| ²é¿´: 496 | »Ø¸´: 1 | |||
| ±¾Ìû²úÉú 1 ¸ö ·ÒëEPI £¬µã»÷ÕâÀï½øÐв鿴 | |||
SunShine-91ľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
|
[ÇóÖú]
·ÒëÇóÖú
|
||
|
The oxidation resistance temperature of UFD/SiO2 composites was at least 140¡æ higher than that of the pristine UFDs, while it changed relatively little as the shell thickness increased from 10 nm to 50 nm and reached a maximum value around 597¡æ. higher than that of ÕâÀï¶ÔÂ𣿠relatively little ÊDz»ÊÇÓôíÁË£¬ÔõÃ´Ìæ»»£¿ reached a maximum value ÕâÑù±í´ïÊÇ·ñºÏÀí |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
±¾¿Æ211£¬293·ÖÇëÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
085600²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ25È˻ظ´
±¾9Ò»Ö¾Ô¸2 0854µÍ·Öר˶286Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
085600£¬320·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
316Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
0856µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
278Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
0703Çóµ÷¼Á383·Ö
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
400·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
085701Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´

Î人һÐÄÒ»Òë
¾èÖú¹ó±ö (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- ·ÒëEPI: 502
- Ó¦Öú: 8 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 2283.1
- É¢½ð: 5914
- ºì»¨: 32
- Ìû×Ó: 1665
- ÔÚÏß: 321.9Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 3587652
- ×¢²á: 2014-12-10
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ¸ß·Ö×Ӻϳɻ¯Ñ§
¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû
É̼ÒÒѾÖ÷¶¯ÉùÃ÷´Ë»ØÌû¿ÉÄܺ¬ÓÐÐû´«ÄÚÈÝ
¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï
SunShine-91: ½ð±Ò+10, ·ÒëEPI+1, ¡ï¡ï¡ï¡ï¡ï×î¼Ñ´ð°¸ 2015-06-23 15:38:07
SunShine-91: ½ð±Ò+10, ·ÒëEPI+1, ¡ï¡ï¡ï¡ï¡ï×î¼Ñ´ð°¸ 2015-06-23 15:38:07
|
The oxidation resistance temperature of UFD/SiO2 composites was at least 140¡æ higher than that of the pristine UFDs, while it changed relatively little as the shell thickness increased from 10 nm to 50 nm and reached a maximum value around 597¡æ. higher than that of ÕâÀï¶ÔÂ𣿠¿ÉÒÔÕâôд relatively little ÊDz»ÊÇÓôíÁË£¬ÔõÃ´Ìæ»»£¿ ¿ÉÒÔ£¬µ«ÊǸijÉwhile it barely changed as... reached a maximum value ÕâÑù±í´ïÊÇ·ñºÏÀí. ºÏÀí Õû¾äÒ²¿ÉÒÔÕâô¸ÄÏ£º Being at least 140¡æ higher than the oxidation resistance temperature of the pristine UFDs, the oxidation resistance temperature of UFD/SiO2 composites barely changed as the shell thickness increased from 10 nm to 50 nm and reached a maximum value around 597¡æ. |
2Â¥2015-06-23 09:50:24














»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥