24СʱÈÈÃŰæ¿éÅÅÐаñ    

Znn3bq.jpeg
±±¾©Ê¯ÓÍ»¯¹¤Ñ§Ôº2026ÄêÑо¿ÉúÕÐÉú½ÓÊÕµ÷¼Á¹«¸æ
²é¿´: 3098  |  »Ø¸´: 32
µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû

Èöµ©µÄ»³±§

ľ³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)


[½»Á÷] ËÄÇøsci£¬Ò»¸öÔºóÐÞ¸ÄÒâ¼û£¬major revise£¬Çë´óÉñ°ïÎÒ¿´¿´Ï£Íû´ó²»´ó°¡

Ò»¸öÔÂǰͶ¸å£¬½ñÌìÊÕµ½Òâ¼û£¬Ï£Íû´óÅ£ÃǰïÎÒ¿´¿´Õâ¸öÎÄÕÂĿǰºÃºÃÐÞ¸ÄÏ£ÍûÈçºÎ°¡£¬ÔÚϵÚÒ»´ÎͶ¸åsci£¬Ä¿Ç°Õâ¸öÂÛÎÄȷʵ»¹Ã»ÓÐʵÑ飬°¥£¡

Reviewers have now returned comments on your paper. Your manuscript, in its current form, is unacceptable for publication   Both Reviewers, albeit that Reviewer #1 provided limited feedback, require you to provide more details, validation, and clarification.  I have also examined the manuscript and agree with their assessments.  I am willing to consider a revised submission from you if, at a minimum, you thoroughly address all the issues stated by both Reviewers.
If you decide to revise the work, please submit a list of changes or a rebuttal against each point which is being raised when you submit the revised manuscript.  Please also highlight any changes and/or additions made in the revised submission.
I would hope you can submit your revised paper to the Journal by 20/04/2015. If this is not possible please make the Journal Office aware.

Kind regards,
Reviewer comments and recommendations:
Reviewer #1: I would like to see more details about the computational approach and the elements that were used as well as about the expected level of deviation between simulations and experimental data.
Reviewer #2: The paper has presented an interesting work in optimization. Since the optimization of traditional structure has been extensively studied, this paper should present its innovation in the new reinforced structure or optimization method. Currently, no direct test data in the paper are available to confirm the validation of the FE model. Moreover, it is not clear to the reviewer that how the optimization algorithm (MOPSO) is implemented and how it is superior to other methods (like NSGA-II). Overall, further work is needed for journal publication:

1. In section 5.3, the algorithms should be compared to other up-to-date methods such as NSGA-II, not old version of NSGA. If possible, provide the comparison of MOPSO results and the NSGA-II results (either using software or Software of Deb.).
2. Please indicate whether the authors developed the optimization algorithm (MOPSO) or use some software to implement the optimization process. Meanwhile, how the sampling number of 20 (Table 1) is chosen?
3. For the expression of objective function, please write in standard mathematical way, say min (f1, f2), and min -SEAm is suggested. Also, please check the  Fig.13, and indicate how to determine the preferred solution (i.e. the knee point) from the Pareto fronts for two-objective optimization problem except for some specific decision-making criteria.
4. How many hours for the CAE runs vs. surrogate model runs using RSM. What is the machine configuration?
5. Please indicate the meaning of symbols (<sigma>, <epsilon> in Fig.11

6. In the formulation (6), check the symbol p (lower case), or P?
7. Check the reference of tables, should be consistent (Table or Tab.).
»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥

» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶

» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹Ø¼ÛÖµÌùÍÆ¼ö£¬¶ÔÄúͬÑùÓаïÖú:

» ÇÀ½ð±ÒÀ²£¡»ØÌû¾Í¿ÉÒԵõ½:

²é¿´È«²¿É¢½ðÌù

ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

Èöµ©µÄ»³±§

ľ³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)


ÒýÓûØÌû:
21Â¥: Originally posted by sdgame at 2015-02-19 22:20:53
²»ÊÇÊÇ´óÐ޸ġ£ÐèÒªºÃºÃµÄÐÞ£¬ËµÄãÏÖÔÚµÄÎÄÕ»¹²»ÊʺϷ¢±í£¬ÐèÒªÌṩ´óÁ¿µÄ¶«Î÷²Å¿ÉÒÔ£¬

ÎÒÖªµÀ£¬ºÃ¶à¿ÉÒÔÐ޸ģ¬Ö»ÊÇÔÝʱȷʵûÓÐʵÑ飬°¥£¬±¯¾ç
23Â¥2015-02-19 22:22:13
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû
²é¿´È«²¿ 33 ¸ö»Ø´ð

sdgame

½û³æ (ÖªÃû×÷¼Ò)

¡ï
Сľ³æ: ½ð±Ò+0.5, ¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû
±¾ÌûÄÚÈݱ»ÆÁ±Î

13Â¥2015-02-19 21:43:46
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

sdgame

½û³æ (ÖªÃû×÷¼Ò)

±¾ÌûÄÚÈݱ»ÆÁ±Î

14Â¥2015-02-19 21:44:20
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû
¼òµ¥»Ø¸´
2015-02-19 21:16   »Ø¸´  
Èöµ©µÄ»³±§(½ð±Ò+1): лл²ÎÓë
¡¢ [ ·¢×ÔСľ³æ¿Í»§¶Ë ]
yuguiyan3Â¥
2015-02-19 21:17   »Ø¸´  
Èöµ©µÄ»³±§(½ð±Ò+1): лл²ÎÓë
£¬ [ ·¢×ÔСľ³æ¿Í»§¶Ë ]
yangwg80884Â¥
2015-02-19 21:20   »Ø¸´  
Èöµ©µÄ»³±§(½ð±Ò+1): лл²ÎÓë
. [ ·¢×ÔÊÖ»ú°æ http://muchong.com/3g ]
×î¾ßÈËÆøÈÈÌûÍÆ¼ö [²é¿´È«²¿] ×÷Õß »Ø/¿´ ×îºó·¢±í
[¿¼ÑÐ] 287Çóµ÷¼Á +7 Fnhc 2026-04-07 11/550 2026-04-07 22:32 by shanqishi
[¿¼ÑÐ] »¯¹¤Çóµ÷¼Á£¡ +24 RichLi_ 2026-04-06 24/1200 2026-04-07 17:17 by À¶ÔÆË¼Óê
[¿¼ÑÐ] 285Çóµ÷¼Á +16 ŶßϺôo 2026-04-04 16/800 2026-04-07 12:31 by 1018329917
[¿¼ÑÐ] 283Çóµ÷¼Á +18 A child 2026-04-04 18/900 2026-04-07 12:30 by 1018329917
[¿¼ÑÐ] 286Çóµ÷¼Á +20 Faune 2026-04-06 20/1000 2026-04-07 11:33 by Ê«Óë×ÔÓÉ
[¿¼ÑÐ] һ־Ը̫ԭÀí¹¤´óѧ¼ÆËã»ú¼¼Êõר˶348£¬Çóµ÷¼ÁÖ¸µ¼ +3 nexious 2026-04-05 3/150 2026-04-07 08:19 by jp9609
[˶²©¼ÒÔ°] 0856²ÄÁÏ»¯¹¤Çóµ÷¼Á£¬Ò»Ö¾Ô¸211£¬³õÊԳɼ¨349 +4 ½­»´±±Ô 2026-04-05 4/200 2026-04-06 22:44 by chenzhimin
[¿¼ÑÐ] 08600ÉúÎïÓëÒ½Ò©-327 +9 18755400796 2026-04-05 9/450 2026-04-06 22:35 by 52305043001
[¿¼ÑÐ] £¨µ÷¼Á£©Ò»Ö¾Ô¸±¨¿¼¹þ¶û±õ¹¤Òµ´óѧ0857×ÊÔ´Óë»·¾³×¨Òµ378·Ö¿¼Éú +7 ºÝºÝ¼ÓÓÍ 2026-04-05 8/400 2026-04-06 16:52 by momoð©
[¿¼ÑÐ] 085500»úеר˶³õÊÔ288Çóµ÷¼Á +3 GZJguo666- 2026-04-05 3/150 2026-04-05 18:06 by jkddd
[¿¼ÑÐ] 313Çóµ÷¼Á +5 º£ÈÕº£ÈÕ 2026-04-04 5/250 2026-04-05 15:52 by jndximd
[¿¼ÑÐ] 081200-11408-276ѧ˶Çóµ÷¼Á +4 ´Þwj 2026-04-04 5/250 2026-04-05 14:06 by imissbao
[¿¼ÑÐ] ²ÄÁϵ÷¼Á +9 ¸ï΢¹ð 2026-04-04 9/450 2026-04-05 08:27 by 544594351
[¿¼ÑÐ] 324Çóµ÷¼Á +14 ÏëÉÏѧÇóµ÷ 2026-04-02 15/750 2026-04-04 20:31 by Î޼ʵIJÝÔ­
[¿¼ÑÐ] Çóµ÷¼Á +3 ffyyu 2026-04-02 3/150 2026-04-04 19:03 by À¶ÔÆË¼Óê
[¿¼ÑÐ] 085601Ò»Ö¾Ô¸±±Àí325·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á +6 ÕÒµ÷¼Á£¬£¬ 2026-04-02 6/300 2026-04-03 22:20 by –¹Æ?
[¿¼ÑÐ] 266Çóµ÷¼Á +3 08µçÆø¹¤³Ì 2026-04-03 3/150 2026-04-03 14:05 by 1753564080
[¿¼ÑÐ] ÍÁľˮÀû328·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á +6 ¼²·çÖª¾¢²Ý666 2026-04-02 6/300 2026-04-03 11:38 by znian
[¿¼ÑÐ] 274Çóµ÷¼Á +10 Ѧ¶¨Ú̵Ļ¢¡£ 2026-04-01 10/500 2026-04-03 10:13 by tianyyysss
[¿¼ÑÐ] 309Çóµ÷¼Á +14 ´ô¹½²»ÊÇ´÷·ò 2026-04-02 14/700 2026-04-03 09:42 by À¶ÔÆË¼Óê
ÐÅÏ¢Ìáʾ
ÇëÌî´¦ÀíÒâ¼û