| 查看: 5016 | 回复: 36 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
starrywang新虫 (正式写手)
|
[交流]
投稿被拒，申诉回敬恶毒的审稿人！ 已有3人参与
|
||
|
某英文期刊投稿被拒，头尾两个审稿人意见中肯（小修或大修），中间一个审稿人把文章通篇驳斥了一通（态度非常不友好，而且不乏审稿人的各种学术错误和智商硬伤），最后来了一句LET ONE FINAL COMMENT: The authors seem that don't know the huge work made to date in the so-called western world, and already published in many papers. They don't know the real state-of-the-art. 本人自觉文章并非惊天地泣鬼神，但是在本研究领域属于沿着前人脚步往前走了明显的一步，且花费了大量的时间精力。这种低水平喷子审稿人还是第一次见到，坚决还击，抵制蠢货。呵呵，当然主要还是年轻气盛，斗斗法，看看能不能讨回个公道。 立帖为证，战况直播。 今天看文章状态已经回到审稿！感谢各位关心，后面希望有个正常的审稿人。 下面附上我的申诉信： Dear editor: Thank you for your effective work on the manuscript processing. I am sorry to learn that our manuscript was rejected based on the comment of the second reviewer who mentioned several times of "unacceptable" or "uncorrect" and "faults". However in our opinion, this reviewer seems to be lack of some common knowledge of waste incineration metal emission and made a lot of mistakes in his/her comment. Furthermore, we spent almost 7 months to finish these experiments just for the accuracy of data, but this reviewer said "The authors seem that don't know the huge work made to date in the so-called western world" without any reason. We have confidence in the usefulness, accuracy and forward position of our manuscript. So we don't think it is fair enough if our manuscript was rejected for the second reviewer's review which contains a lot of mistakes and personal abuse. We would like to ask if you could send it to a fourth referee for a review and then reconsider your decision. Thank you very much for your help! Our rebuttals to the second reviewer’s “unacceptable ", "uncorrect", “none!” and "faults” are as follows. We can provide a formal version containing references if necessary. ……………………具体针对问题的辩诉内容就不贴了。 抗争过，无悔恨。年轻不气盛更待何时。 [ Last edited by starrywang on 2015-1-14 at 09:11 ] ----------------------------------------------------------------- 状态改为：Revisions and Resubmissions Requested by Editorial Office 编辑让修改一下，然后发给第四个审稿人。 Thank you for submitting your manuscript for publication in Energy & Fuels and for your recent note regarding my original decision of rejection based upon the reviewer comments, which are enclosed here. As before, the reviewers have expressed serious reservations about this work that I don’t believe could be addressed through a standard major revision. In light of the comments received, I am unable to accept the manuscript for publication in Energy & Fuels in its current form. However, if further experimentation, analysis, and revisions allow you to address the referees concerns in full we would be happy to consider a new version submitted as a resubmission to this manuscript. Upon receipt of your comments and a revised draft, we will also invite a fourth reviewer to gain further perspective. Please upload a point by point response to all reviewer comments if you decide to resubmit. [ Last edited by starrywang on 2015-1-14 at 18:27 ] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 提交了修改后的稿子。response写了12页，也不算多。祝自己好运。 [ Last edited by starrywang on 2015-3-27 at 23:26 ] ………………………………………………………… 是时候给大家一个交代了，首先文章最近还是悲剧了感谢各位的关心鼓励和批评指教。resubmission之后又到了那位哥们手上，然后又是一顿喷………碰上这种审稿人人生也算是圆满了。他提的有的意见是好的，其他的比较无理取闹……得，我绕路走。 [ Last edited by starrywang on 2015-5-30 at 09:38 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
应该是93bebmhtak前后十一个字符比较关键
已经有10人回复
-
这样的filecode谁见过
已经有21人回复
-
filecode与中标关系的预测
已经有5人回复
-
关于代码变化问题，想知道的进来
已经有17人回复
-
fileCode有新解读？
已经有18人回复
-
关于filecode，很负责任的告诉大家
已经有7人回复
-
【2027博士申请】纳米药物递送方向
已经有5人回复
-
关于豆爷回答的JTJC与%2F数量
已经有7人回复
-
2026国自然放榜时间
已经有3人回复
-
国基金的申报应该改成非等额制，评价高的钱多评价低的钱少，但是增加资助率
已经有7人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 感觉被审稿人冤枉了，想申诉，请大家看看
已经有7人回复
- 总是被审稿人拒审
已经有11人回复
- 投稿被拒，想申述，申述的时候要把文章修改好吗？
已经有8人回复
- 文章被拒，审稿人意见有明显错误，如何申诉
已经有15人回复
- 关于被拒后文章投稿时，选择推荐审稿人的问题（急急急）
已经有24人回复
- 被拒稿但觉得审稿人的部分意见有错误提出申诉有希望吗？
已经有7人回复
- 审稿两个月被拒，是否要申诉？
已经有4人回复
- Physical review e投稿被拒，能申述吗？成功率多少？
已经有10人回复
- 论文被拒后申诉成功并最终录用
已经有33人回复
- 论文被拒稿，想发信给主编申诉，不知道申诉信该怎么写？
已经有8人回复
- 投稿直接被拒 我该申诉吗？
已经有7人回复
- 文章被拒了，两个审稿人意见完全相反，值得申诉么？
已经有45人回复
- 论文被拒后 如何申诉？
已经有16人回复
- 论文被拒想写一封申诉信件 求模板
已经有3人回复
- 被拒后，回复审稿人意见如何投出
已经有9人回复
- 圣诞前一天文章莫名其妙被拒稿，申诉成功后今天戏剧接收
已经有231人回复
- 有没有虫友被拒稿后写过申诉信？急需指点一下！
已经有5人回复
- 审稿人说大修，但是论文被拒，给编辑再发邮件申诉有用吗 7.19 更新
已经有30人回复
- 论文被拒申诉成功，以后的步骤是什么
已经有8人回复
- 文章被拒，是否申诉？
已经有25人回复
- 投稿被拒想申诉
已经有7人回复
- 终审遭退，可否向编辑申诉，如申诉，该如何写申诉信好呢？
已经有12人回复
- 如何增加Appeal的成功率！--文章被拒申诉成功的见解
已经有59人回复
 本帖仅楼主可见 |
3楼2015-01-08 16:45:42
★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
4楼2015-01-08 16:50:20
pkugaoshan
禁虫 (小有名气)
★ ★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
starrywang(自私的猫1988代发): 金币+1, 鼓励交流 2015-01-31 16:21:44
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
starrywang(自私的猫1988代发): 金币+1, 鼓励交流 2015-01-31 16:21:44
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
5楼2015-01-08 17:22:18
xxuguang
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 22 (小学生)
- 金币: 6704.3
- 散金: 10
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 541
- 在线: 36.3小时
- 虫号: 1631313
- 注册: 2012-02-21
- 专业: 农业水利
7楼2015-01-08 19:46:17
