| 查看: 3445 | 回复: 35 | |||
ipp金虫 (正式写手)
|
[交流]
收到审稿意见了，大家帮我看看！ 已有34人参与
|
|
Dear Dr ***, Thank you for submitting your manuscript to the JIP. Two experts in the field have reviewed your manuscript, and while they find the topic of interest and potential importance, they have noticed substantial flaws that must be corrected before your study can be published in our Journal. I have examined their comments and recommendations for changes to your study and manuscript and I am in full agreement with these. Thus, if you wish to have your manuscript published in the JIP, you will have to address all of their comments on a point-by-point basis and submit a revised manuscript. Your revised manuscript will then be sent to the same two experts for further review to determine its suitability for publication. An important point made by both reviewers is that some of your conclusions can not be drawn without providing additional data to support these points in your manuscript. The reviewers' comments are below. Please submit your revision online within 90 days by logging onto the Elsevier Editorial System for the JIP You may find the manuscript record listed under "Submissions Needing Revisions." Click "Revise" when you are ready to submit your revision. (If you have forgotten your password, please click the "Forget your password" link located on the log-in screen). When submitting your revised paper, please include a separate document uploaded as "Response to Reviews" that carefully addresses the issues raised in the below comments, point by point. You should also include a suitable rebuttal to any specific request for change that has not been made. To facilitate the electronic publication of your manuscript (should it be accepted), we request that your manuscript text, tables and figure legend be submitted in an editable format (Word, WordPerfect, or LaTex only), and all figures uploaded individually as TIF or EPS files. Thank you, and we look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. With kind regards, **** PhD Editor-in-Chief JIP |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
2026年国自然面上资助率
已经有21人回复
-
基础研究怎么拉横向，学校到款任务越来越多，难以完成 拉横向，都有哪些途径啊
已经有10人回复
-
2027年申博
已经有3人回复
-
一个有机合成实验室都需要哪些设备？
已经有7人回复
-
面上再次挂了，太难了，躺也躺不了，倦也卷不过，小学校之殇！
已经有22人回复
-
微信指数没变化，科研之友没阅读
已经有18人回复
-
HXDI做水性聚氨酯乳液，是不是特别容易出渣
已经有3人回复
-
系统今天又提示维护了，估计离放榜不远了
已经有15人回复
-
你们的时间戳变了吗
已经有4人回复
-
产物和副产物价值比较
已经有5人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 大家帮我看看仲裁人意见该如何处理？
已经有7人回复
- 投稿有答复了，些许激动请大家帮忙看看，谢谢大家！（在13楼增加第二封审稿意见）
已经有32人回复
- 大家帮我看看这个审稿意见
已经有23人回复
- 大家帮我看看这个拒稿信的意思？
已经有8人回复
- 这稿子我审还是不审？大家帮我看看！
已经有17人回复
- 【求助】请大家帮我看看Applied Catalysis B 的审稿意见吧，谢谢啦
已经有14人回复
- 审稿意见回来了，大家帮忙看一下。。
已经有9人回复
- 文章的审稿意见，大家帮忙看看！
已经有6人回复
- 【讨论】大家帮我看看审稿意见呗！！！
已经有7人回复
- 审稿意见回来了，大家帮我看看还有希望吗
已经有3人回复
- 审稿意见，大家帮忙看看
已经有8人回复
- 请大家帮忙看看如何回复审稿意见
已经有4人回复
- 审稿意见回来，一个审稿人让据，编辑说大修，大家帮我看看希望大不
已经有24人回复
2楼2010-06-28 10:44:22
zhiyongwang
至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
- 应助: 269 (大学生)
- 金币: 48211.4
- 散金: 4812
- 红花: 26
- 沙发: 3
- 帖子: 25664
- 在线: 1151.4小时
- 虫号: 897198
- 注册: 2009-11-08
- 专业: 分离化学
3楼2010-06-28 11:00:32
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流
恭喜恭喜 |
4楼2010-06-28 11:02:57
felicity6056
至尊木虫 (知名作家)
- 应助: 6 (幼儿园)
- 贵宾: 0.033
- 金币: 10209.1
- 散金: 389
- 红花: 6
- 帖子: 6701
- 在线: 1054.7小时
- 虫号: 762546
- 注册: 2009-05-04
- 专业: 化石能源储存与输送
5楼2010-06-28 11:07:35
sculhf
荣誉版主 (知名作家)
断翼天使
-
专家经验: +1 - 应助: 243 (大学生)
- 贵宾: 4.018
- 金币: 43345.9
- 散金: 1634
- 红花: 64
- 沙发: 16
- 帖子: 7686
- 在线: 2008.3小时
- 虫号: 497659
- 注册: 2008-02-02
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 凝聚态物性 II ：电子结构
- 管辖: 基金申请
6楼2010-06-28 11:08:45
yuhuaqing
至尊木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 8 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 12197.9
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 1862
- 在线: 941.5小时
- 虫号: 266489
- 注册: 2006-07-16
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 光学
7楼2010-06-28 11:22:38
亚楠
至尊木虫 (知名作家)
追逐幸福的人
- 应助: 396 (硕士)
- 金币: 23821.4
- 散金: 60
- 红花: 29
- 帖子: 7645
- 在线: 934小时
- 虫号: 593663
- 注册: 2008-09-05
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 凝聚态物性 II ：电子结构
8楼2010-06-28 11:41:22
9楼2010-06-28 11:43:45
chexingg-613
铜虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1157.7
- 帖子: 316
- 在线: 17.6小时
- 虫号: 367934
- 注册: 2007-05-11
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 生物传感器
10楼2010-06-28 11:44:20