24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

walryhao

铁虫 (初入文坛)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 37.8
散金: 10
帖子: 33
在线: 17.1小时
虫号: 3008144
注册: 2014-03-01
性别: GG
专业: 燃烧学

[交流] 各位虫友帮看下这个一审结果有戏么？看不懂这个revise的意思。。不吝感激！！已有18人参与

Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision.

For your guidance, reviewers' comments are appended below.

When submitting a revised manuscript, it must be accompanied by specific responses to the issues raised by each reviewer.  The revised paper will not be considered further unless it is accompanied by the following documentation of the author(s) specific responses to issues raised by each reviewer.  Example:

Reviewer 1

Issue 1:
A restatement or summary of the issue raised by the reviewer.

Discussion
A discussion or rebuttal of the issue raised by the reviewer (if necessary).

Non-specific statements such as "revised," "accepted," or "acknowledged," will not be accepted.

To submit a revision, please go to http://ees.elsevier.com/jfue/ and login as an Author.

Your username is: ******
If you need to retrieve password details, please go to: http://ees.elsevier.com/jfue/automail_query.asp

On your Main Menu page is a folder entitled "Submissions Needing Revision". You will find your submission record there.

When submitting your revised manuscript, please ensure that you upload the source files (e.g. Word). Uploading only a PDF file at this stage will create delays should your manuscript be finally accepted for publication.  If your revised submission does not include the source files, we will contact you to request them.

Please note that there is a strict deadline for revisions. If we have not received the manuscript within the due date, the paper will be withdrawn. Your revisions should be submitted by May 03, 2015.

Please note that this journal offers a new, free service called AudioSlides: brief, webcast-style presentations that are shown next to published articles on ScienceDirect (see also http://www.elsevier.com/audioslides). If your paper is accepted for publication, you will automatically receive an invitation to create an AudioSlides presentation.

Yours sincerely,

Baoqing Li, PhD
Associate Principal Editor
Fuel

Reviewer/Editor comments:

Reviewer #2:
This is an interesting study on the effects of electric field intensity and distribution on flame propagation, which has useful implications on combustion control and efficiency enhancement.
However, there are a few technical questions that are either unclear or missing. To help increase the value of this draft, the reviewer would like to see the proper addressing to the following
comments and questions:

1.
.
.
.
9.

Reviewer #3: This paper is well documented and the objective is very clear. Results and discussion can support the conclusion

24小时热门版块排行榜

[交流] 各位虫友帮看下这个一审结果有戏么？看不懂这个revise的意思。。不吝感激！！已有18人参与

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助: