| 查看: 2234 | 回复: 4 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
冯书航190511新虫 (初入文坛)
|
[交流]
大家帮我看看审稿人的意见，需要大修，不知道希望大不 已有4人参与
|
||
|
Dear Dr. Feng, Thank you for submitting your paper to Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing I have considered the comments of the reviewers sen to me directly. A. Concerning the classification, these were ========================================== 1) From the visual inspection of Fig.5 it follows that the first two principal components are not the best features for classification, because it is possible to obtain a reliable classifier making use of a single component only. 2) Structure of discussed neural network is not appropriate. The size (cardinality) of the training data set should be significantly greater than the number of unknown parameters (coefficients) in neural network. Unfortunately in discussed example the training set consist of 200 examples only and the number of unknown neural network coefficients is equal to (13+1)*15+(15+1)*1 = 226. 3) It is recommended to use ISO units for physical quantities. The force units [gf] should be replaced with [N] or [mN]. ============================================================ B. Concerning the basic method these were ========================================= Why are the specific features chosen? Have they any physical interpretation, relating them to the bonding quality?If not than this is somewhat a case history, and probably many other features (maybe based directly on the signal) could be invented Also the design of filters, Hilbert method etc are well known many of the details are not needed, the method alone is required. ================================================ When revising your manuscript please consult both the journal's Guide for Authors, and the information on electronic artwork preparation at the following website: http://www.ees.elsevier.com/ymssp. The revision notes sent with your revised paper should give a full account of the changes made. If the response to the reviewers' comments is not complete and descriptive, I will be unable to make a prompt decision on the paper. To submit a revision, go to http://ees.elsevier.com/ymssp/ and log in as an Author. You will see a menu item called "Submission Needing Revision". You will find your submission record there. For guidelines on how to submit your revised manuscript please go the following address: http://epsupport.elsevier.com/article.aspx?article=1405&p=3 Your username is: ****** If you need to retrieve password details, please go to: http://ees.elsevier.com/ymssp/automail_query.asp. When submitting your revised manuscript, please ensure that you upload the source files (e.g. Word). Uploading only a PDF file at this stage will create delays should your manuscript be finally accepted for publication. If your revised submission does not include the source files, we will contact you to request them. Yours sincerely, Simon Braun Editor in Chief Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing Email: mssp@elsevier.com MSSP Online: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ymssp Elsevier Editorial System: http://ees.elsevier.com/ymssp http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/08883270 For further assistance, please visit our customer support site at http://epsupport.elsevier.com. Here you can search for solutions on a range of topics, find answers to frequently asked questions and learn more about EES via interactive tutorials. You will also find our 24/7 support contact details should you need any further assistance from one of our customer support representatives. [ Last edited by 冯书航190511 on 2010-6-10 at 19:56 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
285求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
材料求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
288求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
复试调剂
已经有12人回复
-
计算机11408，286分求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
材料专硕322分
已经有8人回复
-
一志愿上海海洋大学083200食品学硕，求调剂，接受其他专业083200
已经有5人回复
-
081200-11408-276学硕求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
材料调剂
已经有10人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 求大家帮我看看审稿人的这个意见（Uiso/Uij？）谢谢大家！！！急
已经有10人回复
- 麻烦大家帮我看看审稿人什么意思（配合物或金属有机）
已经有4人回复
- 第一篇投稿被拒，帮我看看审稿人的意见，是否可以采纳，修改重投
已经有15人回复
- 大家帮我看看审稿人的真正意思
已经有10人回复
- 请大家帮忙看看这个审稿意见（不太明白审稿人有没有提出修改意见）
已经有7人回复
- 大家帮我看看审稿人的意见是大修还是小修，接收概率多大
已经有9人回复
- 大家帮忙看看小修完成后还需要返给审稿人吗？
已经有18人回复
- 有一条审稿人意见看不大懂，请大家帮忙分析下！急！
已经有6人回复
- 【求助】求大家帮我看看审稿人让我算的的是什么性质.
已经有6人回复
- 帮我看看这个审稿人的意见
已经有6人回复
- 大家帮我看看审稿人这个问题怎么回答？
已经有8人回复
- 【求助】帮我看看审稿人的意见是否又接受的希望
已经有22人回复
- 审稿意见回来，一个审稿人让据，编辑说大修，大家帮我看看希望大不
已经有24人回复
4楼2010-06-10 22:27:04
ljhcumt
铁杆木虫 (著名写手)
木虫精英
- 应助: 82 (初中生)
- 金币: 8819.5
- 散金: 103
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 2761
- 在线: 247.2小时
- 虫号: 793751
- 注册: 2009-06-13
- 专业: 泛函分析
2楼2010-06-10 19:59:01
3楼2010-06-10 22:23:52
5楼2014-01-10 14:32:48
