| 查看: 1684 | 回复: 6 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
新人第一次给AIP ADVANCES 投稿，请各位虫友和大牛帮忙看看这意见还有戏没戏 已有4人参与
|
|||
|
小弟今年10月投稿JAP，编辑建议转投到AIP ADVANCES，第一次审稿后意见如下： Reviewer Comments: Reviewer #1 Evaluations: RECOMMENDATION: Publish with mandatory revision (minor) Original Paper required: Yes Well Organized and Clear required : Yes Free From Errors required : No Conclusions Supported required : Yes Satisfactory English required : Yes Appropriate Title required : Yes Good Abstract required : Yes Clear Figures required : No Adequate References required : No AIP Advances is an appropriate journal for this paper, because this paper addressed the study of thermal and electrical characteristics of the XXX. Although this work seems very interesting, several points need be addressed to increase the strength of the paper: 1. The authors didn't explain well how good the performance of their XXX is compared with those in the previous studies, and what are their XXX's advantages over those reported in the literatures. The ingenuity and the impact of the paper are doubtful. 2. The theoretical part of the manuscript is not written in a rigorous way. The authors didn't explain the meanings of each symbol in the equations. They also didn't describe how the simulations in section 2.3 and 3 were done, including the equations they used, the parameter values they chose, the boundary conditions they applied, and even a clear computational geometry. 3. The qualities of images are all very low. I suggest that the authors redraw those figures and improve the image quality. 请各位大牛虫友帮忙看看，这篇文章是不是已经没救了，还是说仍然存留一线希望？ 拜托大家！！！ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
售SCI一区文章，我:8 O5 51O 54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8 O5 51O 54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有5人回复
-
为什么中国大学教授们水了那么多所谓的顶会顶刊，但还是做不出宇树机器人？
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8 O5 51O 54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8 O5 51O 54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8 O5 51O 54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
-
“人文社科而论，许多学术研究还没有达到民国时期的水平”
已经有5人回复
-
过年走亲戚时感受到了所开私家车的鄙视链
已经有11人回复
-
什么是人一生最重要的？
已经有4人回复
-
版面费该交吗
已经有3人回复
Mtime1992
新虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1110.4
- 散金: 11
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 110
- 在线: 32.4小时
- 虫号: 3475663
- 注册: 2014-10-15
- 专业: 星系和类星体
7楼2016-03-03 09:17:29
pingcne
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 29 (小学生)
- 金币: 2295.2
- 散金: 10
- 红花: 6
- 帖子: 706
- 在线: 637.4小时
- 虫号: 616640
- 注册: 2008-10-04
- 专业: 光子与光电子器件
2楼2015-12-17 15:57:16
宇智波衍
铜虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 16 (小学生)
- 金币: 12141.5
- 散金: 2500
- 红花: 4
- 帖子: 2699
- 在线: 185.1小时
- 虫号: 2464487
- 注册: 2013-05-14
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 心理学其他学科
3楼2015-12-17 16:08:18
|
大牛您好！请问一般面对“The authors didn't explain well how good the performance of their XXX is compared with those in the previous studies, and what are their XXX's advantages over those reported in the literatures. The ingenuity and the impact of the paper are doubtful.”这种问题有什么经验来回复呢？新人第一次投SCI，很多不懂，还希望大牛指教！  |
4楼2015-12-17 20:33:24