| 查看: 1190 | 回复: 15 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
xqbeyond木虫 (著名写手)
斗士
|
[交流]
谋求正解编辑意思！虽知已拒！
|
||
|
Dear Dr. qiang, Thank you for submitting your above-mentioned paper to Acta Materialia. As the Coordinating Editor of Acta Materialia, I receive all submitted papers. It is my responsibility to examine all papers before sending them to different editors for processing. Since in recent times, the number of submissions has increased substantially, I use my judgment in dividing the submitted papers into two categories: to be processed and not to be processed. This is to maintain a reasonable workload for the editors and the reviewers. I am afraid your paper fell into the latter category. My decision for a paper for "not to be processed" is based on several criteria: the quality of writing; the review of relevant literature in the Introduction Section: the length of the article (we do not publish short articles in Acta because we have Scripta Materialia for that purpose); the match with aims and scope of Acta; and the advancement of existing knowledge base. I have decided not to further process your manuscript because: - the relevant published literature is not critically reviewed. - the English grammar and syntax are not satisfactory. Overall, the writing is not optimal and not up to the standards of Acta Materialia. - it is short for an Acta submission and does not contain sufficient new results, techniques or theories relevant to the field your manuscript addresses to warrant publication as a full paper in Acta Materialia. - it does not have a good fit with the aims and scope of Acta Materialia. Thank you for your interest in publishing in Acta Materialia. Yours sincerely, Subhash Mahajan Assigning Editor Acta Materialia |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
有时候，自然基金真的不能太认真 （我的申报经验）
已经有10人回复
-
filecode
已经有12人回复
-
filecode=后面第一个是大写字母
已经有4人回复
-
时间戳又变了8-15
已经有20人回复
-
小木虫上这么多卖论文的，真有人买论文么？感觉没必要啊
已经有13人回复
-
欢迎发来filecode的Mz6后的代码验证其规律
已经有58人回复
-
哪位老哥知道今年的国自然具体哪一天放榜？
已经有7人回复
-
关于Filecode分析方法
已经有13人回复
-
各位道友，我要去昆明玩几天，回来见。
已经有8人回复
-
咱们一起用铁证分析2026国家社科基金中标与否
已经有22人回复
7楼2009-07-12 17:06:04
2楼2009-07-12 16:28:02
4楼2009-07-12 16:36:21
5楼2009-07-12 16:44:12
