24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1189  |  回复: 15
当前主题已经存档。
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

xqbeyond

木虫 (著名写手)

斗士

[交流] 谋求正解编辑意思!虽知已拒!

Dear Dr. qiang,

Thank you for submitting your above-mentioned paper to Acta Materialia. As the Coordinating Editor of Acta Materialia, I receive all submitted papers. It is my responsibility to examine all papers before sending them to different editors for processing. Since in recent times, the number of submissions has increased substantially, I use my judgment in dividing the submitted papers into two categories: to be processed and not to be processed. This is to maintain a reasonable workload for the editors and the reviewers. I am afraid your paper fell into the latter category.

My decision for a paper for "not to be processed" is based on several criteria: the quality of writing; the review of relevant literature in the Introduction Section: the length of the article (we do not publish short articles in Acta because we have Scripta Materialia for that purpose); the match with aims and scope of Acta; and the advancement of existing knowledge base.

I have decided not to further process your manuscript because:

- the relevant published literature is not critically reviewed.
- the English grammar and syntax are not satisfactory. Overall, the writing is not optimal and not up to the standards of Acta Materialia.
- it is short for an Acta submission and does not contain sufficient new results, techniques or theories relevant to the field your manuscript addresses to warrant publication as a full paper in Acta Materialia.
- it does not have a good fit with the aims and scope of Acta Materialia.

Thank you for your interest in publishing in Acta Materialia.

Yours sincerely,

Subhash Mahajan
Assigning Editor
Acta Materialia
回复此楼
再牛逼似的梦想也挡不住傻逼似的坚持
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

polyw

金虫 (小有名气)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
引用回帖:
Originally posted by yanchunze at 2009-7-12 17:06:
相关文献没有准确论述
英文语法不令人满意,达不到杂志要求
文章太短,没有足够创新结果
文章内容不太适合该杂志

第一条和第三四条相当关键,lz要再找找最新的文献啊,另外杂志一般出版什么样的文章你总该知道吧,它都不出版短文章的,你写这么短干什么。新意要求也很重要,创新点少就系统地做才行啊
8楼2009-07-12 17:12:18
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 16 个回答

green1223

木虫 (职业作家)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
虽然我不知道什么意思 ,  但是楼主的想法我很支持   祝你好运!
2楼2009-07-12 16:28:02
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

prrsw

金虫 (正式写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
格式不符合要,内容不够创新,长度不够,等理由,不进入审稿环节,楼主继续努力
4楼2009-07-12 16:36:21
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

vazz77


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
- the relevant published literature is not critically reviewed.
这一句什么意思?
5楼2009-07-12 16:44:12
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 时间戳又变了8-15 +11 archvillain 2026-08-15 20/1000 2026-08-15 17:47 by 医学老男孩
[考博] 售一区SCI文章T0P,我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急 +4 HFw0lei2R37i 2026-08-14 6/300 2026-08-15 17:34 by 7huP8NPKZCp9
[基金申请] 小木虫上这么多卖论文的,真有人买论文么?感觉没必要啊 +12 Tide man 2026-08-10 13/650 2026-08-15 16:34 by 氺木
[基金申请] 哪位老哥知道今年的国自然具体哪一天放榜? +7 Ldrop2023 2026-08-13 7/350 2026-08-15 15:57 by mzhh2000
[硕博家园] 售SCI一区文章,我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急 +4 k0dTPqJtl0jt 2026-08-14 5/250 2026-08-15 14:58 by QXtWNz7PI7wZ
[硕博家园] 售SCI一区文章,我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急 +3 7lpolszZVXgi 2026-08-14 3/150 2026-08-15 14:53 by QXtWNz7PI7wZ
[基金申请] 有时候,自然基金真的不能太认真 (我的申报经验) +7 majunge000 2026-08-11 9/450 2026-08-15 13:34 by kiz2011
[博后之家] 售SCI文章,我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急 +3 k0dTPqJtl0jt 2026-08-14 3/150 2026-08-15 12:41 by KxMI1BYBxWX1
[基金申请] 关于Filecode分析方法 +10 majunge000 2026-08-10 13/650 2026-08-15 12:26 by hanpeng972
[考研] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急 +5 HFw0lei2R37i 2026-08-14 9/450 2026-08-15 11:33 by KxMI1BYBxWX1
[论文投稿] 售SCI一区文章,我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急 +3 HFw0lei2R37i 2026-08-14 5/250 2026-08-15 00:16 by 4wMiSEwB6436
[基金申请] 奇怪,两个人的filecode固定段从头到尾一模一样 +8 布布和一二 2026-08-10 11/550 2026-08-14 14:58 by Equinoxhua
[文学芳草园] 阿姨 +4 汪汪锅 2026-08-09 4/200 2026-08-13 19:43 by arzu_hma
[基金申请] 静等基金结果 +8 gjjjzhong 2026-08-10 21/1050 2026-08-13 17:56 by 且听虎啸
[基金申请] 分享一下我之前已中青C的计划书的filecode +4 布布和一二 2026-08-11 5/250 2026-08-13 12:56 by cratir
[基金申请] 2019年青年基金涵评意见,大家看看几个A,几个B? +11 Tide man 2026-08-11 11/550 2026-08-13 07:35 by 撸猫猫
[基金申请] 综述论文作为代表作会不会影响评审专家的印象分? +11 yufeiwaner 2026-08-09 13/650 2026-08-12 08:17 by yufeiwaner
[基金申请] 帮忙看看fileCode +7 wwncly 2026-08-10 13/650 2026-08-11 19:36 by 冰心玉壶晴
[基金申请] 确定了,国自然21号放榜 +6 布布和一二 2026-08-10 7/350 2026-08-10 19:15 by 2000zf36392
[基金申请] 国自然结果 +4 Vierhys 2026-08-10 8/400 2026-08-10 15:06 by Vierhys
信息提示
请填处理意见