24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1178  |  回复: 15
当前主题已经存档。
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

xqbeyond

木虫 (著名写手)

斗士

[交流] 谋求正解编辑意思!虽知已拒!

Dear Dr. qiang,

Thank you for submitting your above-mentioned paper to Acta Materialia. As the Coordinating Editor of Acta Materialia, I receive all submitted papers. It is my responsibility to examine all papers before sending them to different editors for processing. Since in recent times, the number of submissions has increased substantially, I use my judgment in dividing the submitted papers into two categories: to be processed and not to be processed. This is to maintain a reasonable workload for the editors and the reviewers. I am afraid your paper fell into the latter category.

My decision for a paper for "not to be processed" is based on several criteria: the quality of writing; the review of relevant literature in the Introduction Section: the length of the article (we do not publish short articles in Acta because we have Scripta Materialia for that purpose); the match with aims and scope of Acta; and the advancement of existing knowledge base.

I have decided not to further process your manuscript because:

- the relevant published literature is not critically reviewed.
- the English grammar and syntax are not satisfactory. Overall, the writing is not optimal and not up to the standards of Acta Materialia.
- it is short for an Acta submission and does not contain sufficient new results, techniques or theories relevant to the field your manuscript addresses to warrant publication as a full paper in Acta Materialia.
- it does not have a good fit with the aims and scope of Acta Materialia.

Thank you for your interest in publishing in Acta Materialia.

Yours sincerely,

Subhash Mahajan
Assigning Editor
Acta Materialia
回复此楼
再牛逼似的梦想也挡不住傻逼似的坚持
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

likeupp

新虫 (正式写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
这个杂志要求很高,你的初审没通过
9楼2009-07-12 17:31:01
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 16 个回答

green1223

木虫 (职业作家)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
虽然我不知道什么意思 ,  但是楼主的想法我很支持   祝你好运!
2楼2009-07-12 16:28:02
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

prrsw

金虫 (正式写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
格式不符合要,内容不够创新,长度不够,等理由,不进入审稿环节,楼主继续努力
4楼2009-07-12 16:36:21
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

vazz77


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
- the relevant published literature is not critically reviewed.
这一句什么意思?
5楼2009-07-12 16:44:12
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 小木虫上这么多卖论文的,真有人买论文么?感觉没必要啊 +7 Tide man 2026-08-10 7/350 2026-08-11 14:56 by yaakov0323
[论文投稿] 职称评审,求友友推荐见刊最快的期刊 +3 工厂打螺丝 2026-08-08 3/150 2026-08-11 13:42 by 会议编辑
[基金申请] FileCode能看出啥? +7 要乐观耀哥 2026-08-10 17/850 2026-08-11 10:50 by 要乐观耀哥
[基金申请] 我的国基提前知道中了,可是同事的操作让我实在接受不了,怎么会有这样的人 +8 家与远方 2026-08-10 13/650 2026-08-11 09:49 by 家与远方
[基金申请] 确定了,国自然21号放榜 +6 布布和一二 2026-08-10 7/350 2026-08-10 19:15 by 2000zf36392
[基金申请] 综述论文作为代表作会不会影响评审专家的印象分? +10 yufeiwaner 2026-08-09 11/550 2026-08-10 18:47 by yufeiwaner
[基金申请] 关于代码变化问题,想知道的进来 +17 且听虎啸 2026-08-07 24/1200 2026-08-10 18:35 by zhangduo2008
[基金申请] 静等基金结果 +5 gjjjzhong 2026-08-10 16/800 2026-08-10 17:19 by Tide man
[基金申请] 关于Filecode分析方法 +3 majunge000 2026-08-10 3/150 2026-08-10 15:46 by lch2012
[基金申请] 好奇怪的filecode +4 布布和一二 2026-08-08 5/250 2026-08-10 14:20 by 冰心玉壶晴
[基金申请] 据悉今年马上要出结果了 +7 瞬息宇宙 2026-08-10 8/400 2026-08-10 12:42 by Vivilian
[基金申请] 2026国自然放榜时间 +9 布布和一二 2026-08-08 9/450 2026-08-10 11:22 by xxxx2020
[基金申请] filecode与中标关系的预测 +5 布布和一二 2026-08-07 5/250 2026-08-09 16:15 by 袁向阳007
[基金申请] fileCode有新解读? +10 Tide man 2026-08-08 18/900 2026-08-09 12:55 by 仁砚薪传
[基金申请] 关于filecode +4 布布和一二 2026-08-07 7/350 2026-08-07 22:55 by zhanghaozhu
[基金申请] 化学口download_prp&fileCode的固定段好像这几天一直没变,有变的大神么? +3 Tide man 2026-08-07 4/200 2026-08-07 22:39 by Tide man
[基金申请] filecode变化情况 +6 布布和一二 2026-08-07 22/1100 2026-08-07 14:45 by 且听虎啸
[基金申请] filecode +8 布布和一二 2026-08-06 11/550 2026-08-06 20:41 by tangpu318
[基金申请] 影响面上的因素 +8 布布和一二 2026-08-05 11/550 2026-08-06 10:41 by 宝贝虫子
[基金申请] 好消息?这个有何含义??? +8 Tide man 2026-08-05 10/500 2026-08-05 16:14 by xmuxiaoyu
信息提示
请填处理意见