24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 3951  |  回复: 41

wanggenlin

铁杆木虫 (正式写手)


[交流] Reject & Resubmit ,该怎么办呢

不知道主编的态度怎么样?我准备修改后,再投,不知道希望有多大

Your manuscript # APP-2014-08-2861 entitled "Property reinforcement of ABS by simultaneous incorporation of copper particles and multiwalled carbon nanotubes" which you submitted to the Journal of Applied Polymer Science, has been reviewed. While the referees find your work of some potential interest, they have raised concerns that are sufficiently important that they preclude publication of the work in the Journal of Applied Polymer Science, at least in its present form.

Should further research work allow you to address exhaustively these criticisms we would be happy to look at a revised manuscript (unless something similar has by then been accepted at our journal or appeared elsewhere).

The comments from reviewers are included at the bottom of this letter.

Please note that resubmitting your manuscript does not guarantee eventual acceptance, and that your resubmission will be subject to re-review by the reviewers before a decision is rendered.

If you choose to resubmit your manuscript, go to http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/app and login to your Author Center. Look for "Manuscripts with Decisions" and select "Create a Resubmission" located next to the manuscript number. Then, follow the steps for resubmitting your manuscript.

If you decide to submit a revised manuscript, it is mandatory that you respond in detail to each of the comments made by the reviewer(s) in the space provided. Please ensure that your response is reflected in the main text and you should use this space to document the changes you make to the original manuscript. Please review the attached document listing the file requirements for your revision.

IMPORTANT: We have your original files. When submitting (uploading) your revised manuscript, please delete the file(s) that you wish to replace and then upload the revised file(s).

May I take this opportunity to thank you for considering our Journal for the publication of your work. We hope that you will consider resubmitting your manuscript to the Journal.

With kind regards,


Dr. Brian Knapp
Executive Editor, Journal of Applied Polymer Science
bsknapp@gmail.com, brian.knapp@promerus.com


Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author:

Reviewer: 1

Comments to the Author
The manuscript, ‘property reinforcement of ABS by simultaneous incorporation of copper particles and multiwalled carbon nanotubes’ has numerous scientific and English errors, so it is not suitable to publish in Journal of Applied Polymer Science. The details of the errors it contains is listed below,
1. The title of the manuscripts does not reflect the contents of the manuscripts in a proper manner, in addition it is not suitable to use the short form like ABS instead of using its full as acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene, in the title.
2. In the first sentence of the abstract the word ‘detailedly’ has been used, this word does not have any proper meaning.
3. The sentence mentioned in Introduction, ‘Multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) are considered as a versatile conductive filler in the polymer composite industry compared with Cu due to its large aspect ratio, good intrinsic electrical conductivity and excellent chemical properties’ need citation of suitable reference or references.
4. It is stated that, ‘CuCl nanorods are successfully prepared because of the presence of nonionic surfactant polypropylene glycol (PPG-400), which have length up to about 100 nm with diameters ranging from 20 to 50 nm’ practically any rod shaped particles are visible in both TEM and SEM images.
5. The word Cu powder has been used many times, while Cu particle is a suitable word instead of Cu powders. Overall, the representation or English of the manuscript is poor, so the manuscript requires rewriting in a proper way.

Reviewer: 2

The authors report the synergistic effect of Cu and MWCNTs in decreasing the electrical resistivity of the Cu/MWCNT/ABS. The results are interesting; however, some details should be clarified:

1. MWNTs tend to agglomerated. In the experimental part, the authors should specify how to prepare the Cu/MWNT/ABS and MWNT/ABS composites.

2. Page 9, from Fig.5, we cannot see the nanotubes homogeneously dispersed in the matrix without agglomerates. The authors should offer further SEM or TEM micrographs to support this conclusion.

3. There is no scale or legend in Figure2. The figure caption for figure2 is ambiguous. We don’t known which is TEM or FESEM.

4. Figure8 is ambiguous. The authors can use different colour line for different samples.

5. There are some spelling or grammar mistakes in the text. For example, resistivity (line 17, page 9), reference (line 1, page 12). In table 1, it should be TGA, not TG.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
回帖支持 ( 显示支持度最高的前 50 名 )

hjr2002160

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)



wanggenlin(金币+1): 谢谢参与
一般情况下,让重新投稿说明编辑还是比较认可这个东东的,按照修改意见好好修改,还是比较有希望的
17楼2014-10-13 09:25:05
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

joli

铁杆木虫 (职业作家)



wanggenlin(金币+1): 谢谢参与
好好改改,重新投呗
18楼2014-10-13 09:25:15
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

tangjiguo

木虫 (职业作家)



wanggenlin(金币+1): 谢谢参与
添人气的!
5楼2014-10-13 09:02:17
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

hxgu

木虫 (正式写手)



wanggenlin(金币+1): 谢谢参与
第一个审稿人好像都说的是写作问题,第二个开始说interesting,说明印象还可以
所以你认真改,应该有希望,当然修改不能局限于审稿人指出的问题,其他类似的也得自己好好检查
19楼2014-10-13 09:27:43
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

aknuaa

木虫 (著名写手)



wanggenlin(金币+1): 谢谢参与
好好修改重投all the best!!!

[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
20楼2014-10-13 09:28:40
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

rb

木虫 (著名写手)



wanggenlin(金币+1): 谢谢参与
实际上是好消息。好好的修改,可以接收的。
我这里一个学生的评语3个评审中有一个是全面否定的,我去argue了,最后都接收发表了。
22楼2014-10-13 09:31:50
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

fln漂流瓶

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)



wanggenlin(金币+1): 谢谢参与
(☆_☆)

[ 发自小木虫客户端 ]
24楼2014-10-13 09:39:13
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

foxs2

木虫 (文坛精英)



wanggenlin(金币+1): 谢谢参与
加油
26楼2014-10-13 09:45:24
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wanggenlin

铁杆木虫 (正式写手)


引用回帖:
19楼: Originally posted by hxgu at 2014-10-13 09:27:43
第一个审稿人好像都说的是写作问题,第二个开始说interesting,说明印象还可以
所以你认真改,应该有希望,当然修改不能局限于审稿人指出的问题,其他类似的也得自己好好检查

提到的问题,好像都是小问题,可能文章的语言方面需要修改下
30楼2014-10-13 09:53:50
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

lppttkl

木虫 (著名写手)


35楼2014-10-13 11:09:35
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

雨梦无声

金虫 (著名写手)



小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
给你重投说明编辑对你的东西还是感兴趣的。按照审稿人意见逐条修改回答,能中的可能性比你第一次投大多了
36楼2014-10-13 11:53:25
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wwmwwm

银虫 (正式写手)


有挑战性的活
37楼2014-10-13 14:34:07
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

jjfengnju

金虫 (正式写手)



小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
相当于大修,认真修改,很有希望接收
39楼2014-10-16 18:49:04
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

jjfengnju

金虫 (正式写手)


会返给原来的审稿人的二审
40楼2014-10-16 18:50:20
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

在比喻日年

至尊木虫 (职业作家)



小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
这不算reject吧   只是让你修改  我和你情况差不多
41楼2014-10-19 10:13:44
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

lujinwen

新虫 (小有名气)



小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
意思是需要大修呢。。

[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
42楼2014-10-19 10:25:25
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
简单回复
2014-10-13 08:54   回复  
wanggenlin(金币+1): 谢谢参与
2014-10-13 08:56   回复  
wanggenlin(金币+1): 谢谢参与
dmbb4楼
2014-10-13 08:57   回复  
wanggenlin(金币+1): 谢谢参与
2014-10-13 09:07   回复  
wanggenlin(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福
jysun117楼
2014-10-13 09:15   回复  
wanggenlin(金币+1): 谢谢参与
spc088楼
2014-10-13 09:16   回复  
wanggenlin(金币+1): 谢谢参与
1
2014-10-13 09:16   回复  
wanggenlin(金币+1): 谢谢参与
2014-10-13 09:17   回复  
wanggenlin(金币+1): 谢谢参与
7
hydzp11楼
2014-10-13 09:17   回复  
wanggenlin(金币+1): 谢谢参与
tableman12楼
2014-10-13 09:18   回复  
wanggenlin(金币+1): 谢谢参与
阿桂金13楼
2014-10-13 09:18   回复  
wanggenlin(金币+1): 谢谢参与
2014-10-13 09:20   回复  
wanggenlin(金币+1): 谢谢参与
假大空15楼
2014-10-13 09:22   回复  
wanggenlin(金币+1): 谢谢参与
kkcs200616楼
2014-10-13 09:24   回复  
wanggenlin(金币+1): 谢谢参与
11
2014-10-13 09:28   回复  
wanggenlin(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福!
pepperp23楼
2014-10-13 09:37   回复  
wanggenlin(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福
雁南行25楼
2014-10-13 09:40   回复  
wanggenlin(金币+1): 谢谢参与
2014-10-13 09:48   回复  
wanggenlin(金币+1): 谢谢参与
2014-10-13 09:49   回复  
wanggenlin(金币+1): 谢谢参与
gorgan29楼
2014-10-13 09:51   回复  
wanggenlin(金币+1): 谢谢参与
2014-10-13 09:56   回复  
wanggenlin(金币+1): 谢谢参与
xiejf32楼
2014-10-13 10:00   回复  
wanggenlin(金币+1): 谢谢参与
1
jianing11933楼
2014-10-13 10:01   回复  
小虫199234楼
2014-10-13 10:05   回复  
2014-10-16 17:46   回复  
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 wanggenlin 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[考研] 279分求调剂 一志愿211 +13 chaojifeixia 2026-03-19 14/700 2026-03-21 10:28 by JineShine
[考研] 268求调剂 +7 简单点0 2026-03-17 7/350 2026-03-21 08:32 by JourneyLucky
[考研] 南昌大学材料专硕311分求调剂 +6 77chaselx 2026-03-20 6/300 2026-03-21 07:24 by JourneyLucky
[考研] 083200学硕321分一志愿暨南大学求调剂 +3 innocenceF 2026-03-17 3/150 2026-03-21 02:35 by JourneyLucky
[考研] 354求调剂 +5 Tyoumou 2026-03-18 8/400 2026-03-21 00:35 by JourneyLucky
[考研] 一志愿南昌大学,327分,材料与化工085600 +9 Ncdx123456 2026-03-19 9/450 2026-03-20 23:41 by lovewei0727
[考研] 一志愿 西北大学 ,070300化学学硕,总分287,双非一本,求调剂。 +4 晨昏线与星海 2026-03-19 4/200 2026-03-20 22:15 by JourneyLucky
[考研] 求调剂,一志愿:南京航空航天大学大学 ,080500材料科学与工程学硕,总分289分 +4 @taotao 2026-03-19 4/200 2026-03-20 22:14 by JourneyLucky
[考研] 材料与化工 322求调剂 +4 然11 2026-03-19 4/200 2026-03-20 22:12 by luoyongfeng
[考研] 一志愿西南交通 专硕 材料355 本科双非 求调剂 +5 西南交通专材355 2026-03-19 5/250 2026-03-20 21:10 by JourneyLucky
[考研] 295材料求调剂,一志愿武汉理工085601专硕 +5 Charlieyq 2026-03-19 5/250 2026-03-20 20:35 by JourneyLucky
[考研] 求调剂 +3 @taotao 2026-03-20 3/150 2026-03-20 19:35 by JourneyLucky
[考研] 086500 325 求调剂 +3 领带小熊 2026-03-19 3/150 2026-03-20 18:38 by 尽舜尧1
[考研] 286分人工智能专业请求调剂愿意跨考! +3 lemonzzn 2026-03-17 4/200 2026-03-20 11:04 by lemonzzn
[考研] 梁成伟老师课题组欢迎你的加入 +9 一鸭鸭哟 2026-03-14 11/550 2026-03-19 17:22 by !本暗一次!
[考研] 085601材料工程专硕求调剂 +10 慕寒mio 2026-03-16 10/500 2026-03-19 15:26 by 丁丁*
[考研] 266求调剂 +5 阳阳哇塞 2026-03-14 10/500 2026-03-19 15:08 by 阳阳哇塞
[考研] 0703化学336分求调剂 +6 zbzihdhd 2026-03-15 7/350 2026-03-18 09:53 by zhukairuo
[考研] 293求调剂 +11 zjl的号 2026-03-16 16/800 2026-03-18 08:10 by zhukairuo
[考研] 304求调剂 +5 素年祭语 2026-03-15 5/250 2026-03-16 17:00 by 我的船我的海
信息提示
请填处理意见