| 查看: 1594 | 回复: 6 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
新人第一次给AIP ADVANCES 投稿，请各位虫友和大牛帮忙看看这意见还有戏没戏已有4人参与
|
|||
|
小弟今年10月投稿JAP，编辑建议转投到AIP ADVANCES，第一次审稿后意见如下： Reviewer Comments: Reviewer #1 Evaluations: RECOMMENDATION: Publish with mandatory revision (minor) Original Paper required: Yes Well Organized and Clear required : Yes Free From Errors required : No Conclusions Supported required : Yes Satisfactory English required : Yes Appropriate Title required : Yes Good Abstract required : Yes Clear Figures required : No Adequate References required : No AIP Advances is an appropriate journal for this paper, because this paper addressed the study of thermal and electrical characteristics of the XXX. Although this work seems very interesting, several points need be addressed to increase the strength of the paper: 1. The authors didn't explain well how good the performance of their XXX is compared with those in the previous studies, and what are their XXX's advantages over those reported in the literatures. The ingenuity and the impact of the paper are doubtful. 2. The theoretical part of the manuscript is not written in a rigorous way. The authors didn't explain the meanings of each symbol in the equations. They also didn't describe how the simulations in section 2.3 and 3 were done, including the equations they used, the parameter values they chose, the boundary conditions they applied, and even a clear computational geometry. 3. The qualities of images are all very low. I suggest that the authors redraw those figures and improve the image quality. 请各位大牛虫友帮忙看看，这篇文章是不是已经没救了，还是说仍然存留一线希望？ 拜托大家！！！ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
博士读完未来一定会好吗
已经有34人回复
-
心脉受损
已经有8人回复
-
之前让一硕士生水了7个发明专利，现在这7个获批发明专利的维护费可从哪儿支出哈？
已经有9人回复
-
博士申请都是内定的吗？
已经有8人回复
-
读博
已经有5人回复
-
投稿精细化工
已经有4人回复
-
导师想让我从独立一作变成了共一第一
已经有9人回复
-
Springer期刊投稿求助
已经有4人回复
宇智波衍
铜虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 16 (小学生)
- 金币: 12141.5
- 散金: 2500
- 红花: 4
- 帖子: 2699
- 在线: 185.1小时
- 虫号: 2464487
- 注册: 2013-05-14
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 心理学其他学科
3楼2015-12-17 16:08:18
pingcne
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 29 (小学生)
- 金币: 2295.2
- 散金: 10
- 红花: 6
- 帖子: 706
- 在线: 636.1小时
- 虫号: 616640
- 注册: 2008-10-04
- 专业: 光子与光电子器件
2楼2015-12-17 15:57:16
|
大牛您好！请问一般面对“The authors didn't explain well how good the performance of their XXX is compared with those in the previous studies, and what are their XXX's advantages over those reported in the literatures. The ingenuity and the impact of the paper are doubtful.”这种问题有什么经验来回复呢？新人第一次投SCI，很多不懂，还希望大牛指教！  |
4楼2015-12-17 20:33:24
5楼2015-12-18 09:08:16