24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 505  |  回复: 0
当前主题已经存档。

geology1657

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)

[交流] 【转帖】关于TAS岩石分类图解的问题

Dear colleague:

Good to know of your work that uses or could use the TAS diagram for volcanic rock classification. It seems that most people are not strictly following the IUGS recommendations for using the TAS diagram. One basic requirement, among others, is to “correctly” subdivide the iron content into the two oxidation varieties (FeO and Fe2O3) and then adjust the major element data to 100% on an anhydrous basis. This is mostly true because Fe is generally measured as total iron (as Fe2O3t or FeOt).

For enabling earth scientists to easily use the TAS diagram and to standardize the procedures involved, we wrote a computer program SINCLAS, about which we would like to draw your kind attention (see the reference by Verma et al., 2002).

Furthermore, to standardize the CIPW norm computations also required by the IUGS scheme, especially for identifying alkaline and sub-alkaline magmas, we published a detailed step-by-step procedure (see Verma et al., 2003), which we fully incorporated into our computer program SINCLAS. Please examine the following two papers for your future work. If you have any difficulty in obtaining them or downloading SINCLAS, I will be glad to send them to you.

Verma, S. P., Torres-Alvarado, I. S., and Sotelo-Rodríguez, Z. T. (2002) SINCLAS: Standard igneous norm and volcanic rock classification system. Computers & Geosciences, 28 (5): 711-715. [this program can be downloaded from:http://www.iamg.org/CGEditor/index.htm, or requested from the author.]

Verma, S. P., Torres-Alvarado, I. S., and Velasco-Tapia, F. (2003) A revised CIPW norm. Schweizerische Mineralogische Und Petrographische Mitteilungen, 83 (2): 197-216.

We will be glad to see that you and others use this freely available utility, and to have our effort cited in your future papers.

We are in the process of writing a more versatile computer program for the classification of all kinds of igneous rocks, of course strictly following the IUGS recommendations. It should be ready for distribution sometime during 2008.

Thank you very much for your kind attention.
With best wishes,
Surendra P. Verma (spv@cie.unam.mx)
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 geology1657 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[博后之家] 售SCI文章,我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急 +3 ero8OE6tv9cu 2026-09-02 6/300 2026-09-02 23:59 by rM1TE0WVDIIY
[基金申请] 为什么资助数各大高校都创新高,自己申请怎么就这么难 +14 Kittylucky 2026-08-27 15/750 2026-09-02 19:35 by liumei0601
[基金申请] 科研人应该花精力去思考如何解决问题,而不是去凝练问题 +7 瞬息宇宙 2026-09-01 14/700 2026-09-02 17:33 by ma0526
[基金申请] 要骂人了,新模版改版就是要淡化问题凝练这种虚的东西,结果有个评委还在说凝练得不够 +9 瞬息宇宙 2026-08-31 17/850 2026-09-02 14:04 by anjeeshine
[基金申请] 基金系统什么内容也没有 30+4 winsaint 2026-08-27 10/500 2026-09-02 11:35 by 大不刘6
[基金申请] 学科评审组评审是指会评吗? +5 瞬息宇宙 2026-08-31 5/250 2026-09-02 10:13 by 雨冰共舞
[论文投稿] 小白求助 投论文要求的highlights应该如何写 5+3 l1963982152 2026-08-29 4/200 2026-09-01 09:04 by 北京莱茵编辑
[基金申请] 麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见(F口面上) +7 gdd2018 2026-08-28 12/600 2026-09-01 08:32 by 尼古拉斯小虫
[基金申请] 国社科又开始会评了,不知道这次命运如何 +7 雨打竹帘 2026-08-30 11/550 2026-08-31 23:16 by hittle2008
[基金申请] 基金未中,这种答复是模板吗? +6 zhaosm1982 2026-08-27 7/350 2026-08-31 21:18 by qdxxmc
[基金申请] 面上意见出来了 +12 黄鸟于飞Chao 2026-08-29 23/1150 2026-08-31 18:57 by 黄鸟于飞Chao
[基金申请] 能否申诉? +7 echo8914667 2026-08-30 8/400 2026-08-31 17:00 by yihongxu
[基金申请] 中青基了要发朋友圈吗? +7 349506619 2026-08-28 7/350 2026-08-31 13:39 by 冼亮淀粉酶
[基金申请] 29号明天会评吗 +4 笨笨唐 2026-08-28 4/200 2026-08-31 09:30 by huixian257
[基金申请] 为什么到现在没收到通知? +5 tannykie 2026-08-29 5/250 2026-08-30 21:05 by purplejack
[基金申请] 有没有仍没收到信息的 +7 德尚中行 2026-08-27 8/400 2026-08-30 20:52 by purplejack
[考博] 找导师 +6 yuanjiabao 2026-08-29 7/350 2026-08-30 14:40 by 生科新手
[基金申请] 我就是申请一个面上项目而已,这评审意见是按照杰青的条件评的吧? +6 gouxfjh 2026-08-28 11/550 2026-08-30 07:57 by gouxfjh
[基金申请] 国自然评审意见 +13 wangmingqi 2026-08-28 19/950 2026-08-29 10:22 by Poppy1104
[基金申请] 2026年叶企孙基金 +4 bud_bud 2026-08-27 7/350 2026-08-29 07:23 by foolishmani
信息提示
请填处理意见