24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

冯书航190511

新虫 (初入文坛)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 11.6
帖子: 23
在线: 21.3小时
虫号: 938974
注册: 2010-01-08
性别: GG
专业: 机械测试理论与技术

[交流] 大家帮我看看审稿人的意见，需要大修，不知道希望大不已有4人参与

Dear Dr. Feng,

Thank you for submitting your paper to Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing

I have considered the comments of the reviewers sen to me directly.

A.  Concerning the classification, these were
==========================================
1) From the visual inspection of Fig.5 it follows that the first two
principal components are not the best features for classification,
because it is possible to obtain a reliable classifier making use of a
single component only.

2) Structure of discussed neural network is not appropriate. The size
(cardinality) of the training data set should be significantly greater
than the number of unknown parameters (coefficients) in neural network.
Unfortunately in discussed example the training set consist of 200
examples only and the number of unknown neural network coefficients is
equal to (13+1)*15+(15+1)*1 = 226.

3) It is recommended to use ISO units for physical quantities. The force
units [gf] should be replaced with [N] or [mN].

============================================================

B.  Concerning the basic method these were
=========================================

Why are the specific features chosen? Have they any physical interpretation, relating them to the bonding quality?If not than this is somewhat a case history, and probably many other features (maybe based directly on the signal) could be invented
Also the design of filters, Hilbert method etc are well known many of the details are not needed, the method alone is required.
================================================
When revising your manuscript please consult both the journal's Guide for Authors, and the information on electronic artwork preparation at the following website: http://www.ees.elsevier.com/ymssp.

The revision notes sent with your revised paper should give a full account of the changes made. If the response to the reviewers' comments is not complete and descriptive, I will be unable to make a prompt decision on the paper.

To submit a revision, go to http://ees.elsevier.com/ymssp/ and log in as an Author.  You will see a menu item called "Submission Needing Revision".  You will find your submission record there.

For guidelines on how to submit your revised manuscript please go the following address: http://epsupport.elsevier.com/article.aspx?article=1405&p=3

Your username is: ******
If you need to retrieve password details, please go to: http://ees.elsevier.com/ymssp/automail_query.asp.

When submitting your revised manuscript, please ensure that you upload the source files (e.g. Word). Uploading only a PDF file at this stage will create delays should your manuscript be finally accepted for publication.  If your revised submission does not include the source files, we will contact you to request them.

Yours sincerely,

Simon Braun
Editor in Chief

Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing
Email: mssp@elsevier.com
MSSP Online: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ymssp
Elsevier Editorial System: http://ees.elsevier.com/ymssp
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/08883270

For further assistance, please visit our customer support site at http://epsupport.elsevier.com. Here you can search for solutions on a range of topics, find answers to frequently asked questions and learn more about EES via interactive tutorials. You will also find our 24/7 support contact details should you need any further assistance from one of our customer support representatives.

[ Last edited by 冯书航190511 on 2010-6-10 at 19:56 ]

回复此楼