| 查看: 1601 | 回复: 6 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
新人第一次给AIP ADVANCES 投稿,请各位虫友和大牛帮忙看看这意见还有戏没戏已有4人参与
|
|||
|
小弟今年10月投稿JAP,编辑建议转投到AIP ADVANCES,第一次审稿后意见如下: Reviewer Comments: Reviewer #1 Evaluations: RECOMMENDATION: Publish with mandatory revision (minor) Original Paper required: Yes Well Organized and Clear required : Yes Free From Errors required : No Conclusions Supported required : Yes Satisfactory English required : Yes Appropriate Title required : Yes Good Abstract required : Yes Clear Figures required : No Adequate References required : No AIP Advances is an appropriate journal for this paper, because this paper addressed the study of thermal and electrical characteristics of the XXX. Although this work seems very interesting, several points need be addressed to increase the strength of the paper: 1. The authors didn't explain well how good the performance of their XXX is compared with those in the previous studies, and what are their XXX's advantages over those reported in the literatures. The ingenuity and the impact of the paper are doubtful. 2. The theoretical part of the manuscript is not written in a rigorous way. The authors didn't explain the meanings of each symbol in the equations. They also didn't describe how the simulations in section 2.3 and 3 were done, including the equations they used, the parameter values they chose, the boundary conditions they applied, and even a clear computational geometry. 3. The qualities of images are all very low. I suggest that the authors redraw those figures and improve the image quality. 请各位大牛虫友帮忙看看,这篇文章是不是已经没救了,还是说仍然存留一线希望? 拜托大家!!! |
» 猜你喜欢
职称评审没过,求安慰
已经有21人回复
垃圾破二本职称评审标准
已经有15人回复
投稿Elsevier的Neoplasia杂志,到最后选publishing options时页面空白,不能完成投稿
已经有20人回复
EST投稿状态问题
已经有7人回复
毕业后当辅导员了,天天各种学生超烦
已经有4人回复
聘U V热熔胶研究人员
已经有10人回复
求助文献
已经有3人回复
投稿返修后收到这样的回复,还有希望吗
已经有8人回复
三无产品还有机会吗
已经有6人回复
5楼2015-12-18 09:08:16
pingcne
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 29 (小学生)
- 金币: 2295.2
- 散金: 10
- 红花: 6
- 帖子: 706
- 在线: 636.1小时
- 虫号: 616640
- 注册: 2008-10-04
- 专业: 光子与光电子器件
2楼2015-12-17 15:57:16
宇智波衍
铜虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 16 (小学生)
- 金币: 12141.5
- 散金: 2500
- 红花: 4
- 帖子: 2699
- 在线: 185.1小时
- 虫号: 2464487
- 注册: 2013-05-14
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 心理学其他学科
3楼2015-12-17 16:08:18
|
大牛您好!请问一般面对“The authors didn't explain well how good the performance of their XXX is compared with those in the previous studies, and what are their XXX's advantages over those reported in the literatures. The ingenuity and the impact of the paper are doubtful.”这种问题有什么经验来回复呢?新人第一次投SCI,很多不懂,还希望大牛指教! ![]() |
4楼2015-12-17 20:33:24













回复此楼
