| ²é¿´: 2415 | »Ø¸´: 27 | |||
qinhuafengÒø³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
|
[½»Á÷]
Éó¸åÒâ¼û·ÖÎö ÒÑÓÐ26È˲ÎÓë
|
|
We have had your manuscript ***** reviewed and I have some referee comments. We regret that your paper, in its present form, is not acceptable for publication in Pattern Recognition. However, if you care to revise it, we will reconsider it for publication. Your revised manuscript is due by Aug 05, 2010 Kindly advise of your plans to resubmit your paper °ïÎÒ·ÖÎöһϣ¬ÓÐÏ£Íû²»£¿×îºóÒ»¾ä»°ÊÇʲôÒâ˼ лл¸÷λ³æ×Ó |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸Î÷°²½»Í¨´óѧ²ÄÁϹ¤³Ìרҵ 282·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
269ר˶Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
×ÊÔ´Óë»·¾³ µ÷¼ÁÉêÇë(333·Ö)
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
354Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
»¯Ñ§¹¤³Ì321·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ22È˻ظ´
¿¼Ñе÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
326Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
333Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸¶«»ª´óѧ¿ØÖÆÑ§Ë¶320Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹Ø¼ÛÖµÌùÍÆ¼ö£¬¶ÔÄúͬÑùÓаïÖú:
Çó¸ßÈ˰ïæ·ÖÎöÏÂAPLÉó¸åÒâ¼û
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
SCIÉó¸åÒâ¼û»ØÀ´ÁË£¬±à¼¸øµÄmoderate revision£¬Âé·³´ó¼Ò°ï·ÖÎöһϣ¬ÓÐBB
ÒѾÓÐ28È˻ظ´
Éó¸åÒâ¼û»ØÀ´ÁË£¬´ó¼Ò°ïæ·ÖÎöһϣ¬ÓÐЩÒâ¼û¿´²»¶®£¿
ÒѾÓÐ14È˻ظ´
¡¶¹ý³Ì¹¤³Ìѧ±¨¡·Éó¸åÒâ¼û²»»á»Ø´ð£¬Ôõô°ì£¿
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
Çë´ó¼Ò°ïæ·ÖÎöÏÂÕâ¾äÉó¸åÒâ¼ûÊÇʲôÒâ˼
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
ר¼ÒÉó¸åÒâ¼û£¬Çë´ó¼Ò°ïæ·ÖÎö£¡
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
´ó¼Ò°ïÎÒ·ÖÎöÒ»ÏÂmaterial and designµÄÉó¸åÒâ¼û£¬Â¼Óü¸Âʴ󲻣¿
ÒѾÓÐ24È˻ظ´
¡¾ÌÖÂÛ¡¿´ó¼Ò°ïÎÒ¿´¿´Éó¸åÒâ¼ûߣ¡£¡£¡
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
˼û¹ýÕâÑùµÄÉó¸åÒâ¼û£¿
ÒѾÓÐ34È˻ظ´
°ïæ·ÖÎöÉó¸åÒâ¼û
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
Çë´ó¼Ò°ï·ÖÎöÏÂÉó¸åÈËÕâÒâ¼ûÈçºÎ»Ø¸´°¡£¿
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
jimome
ľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 4890.7
- É¢½ð: 229
- ºì»¨: 5
- Ìû×Ó: 680
- ÔÚÏß: 506.5Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 617575
- ×¢²á: 2008-10-05
- רҵ: ÐźÅÀíÂÛÓëÐźŴ¦Àí
¡ï
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
| Ï£ÍûÄãÈÏÕæÐ޸ģ¬ÈôÄã½ÓÊÜÐ޸ģ¬ÇëÔÚ8ÔÂ5ºÅ֮ǰ·µ»ØÐ޸ĸå |
2Â¥2010-05-08 15:31:26
yfju
½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 235.6
- É¢½ð: 96
- Ìû×Ó: 501
- ÔÚÏß: 98.9Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 608846
- ×¢²á: 2008-09-21
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: °ëµ¼Ìå¾§ÌåÓ뱡Ĥ²ÄÁÏ
3Â¥2010-05-08 15:33:42
qinhuafeng
Òø³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 2 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 351.9
- É¢½ð: 792
- ºì»¨: 4
- Ìû×Ó: 826
- ÔÚÏß: 457.5Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 901447
- ×¢²á: 2009-11-12
- רҵ: ģʽʶ±ð
|
Reviewer #2: 1. The authors should give the influence of their claims to the original work in [1]; 2.The Enlish writing of this comment is really poor, the authors should ask for some help from their colleagues who are more familiar with English; Reviewer #1£º 1They will find that the results are in accordance with the correct version of the equations quoted by them. This fact should be mentioned in their comment paper.£¨Ç°Ã沿·Ö˵µÄÒ»¸öʵÑ飩 2. ¸Äһϱí¸ñÊý¾Ý£¨ÅŰæµÄʱºòд·´ÁË£© ÎÊһϣ¬Èç¹ûÐ޸ĵϰ¸ù±¾²»ÐèÒªÕâô³¤Ê±¼ä£¬ÎÒÄܲ»ÄÜÔÚ°ë¸öÔ¾ÍÌá½»ÁË£¿ |
4Â¥2010-05-08 15:49:41
jlcÒ¹Óê
Òø³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 576.5
- É¢½ð: 1069
- ºì»¨: 1
- Ìû×Ó: 2200
- ÔÚÏß: 185.3Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 406253
- ×¢²á: 2007-06-18
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ¿óÒ±Éú̬Óë»·¾³¹¤³Ì
5Â¥2010-05-08 15:50:23
gongxinghang
½ð³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 1159.3
- É¢½ð: 11
- ºì»¨: 7
- Ìû×Ó: 1842
- ÔÚÏß: 197.3Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 438290
- ×¢²á: 2007-09-19
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ¹âÆ×·ÖÎö

6Â¥2010-05-08 16:02:44
wsaluo
ľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 1 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 2191.8
- É¢½ð: 215
- ºì»¨: 1
- Ìû×Ó: 1639
- ÔÚÏß: 206.3Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 979711
- ×¢²á: 2010-03-23
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ΢Á¿ÔªËصØÇò»¯Ñ§
7Â¥2010-05-08 16:07:09
zjxugd
Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 8878.7
- Ìû×Ó: 1178
- ÔÚÏß: 149.2Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 581251
- ×¢²á: 2008-07-18
8Â¥2010-05-08 16:14:04
ÓêÃÎ8278
ľ³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 3314.3
- Ìû×Ó: 260
- ÔÚÏß: 70.4Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 742875
- ×¢²á: 2009-04-08
- ÐÔ±ð: MM
- רҵ: ÖÐÒ©ÖÊÁ¿ÆÀ¼Û
9Â¥2010-05-08 16:43:59
xujungu
ͳæ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 171.2
- ºì»¨: 7
- Ìû×Ó: 159
- ÔÚÏß: 311.5Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 809267
- ×¢²á: 2009-07-15
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ÎÞ»ú·Ç½ðÊôÀà¹âµçÐÅÏ¢Ó빦

10Â¥2010-05-08 16:58:51













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥