| ²é¿´: 1691 | »Ø¸´: 6 | |||
johnd1гæ (³õÈëÎÄ̳)
|
[½»Á÷]
ÐÂÈ˵ÚÒ»´Î¸øAIP ADVANCES Ͷ¸å£¬Çë¸÷λ³æÓѺʹóÅ£°ïæ¿´¿´ÕâÒâ¼û»¹ÓÐϷûϷ ÒÑÓÐ4È˲ÎÓë
|
|
СµÜ½ñÄê10ÔÂͶ¸åJAP£¬±à¼½¨ÒéתͶµ½AIP ADVANCES£¬µÚÒ»´ÎÉó¸åºóÒâ¼ûÈçÏ£º Reviewer Comments: Reviewer #1 Evaluations: RECOMMENDATION: Publish with mandatory revision (minor) Original Paper required: Yes Well Organized and Clear required : Yes Free From Errors required : No Conclusions Supported required : Yes Satisfactory English required : Yes Appropriate Title required : Yes Good Abstract required : Yes Clear Figures required : No Adequate References required : No AIP Advances is an appropriate journal for this paper, because this paper addressed the study of thermal and electrical characteristics of the XXX. Although this work seems very interesting, several points need be addressed to increase the strength of the paper: 1. The authors didn't explain well how good the performance of their XXX is compared with those in the previous studies, and what are their XXX's advantages over those reported in the literatures. The ingenuity and the impact of the paper are doubtful. 2. The theoretical part of the manuscript is not written in a rigorous way. The authors didn't explain the meanings of each symbol in the equations. They also didn't describe how the simulations in section 2.3 and 3 were done, including the equations they used, the parameter values they chose, the boundary conditions they applied, and even a clear computational geometry. 3. The qualities of images are all very low. I suggest that the authors redraw those figures and improve the image quality. Çë¸÷λ´óÅ£³æÓѰïæ¿´¿´£¬ÕâÆªÎÄÕÂÊDz»ÊÇÒѾû¾ÈÁË£¬»¹ÊÇ˵ÈÔÈ»´æÁôÒ»ÏßÏ£Íû£¿ °ÝÍдó¼Ò£¡£¡£¡ |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8 O5 51O 54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
ΪʲôÖйú´óѧ¹¤¿Æ½ÌÊÚÃÇË®ÁËÄÇô¶àËùνµÄ¶¥»á¶¥¿¯£¬µ«»¹ÊÇ×ö²»³öÓîÊ÷»úÆ÷ÈË£¿
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8 O5 51O 54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8 O5 51O 54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8 O5 51O 54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8 O5 51O 54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8 O5 51O 54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8 O5 51O 54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8 O5 51O 54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8 O5 51O 54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
pingcne
ľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 29 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 2295.2
- É¢½ð: 10
- ºì»¨: 6
- Ìû×Ó: 706
- ÔÚÏß: 637.4Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 616640
- ×¢²á: 2008-10-04
- רҵ: ¹â×ÓÓë¹âµç×ÓÆ÷¼þ
2Â¥2015-12-17 15:57:16
ÓîÖDz¨ÑÜ
ͳæ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 16 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 12141.5
- É¢½ð: 2500
- ºì»¨: 4
- Ìû×Ó: 2699
- ÔÚÏß: 185.1Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 2464487
- ×¢²á: 2013-05-14
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ÐÄÀíѧÆäËûѧ¿Æ
¡ï
Сľ³æ: ½ð±Ò+0.5, ¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû
Сľ³æ: ½ð±Ò+0.5, ¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû
|
ÎÊÌâ²»´ó£¬ÊÊºÏÆÚ¿¯¡¡¸ù¾ÝÒâ¼ûºÃºÃ¸Ä£¬Ìá½»Ð޸ĸåµÄʱºò£¬ÖðÌõ»Ø¸´Éó¸åÈË£¬Ï£ÍûºÜ´ó£¡ ·¢×ÔСľ³æAndroid¿Í»§¶Ë |
3Â¥2015-12-17 16:08:18
johnd1
гæ (³õÈëÎÄ̳)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 26
- Ìû×Ó: 7
- ÔÚÏß: 1.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 2843169
- ×¢²á: 2013-12-02
- רҵ: °ëµ¼Ìå΢ÄÉ»úµçÆ÷¼þÓëϵͳ
|
´óÅ£ÄúºÃ£¡ÇëÎÊÒ»°ãÃæ¶Ô¡°The authors didn't explain well how good the performance of their XXX is compared with those in the previous studies, and what are their XXX's advantages over those reported in the literatures. The ingenuity and the impact of the paper are doubtful.¡±ÕâÖÖÎÊÌâÓÐʲô¾ÑéÀ´»Ø¸´ÄØ£¿ÐÂÈ˵ÚÒ»´ÎͶSCI£¬ºÜ¶à²»¶®£¬»¹Ï£Íû´óÅ£Ö¸½Ì£¡ |
4Â¥2015-12-17 20:33:24
johnd1
гæ (³õÈëÎÄ̳)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 26
- Ìû×Ó: 7
- ÔÚÏß: 1.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 2843169
- ×¢²á: 2013-12-02
- רҵ: °ëµ¼Ìå΢ÄÉ»úµçÆ÷¼þÓëϵͳ
5Â¥2015-12-18 09:08:16
kqp1982
ľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 41 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 1617.8
- É¢½ð: 1693
- ºì»¨: 18
- Ìû×Ó: 1214
- ÔÚÏß: 484.2Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 112015
- ×¢²á: 2005-11-21
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: »¯Ñ§¹¤³Ì¼°¹¤Òµ»¯Ñ§
6Â¥2015-12-18 13:40:40
Mtime1992
гæ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 1110.4
- É¢½ð: 11
- ºì»¨: 1
- Ìû×Ó: 110
- ÔÚÏß: 32.4Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 3475663
- ×¢²á: 2014-10-15
- רҵ: ÐÇϵºÍÀàÐÇÌå
7Â¥2016-03-03 09:17:29













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥