| 查看: 6768 | 回复: 43 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[求助]
两个审稿人和编辑意见是这样的，最后给了major revise文章可能接受吗，多少可能性 已有7人参与
|
|||
|
Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: The paper is good with a lot of work behind. Some welding experiments would be useful to contrast the simulation. Reviewer #2: This paper proposed a new way to improve the mechanical properties of the base metal and CG heat-affect zone。。。. This is in fact an interesting work with new findings and broad applications, which should merit the publication in the杂志名。。。。 The reviewer recommends the publication upon some minor points to be addressed: 1. Page 10. Fig. 3(c) is not clear, the figure mark "(c)" should not cover the data. The other letters in this figure are also not clear, which should be replaced and re-organized. 2. There should be a space between the number and unit in the whole manuscript. For example, at page 12, "228.8MPa" should be "228.8 MPa". I suggest the author correct this writing format and make sure all numbers and units consistent throughout the whole manuscript. Page 13, in Fig. 6, "engineering stress" and "engineering stain" should be "Engineering Stress" and "Engineering Strain" respectively. And the scale should be clear. 3. It would be better to quantify and summarize the distribution of。。。 in the processed steel. 4. Page 17, there should be a space between "Fig.9."and "Growth" in line 3. 5. The English is overall OK, but still needs some polishing, for instance, the abstract is kind of lengthy with too much technical details.. 6. Since the major advantage is improved mechanical properties, but to me there is only one result (Figure 6) talked about the quantitative number of mechanical improvement. It would be better to present more systematic mechanical testing data in figure or table, with error bar or range of values. Additional comments (Subject Editor): Title: I think it is unnecessarily long. It should not read like a mini paper. Keep in mind that the abstract always accompanies the title. A title must be as accurate, informative and as comprehensive as possible, yet as short as possible in order to attract the reader's attention, but without wasting words (hence journal's space and reader's time). Please shorten it to about 10 words max. I suggest adding the word "welding" to the list of keywords. Style of References: The authors should follow the reference protocol dictated by 杂志名. References should not be in lists or appended at the end of sentences. Each one of the cited sources must be discussed individually and explicitly to demonstrate their significance to your study. We ask that you use the authors' surnames as the subject of a verb, and then state in one or two sentences what they claim, what evidence they provide to support their claim, and how you evaluate their work. You must change your paper to meet this requirement for every reference you cite. Section headings tend to be too long and repetitive. Please shorten them to no more than 5 words each. Avoid unnecessary repetitions ( E.g. "mechanical properties of..." right under "mechanical properties" 第一次投稿，不是很清楚。编辑的态度严厉吗？ |
回复此楼» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
 审稿意见及相关 |
» 猜你喜欢
咱们一起用铁证分析2026国家社科基金中标与否
已经有22人回复
-
是这周出结果还是下周出结果？
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有6人回复
-
欢迎发来filecode的Mz6后的代码验证其规律
已经有49人回复
-
哪位老哥知道今年的国自然具体哪一天放榜？
已经有5人回复
-
各位道友，我要去昆明玩几天，回来见。
已经有7人回复
-
filecode
已经有10人回复
-
奇怪，两个人的filecode固定段从头到尾一模一样
已经有11人回复
-
有时候，自然基金真的不能太认真 （我的申报经验）
已经有8人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 审稿人和编辑的意见我一直没有弄明白什么意思
已经有4人回复
- 修改意见返回后因为论文题目相近被拒，已申诉，求助
已经有6人回复
- 面临毕业压力，一篇英文第三次修改了，我怎么催编辑好？
已经有29人回复
- 编辑这样的意见怎么修改啊，向各位求助了
已经有6人回复
- proof对编辑和审稿人的致谢
已经有4人回复
- 两个审稿人及编辑意见不一致时，咋办？
已经有3人回复
- 两篇SCI论文投稿的过程及感想《原创》
已经有169人回复
- ASME Journal of Heat Transfer 审稿意见交流
已经有144人回复
- 【求助求助】马上要申请了，Offer抉择，急求意见...
已经有26人回复
- 找不到审稿人！！！郁闷！！！
已经有10人回复
- 【有奖咨询】！！请大家帮我看看该如何回复审稿人的这几条意见，必倾囊告谢！
已经有1人回复
- 请教如何修改更好
已经有2人回复
- 一位很牛的审稿人给出的论文写作建议-----“如何写好论文？”
已经有128人回复
- 两连拒，我怒了！
已经有48人回复
- 重金求助如何回答审稿人提出的改投它刊的建议
已经有14人回复
- 狂牛作者----考验审稿人
已经有65人回复
- 关于科研不得不说
已经有61人回复
- 论文投稿常见问题答疑
已经有202人回复
- 三年六篇sci检索文章的经验
已经有415人回复
wangxiaomail
木虫 (职业作家)
- 应助: 369 (硕士)
- 金币: 58.7
- 散金: 6828
- 红花: 62
- 帖子: 3859
- 在线: 207.5小时
- 虫号: 3635789
- 注册: 2015-01-09
- 专业: 高分子科学
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
lxisme: 金币+15, ★★★很有帮助 2016-11-03 15:24:41
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
lxisme: 金币+15, ★★★很有帮助 2016-11-03 15:24:41
|
基本上都是正面的评价，按要求修改基本就能被接收。 发自小木虫Android客户端 |
6楼2016-11-03 14:39:07
2楼2016-11-03 13:05:27
|
祝福！ 发自小木虫Android客户端 |
3楼2016-11-03 13:12:28
xysong6597
新虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1323.7
- 红花: 5
- 帖子: 765
- 在线: 34.3小时
- 虫号: 4498824
- 注册: 2016-03-13
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 电磁场与波
4楼2016-11-03 13:16:27
