24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 938  |  回复: 15
当前主题已经存档。

xqbeyond

木虫 (著名写手)

斗士

[交流] 谋求正解编辑意思!虽知已拒!

Dear Dr. qiang,

Thank you for submitting your above-mentioned paper to Acta Materialia. As the Coordinating Editor of Acta Materialia, I receive all submitted papers. It is my responsibility to examine all papers before sending them to different editors for processing. Since in recent times, the number of submissions has increased substantially, I use my judgment in dividing the submitted papers into two categories: to be processed and not to be processed. This is to maintain a reasonable workload for the editors and the reviewers. I am afraid your paper fell into the latter category.

My decision for a paper for "not to be processed" is based on several criteria: the quality of writing; the review of relevant literature in the Introduction Section: the length of the article (we do not publish short articles in Acta because we have Scripta Materialia for that purpose); the match with aims and scope of Acta; and the advancement of existing knowledge base.

I have decided not to further process your manuscript because:

- the relevant published literature is not critically reviewed.
- the English grammar and syntax are not satisfactory. Overall, the writing is not optimal and not up to the standards of Acta Materialia.
- it is short for an Acta submission and does not contain sufficient new results, techniques or theories relevant to the field your manuscript addresses to warrant publication as a full paper in Acta Materialia.
- it does not have a good fit with the aims and scope of Acta Materialia.

Thank you for your interest in publishing in Acta Materialia.

Yours sincerely,

Subhash Mahajan
Assigning Editor
Acta Materialia
回复此楼
再牛逼似的梦想也挡不住傻逼似的坚持
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

green1223

木虫 (职业作家)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
虽然我不知道什么意思 ,  但是楼主的想法我很支持   祝你好运!
2楼2009-07-12 16:28:02
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhangweibao

木虫 (职业作家)

我心依旧

祝福你啊
命里有时终须有,命里无时莫强求
3楼2009-07-12 16:33:43
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

prrsw

金虫 (正式写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
格式不符合要,内容不够创新,长度不够,等理由,不进入审稿环节,楼主继续努力
4楼2009-07-12 16:36:21
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

vazz77


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
- the relevant published literature is not critically reviewed.
这一句什么意思?
5楼2009-07-12 16:44:12
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

sars518

木虫 (著名写手)

小木虫灌水大队队长


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
引用回帖:
Originally posted by vazz77 at 2009-7-12 16:44:
- the relevant published literature is not critically reviewed.
这一句什么意思?

说你没有认真研读 已经发表的相关文献   

楼主改投吧,祝你好运
人生是一场旅行,在欣赏风景的同时,别忘了你也是别人的风景。
6楼2009-07-12 17:03:39
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

yanchunze

铁虫 (初入文坛)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
相关文献没有准确论述
英文语法不令人满意,达不到杂志要求
文章太短,没有足够创新结果
文章内容不太适合该杂志
7楼2009-07-12 17:06:04
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

polyw

金虫 (小有名气)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
引用回帖:
Originally posted by yanchunze at 2009-7-12 17:06:
相关文献没有准确论述
英文语法不令人满意,达不到杂志要求
文章太短,没有足够创新结果
文章内容不太适合该杂志

第一条和第三四条相当关键,lz要再找找最新的文献啊,另外杂志一般出版什么样的文章你总该知道吧,它都不出版短文章的,你写这么短干什么。新意要求也很重要,创新点少就系统地做才行啊
8楼2009-07-12 17:12:18
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

likeupp

新虫 (正式写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
这个杂志要求很高,你的初审没通过
9楼2009-07-12 17:31:01
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

xqbeyond

木虫 (著名写手)

斗士

是啊,的确啊,哎,第一次投英文稿件,所以已有准备被拒,谢谢各位。。。。。。
再牛逼似的梦想也挡不住傻逼似的坚持
10楼2009-07-12 19:15:38
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 xqbeyond 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见