版块导航: 正在加载中...

登录注册

应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

wanggenlin

铁杆木虫 (正式写手)

应助: 24 (小学生)
金币: 5081.5
帖子: 609
在线: 191小时
虫号: 557646

[交流] Reject & Resubmit ,该怎么办呢

不知道主编的态度怎么样？我准备修改后，再投，不知道希望有多大

Your manuscript # APP-2014-08-2861 entitled "Property reinforcement of ABS by simultaneous incorporation of copper particles and multiwalled carbon nanotubes" which you submitted to the Journal of Applied Polymer Science, has been reviewed. While the referees find your work of some potential interest, they have raised concerns that are sufficiently important that they preclude publication of the work in the Journal of Applied Polymer Science, at least in its present form.

Should further research work allow you to address exhaustively these criticisms we would be happy to look at a revised manuscript (unless something similar has by then been accepted at our journal or appeared elsewhere).

The comments from reviewers are included at the bottom of this letter.

Please note that resubmitting your manuscript does not guarantee eventual acceptance, and that your resubmission will be subject to re-review by the reviewers before a decision is rendered.

If you choose to resubmit your manuscript, go to http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/app and login to your Author Center. Look for "Manuscripts with Decisions" and select "Create a Resubmission" located next to the manuscript number. Then, follow the steps for resubmitting your manuscript.

If you decide to submit a revised manuscript, it is mandatory that you respond in detail to each of the comments made by the reviewer(s) in the space provided. Please ensure that your response is reflected in the main text and you should use this space to document the changes you make to the original manuscript. Please review the attached document listing the file requirements for your revision.

IMPORTANT: We have your original files. When submitting (uploading) your revised manuscript, please delete the file(s) that you wish to replace and then upload the revised file(s).

May I take this opportunity to thank you for considering our Journal for the publication of your work. We hope that you will consider resubmitting your manuscript to the Journal.

With kind regards,

Dr. Brian Knapp
Executive Editor, Journal of Applied Polymer Science
bsknapp@gmail.com, brian.knapp@promerus.com

Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author:

Reviewer: 1

Comments to the Author
The manuscript, ‘property reinforcement of ABS by simultaneous incorporation of copper particles and multiwalled carbon nanotubes’ has numerous scientific and English errors, so it is not suitable to publish in Journal of Applied Polymer Science. The details of the errors it contains is listed below,
1. The title of the manuscripts does not reflect the contents of the manuscripts in a proper manner, in addition it is not suitable to use the short form like ABS instead of using its full as acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene, in the title.
2. In the first sentence of the abstract the word ‘detailedly’ has been used, this word does not have any proper meaning.
3. The sentence mentioned in Introduction, ‘Multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) are considered as a versatile conductive filler in the polymer composite industry compared with Cu due to its large aspect ratio, good intrinsic electrical conductivity and excellent chemical properties’ need citation of suitable reference or references.
4. It is stated that, ‘CuCl nanorods are successfully prepared because of the presence of nonionic surfactant polypropylene glycol (PPG-400), which have length up to about 100 nm with diameters ranging from 20 to 50 nm’ practically any rod shaped particles are visible in both TEM and SEM images.
5. The word Cu powder has been used many times, while Cu particle is a suitable word instead of Cu powders. Overall, the representation or English of the manuscript is poor, so the manuscript requires rewriting in a proper way.

Reviewer: 2

The authors report the synergistic effect of Cu and MWCNTs in decreasing the electrical resistivity of the Cu/MWCNT/ABS. The results are interesting; however, some details should be clarified:

1. MWNTs tend to agglomerated. In the experimental part, the authors should specify how to prepare the Cu/MWNT/ABS and MWNT/ABS composites.

2. Page 9, from Fig.5, we cannot see the nanotubes homogeneously dispersed in the matrix without agglomerates. The authors should offer further SEM or TEM micrographs to support this conclusion.

3. There is no scale or legend in Figure2. The figure caption for figure2 is ambiguous. We don’t known which is TEM or FESEM.

4. Figure8 is ambiguous. The authors can use different colour line for different samples.

5. There are some spelling or grammar mistakes in the text. For example, resistivity (line 17, page 9), reference (line 1, page 12). In table 1, it should be TGA, not TG.

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

336求调剂已经有5人回复
277材料科学与工程080500求调剂已经有6人回复
333求调剂已经有4人回复
286求调剂已经有8人回复
298求调剂已经有4人回复
306求0703调剂一志愿华中师范已经有5人回复
299求调剂已经有7人回复
26考研一志愿中国石油大学(华东)305分求调剂已经有6人回复
初试 317 已经有5人回复
296求调剂已经有3人回复

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:

reject & resubmit 已经有42人回复
投稿IET RSN被Reject with resubmit，顺便请各位虫友帮忙看看这个审稿意见已经有5人回复
求助reject还是resubmit 已经有18人回复
GRSL从Major Revision到Reject and Resubmit，悲剧！已经有5人回复
Taylor & Francis 的 Reject & Resubmit，请大家看看怎么办已经有17人回复
reject and resubmit 已经有12人回复
Reject and Resubmit 接收率？已经有13人回复
关于reject and resubmit 的问题已经有14人回复
被reject后再resubmit 严格按着审稿人的意见修改的会有多大几率接收呢已经有7人回复
MMOR reject and resubmit 已经有15人回复
reject and resubmit 已经有13人回复
Reject & Resubmit 已经有18人回复
求助 Reject and Resubmit 已经有6人回复
审稿4个月，投稿系统显示Reject & Resubmit 已经有17人回复
关于Reject and Resubmit？？？？？？已经有12人回复
reject and resubmit 已经有8人回复

» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

1楼 2014-10-13 08:50:20

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

jjfengnju

金虫 (正式写手)

应助: 6 (幼儿园)
金币: 3535.3
帖子: 994
在线: 1827.7小时
虫号: 683572

会返给原来的审稿人的二审

赞一下