| 查看: 940 | 回复: 15 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
xqbeyond木虫 (著名写手)
斗士
|
[交流]
谋求正解编辑意思！虽知已拒！
|
||
|
Dear Dr. qiang, Thank you for submitting your above-mentioned paper to Acta Materialia. As the Coordinating Editor of Acta Materialia, I receive all submitted papers. It is my responsibility to examine all papers before sending them to different editors for processing. Since in recent times, the number of submissions has increased substantially, I use my judgment in dividing the submitted papers into two categories: to be processed and not to be processed. This is to maintain a reasonable workload for the editors and the reviewers. I am afraid your paper fell into the latter category. My decision for a paper for "not to be processed" is based on several criteria: the quality of writing; the review of relevant literature in the Introduction Section: the length of the article (we do not publish short articles in Acta because we have Scripta Materialia for that purpose); the match with aims and scope of Acta; and the advancement of existing knowledge base. I have decided not to further process your manuscript because: - the relevant published literature is not critically reviewed. - the English grammar and syntax are not satisfactory. Overall, the writing is not optimal and not up to the standards of Acta Materialia. - it is short for an Acta submission and does not contain sufficient new results, techniques or theories relevant to the field your manuscript addresses to warrant publication as a full paper in Acta Materialia. - it does not have a good fit with the aims and scope of Acta Materialia. Thank you for your interest in publishing in Acta Materialia. Yours sincerely, Subhash Mahajan Assigning Editor Acta Materialia |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
2025年遐想
已经有5人回复
-
论文终于录用啦！满足毕业条件了
已经有12人回复
-
投稿Elsevier的杂志（返修），总是在选择OA和subscription界面被踢皮球
已经有8人回复
-
求个博导看看
已经有18人回复
9楼2009-07-12 17:31:01
2楼2009-07-12 16:28:02
4楼2009-07-12 16:36:21
5楼2009-07-12 16:44:12