| 查看: 1385 | 回复: 1 | |||
[交流]
Sir Issac Newton-one of the most influential scientists of all time
|
|
Newton’s Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica No work of science has drawn more attention from philosophers than Newton's Principia. The reasons for this, however, and consequently the focus of the attention have changed significantly from one century to the next. During the 20th Century, philosophers have viewed the Principia in the context of Einstein's new theory of gravity in his theory of general relativity. The main issues have concerned the relation between Newton's and Einstein's theories of gravity and what the need to replace the former with the latter says about the nature, scope, and limits of scientific knowledge. During most of the 18th Century, by contrast, Newton's theory of gravity remained under dispute, especially because of the absence of a mechanism — in particular, a contact mechanism — producing gravitational forces. The philosophic literature correspondingly endeavored to clarify and to resolve, one way or the other, the dispute over whether the Principia should or should not be viewed as methodologically well founded. By the 1790s Newton's theory of gravity had become established among those engaged in research in orbital mechanics and physical geodesy, leading to the Principia becoming the exemplar of science at its most successful. Philosophic interest in the Principia during the 19th Century, therefore, came to focus on how Newton had achieved this success, in part to characterize the knowledge that had been achieved and in part to pursue comparable knowledge in other areas of research. Unfortunately, a very large fraction of the philosophic literature in all three centuries has suffered from a quite simplistic picture of the Principia itself. The main goal of this entry is to replace that simplistic picture with one that does more justice to the richness of both the content and the methodology of the Principia. 有兴趣的虫友，可以读读大牛的原著 |
回复此楼» 本帖附件资源列表
-
欢迎监督和反馈：小木虫仅提供交流平台，不对该内容负责。
本内容由用户自主发布，如果其内容涉及到知识产权问题，其责任在于用户本人，如对版权有异议，请联系邮箱：xiaomuchong@tal.com - 附件 1 : Philosophiæ_Naturalis_Principia_Mathematica_by_isaac_newton.epub
- 附件 2 : Philosophiæ_Naturalis_Principia_Mathematica.mobi
- 附件 3 : Philosophiæ_Naturalis_Principia_Mathematica.pdf
- 附件 4 : philosophiae-naturalis-principia-mathematica.pdf
2019-03-10 00:31:30, 1.86 M
2019-03-10 00:31:57, 4.79 M
2019-03-10 00:32:13, 3.83 M
2019-03-10 00:35:28, 11.74 M
» 猜你喜欢
面上没中，邀请各位路过的虫友分析一下分数
已经有7人回复
-
哈尔滨工业大学韩晓军教授课题组招收2027年硕士推免生及博士研究生
已经有3人回复
-
找导师
已经有8人回复
-
国社科又开始会评了，不知道这次命运如何
已经有14人回复
-
麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见（F口面上）
已经有13人回复
-
科研人应该花精力去思考如何解决问题，而不是去凝练问题
已经有14人回复
-
要骂人了，新模版改版就是要淡化问题凝练这种虚的东西，结果有个评委还在说凝练得不够
已经有17人回复
-
学科评审组评审是指会评吗？
已经有5人回复
-
小白求助 投论文要求的highlights应该如何写
已经有4人回复
-
面上意见出来了
已经有23人回复
2楼2019-04-09 22:51:44