|
|
[求助]
KSCE杂志，二审回来，没有找到reviewer #1的审稿意见，该怎么办？ 已有3人参与
这是二审回来reviewer #1的审稿意见：
Reviewer #1: Dear Authors,
Greatly appreciate the efforts to revise the paper.
However, there are still some comments remain to be clarified and revised. Therefore, I should recommend to revise.
Comments are uploaded and hope you could find it in the system as this text window does not support colors of text, which is quite helpful to easily identify reviewer's second comments to author's response written in red.
Thanks and warm regards,
Reviewer
我在系统里面找了很久都没有见到审稿专家1的意见，我打算向主编询问下，大家觉得可以么？
在线等，希望各位能够提供什么建设性建议！谢谢！ |
» 猜你喜欢
售SCI-T0P文章，我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.5.4,科目全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI-T0P文章，我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有4人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
|
回复此楼
20+3