreement with these. Thus, if you wish to have your manuscript published in the JIP, you will have to address all of their comments on a point-by-point basis and submit a revised manuscript. Your revised manuscript will then be sent to the same two experts for further review to determine its suitability for publication. An important point made by both reviewers is that some of your conclusions can not be drawn without providing additional data to support these points in your manuscript. The reviewers' comments are below. Please submit your revision online within 90 days by logging onto the Elsevier Editorial System for the JIP You may find the manuscript record listed under "Submissions Needing Revisions." Click "Revise" when you are ready to submit your revision. (If you have forgotten your password, please click the "Forget your password" link located on the log-in screen). When submitting your revised paper, please include a separate document uploaded as "Response to Reviews" that carefully addresses the issues raised in the below comments, point by point. You should also include a suitable rebuttal to any specific request for change that has not been made. To facilitate the electronic publication of your manuscript (should it be accepted), we request that your manuscript text, tables and figure legend be submitted in an editable format (Word, WordPerfect, or LaTex only), and all figures uploaded individually as TIF or EPS files. Thank you, and we look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. With kind regards, **** PhD Editor-in-Chief JIP |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
2026年的国家社科基金项目通讯评审的新规则与新动向、新挑战
已经有7人回复
-
今天基金会出结果吗？20260819
已经有18人回复
-
我面上完蛋了
已经有14人回复
-
范进中举一文的中心思想
已经有8人回复
-
只有每年这种时候来逛逛小木虫
已经有27人回复
-
明天应该可查了！？
已经有5人回复
-
如果此刻你正在为国基感到焦虑，不妨来听听这首《基金之外》
已经有7人回复
-
没有任何消息-是不是就凉了
已经有8人回复
-
人气不行了
已经有10人回复
-
能否退出参与的面上项目解除限项
已经有24人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 大家帮我看看仲裁人意见该如何处理？
已经有7人回复
- 投稿有答复了，些许激动请大家帮忙看看，谢谢大家！（在13楼增加第二封审稿意见）
已经有32人回复
- 大家帮我看看这个审稿意见
已经有23人回复
- 大家帮我看看这个拒稿信的意思？
已经有8人回复
- 这稿子我审还是不审？大家帮我看看！
已经有17人回复
- 【求助】请大家帮我看看Applied Catalysis B 的审稿意见吧，谢谢啦
已经有14人回复
- 审稿意见回来了，大家帮忙看一下。。
已经有9人回复
- 文章的审稿意见，大家帮忙看看！
已经有6人回复
- 【讨论】大家帮我看看审稿意见呗！！！
已经有7人回复
- 审稿意见回来了，大家帮我看看还有希望吗
已经有3人回复
- 审稿意见，大家帮忙看看
已经有8人回复
- 请大家帮忙看看如何回复审稿意见
已经有4人回复
- 审稿意见回来，一个审稿人让据，编辑说大修，大家帮我看看希望大不
已经有24人回复
felicity6056
至尊木虫 (知名作家)
- 应助: 6 (幼儿园)
- 贵宾: 0.033
- 金币: 10209.1
- 散金: 389
- 红花: 6
- 帖子: 6701
- 在线: 1054.7小时
- 虫号: 762546
- 注册: 2009-05-04
- 专业: 化石能源储存与输送
5楼2010-06-28 11:07:35
2楼2010-06-28 10:44:22
zhiyongwang
至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
- 应助: 269 (大学生)
- 金币: 48212.2
- 散金: 4812
- 红花: 26
- 沙发: 3
- 帖子: 25665
- 在线: 1151.4小时
- 虫号: 897198
- 注册: 2009-11-08
- 专业: 分离化学
3楼2010-06-28 11:00:32
sculhf
荣誉版主 (知名作家)
断翼天使
-
专家经验: +1 - 应助: 243 (大学生)
- 贵宾: 4.018
- 金币: 43355.9
- 散金: 1634
- 红花: 64
- 沙发: 16
- 帖子: 7688
- 在线: 2008.4小时
- 虫号: 497659
- 注册: 2008-02-02
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 凝聚态物性 II ：电子结构
- 管辖: 基金申请
6楼2010-06-28 11:08:45
20