24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1160  |  回复: 1

stddddddd

银虫 (小有名气)

[交流] Sir Issac Newton-one of the most influential scientists of all time

Newton’s Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica

No work of science has drawn more attention from philosophers than Newton's Principia. The reasons for this, however, and consequently the focus of the attention have changed significantly from one century to the next. During the 20th Century, philosophers have viewed the Principia in the context of Einstein's new theory of gravity in his theory of general relativity. The main issues have concerned the relation between Newton's and Einstein's theories of gravity and what the need to replace the former with the latter says about the nature, scope, and limits of scientific knowledge. During most of the 18th Century, by contrast, Newton's theory of gravity remained under dispute, especially because of the absence of a mechanism — in particular, a contact mechanism — producing gravitational forces. The philosophic literature correspondingly endeavored to clarify and to resolve, one way or the other, the dispute over whether the Principia should or should not be viewed as methodologically well founded. By the 1790s Newton's theory of gravity had become established among those engaged in research in orbital mechanics and physical geodesy, leading to the Principia becoming the exemplar of science at its most successful. Philosophic interest in the Principia during the 19th Century, therefore, came to focus on how Newton had achieved this success, in part to characterize the knowledge that had been achieved and in part to pursue comparable knowledge in other areas of research. Unfortunately, a very large fraction of the philosophic literature in all three centuries has suffered from a quite simplistic picture of the Principia itself. The main goal of this entry is to replace that simplistic picture with one that does more justice to the richness of both the content and the methodology of the Principia.

有兴趣的虫友,可以读读大牛的原著
回复此楼

» 本帖附件资源列表

» 猜你喜欢

乘云气,御飞龙,而游乎四海之外
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

Scott_

银虫 (小有名气)

Newton, a distinguishing scientist, is yet a notorious rascal. He hogged the credit, downplayed what  Leibniz had done, and  defamed him, this is hard to accept.
2楼2019-04-09 22:51:44
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 stddddddd 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见