| 查看: 4679 | 回复: 41 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
Reject & Resubmit ,该怎么办呢
|
|||
|
不知道主编的态度怎么样？我准备修改后，再投，不知道希望有多大 Your manuscript # APP-2014-08-2861 entitled "Property reinforcement of ABS by simultaneous incorporation of copper particles and multiwalled carbon nanotubes" which you submitted to the Journal of Applied Polymer Science, has been reviewed. While the referees find your work of some potential interest, they have raised concerns that are sufficiently important that they preclude publication of the work in the Journal of Applied Polymer Science, at least in its present form. Should further research work allow you to address exhaustively these criticisms we would be happy to look at a revised manuscript (unless something similar has by then been accepted at our journal or appeared elsewhere). The comments from reviewers are included at the bottom of this letter. Please note that resubmitting your manuscript does not guarantee eventual acceptance, and that your resubmission will be subject to re-review by the reviewers before a decision is rendered. If you choose to resubmit your manuscript, go to http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/app and login to your Author Center. Look for "Manuscripts with Decisions" and select "Create a Resubmission" located next to the manuscript number. Then, follow the steps for resubmitting your manuscript. If you decide to submit a revised manuscript, it is mandatory that you respond in detail to each of the comments made by the reviewer(s) in the space provided. Please ensure that your response is reflected in the main text and you should use this space to document the changes you make to the original manuscript. Please review the attached document listing the file requirements for your revision. IMPORTANT: We have your original files. When submitting (uploading) your revised manuscript, please delete the file(s) that you wish to replace and then upload the revised file(s). May I take this opportunity to thank you for considering our Journal for the publication of your work. We hope that you will consider resubmitting your manuscript to the Journal. With kind regards, Dr. Brian Knapp Executive Editor, Journal of Applied Polymer Science bsknapp@gmail.com, brian.knapp@promerus.com Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author: Reviewer: 1 Comments to the Author The manuscript, ‘property reinforcement of ABS by simultaneous incorporation of copper particles and multiwalled carbon nanotubes’ has numerous scientific and English errors, so it is not suitable to publish in Journal of Applied Polymer Science. The details of the errors it contains is listed below, 1. The title of the manuscripts does not reflect the contents of the manuscripts in a proper manner, in addition it is not suitable to use the short form like ABS instead of using its full as acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene, in the title. 2. In the first sentence of the abstract the word ‘detailedly’ has been used, this word does not have any proper meaning. 3. The sentence mentioned in Introduction, ‘Multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) are considered as a versatile conductive filler in the polymer composite industry compared with Cu due to its large aspect ratio, good intrinsic electrical conductivity and excellent chemical properties’ need citation of suitable reference or references. 4. It is stated that, ‘CuCl nanorods are successfully prepared because of the presence of nonionic surfactant polypropylene glycol (PPG-400), which have length up to about 100 nm with diameters ranging from 20 to 50 nm’ practically any rod shaped particles are visible in both TEM and SEM images. 5. The word Cu powder has been used many times, while Cu particle is a suitable word instead of Cu powders. Overall, the representation or English of the manuscript is poor, so the manuscript requires rewriting in a proper way. Reviewer: 2 The authors report the synergistic effect of Cu and MWCNTs in decreasing the electrical resistivity of the Cu/MWCNT/ABS. The results are interesting; however, some details should be clarified: 1. MWNTs tend to agglomerated. In the experimental part, the authors should specify how to prepare the Cu/MWNT/ABS and MWNT/ABS composites. 2. Page 9, from Fig.5, we cannot see the nanotubes homogeneously dispersed in the matrix without agglomerates. The authors should offer further SEM or TEM micrographs to support this conclusion. 3. There is no scale or legend in Figure2. The figure caption for figure2 is ambiguous. We don’t known which is TEM or FESEM. 4. Figure8 is ambiguous. The authors can use different colour line for different samples. 5. There are some spelling or grammar mistakes in the text. For example, resistivity (line 17, page 9), reference (line 1, page 12). In table 1, it should be TGA, not TG. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
基金系统什么内容也没有
已经有6人回复
-
有多少人是今天查系统知道结果的？
已经有17人回复
-
国自然面上复盘~欢迎讨论
已经有12人回复
-
为什么资助数各大高校都创新高，自己申请怎么就这么难
已经有9人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有3人回复
-
哪位高人中了，把查询到的截图贴出来让我看看，让我长长见识
已经有6人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
-
面上合作单位盖章
已经有5人回复
-
导师吐槽：我怎么摊上了这么个极品研究生！
已经有7人回复
-
申请删除本帖
已经有7人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- reject & resubmit
已经有42人回复
- 投稿IET RSN被Reject with resubmit，顺便请各位虫友帮忙看看这个审稿意见
已经有5人回复
- 求助reject还是resubmit
已经有18人回复
- GRSL从Major Revision到Reject and Resubmit，悲剧！
已经有5人回复
- Taylor & Francis 的 Reject & Resubmit，请大家看看怎么办
已经有17人回复
- reject and resubmit
已经有12人回复
- Reject and Resubmit 接收率？
已经有13人回复
- 关于reject and resubmit 的问题
已经有14人回复
- 被reject后 再resubmit 严格按着审稿人的意见修改的 会有多大几率接收呢
已经有7人回复
- MMOR reject and resubmit
已经有15人回复
- reject and resubmit
已经有13人回复
- Reject & Resubmit
已经有18人回复
- 求助 Reject and Resubmit
已经有6人回复
- 审稿4个月，投稿系统显示Reject & Resubmit
已经有17人回复
- 关于Reject and Resubmit？？？？？？
已经有12人回复
- reject and resubmit
已经有8人回复
19楼2014-10-13 09:27:43
