24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2303  |  回复: 14
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

Yafong

新虫 (初入文坛)

[交流] 大家帮我看看审稿人的意见,看录用的概率大么 已有5人参与

Reviewer Comments:
Reviewer #1 Evaluations:
Recommendation: Publish after minor revision
Technically sound: Y
New ideas: N
Just a variation of known device or technique: Y
Appropriate journal: Y
Proper context with related work: Y
Clear explanation: Y
Adequate references: Y
Suitable title: Y
Adequate abstract: Y
Significant numerical quantities: Y
Clear figures with captions: Y
Excessive text or figures: N
English satisfactory: Y
Regular Article vs Note: Regular Article

Reviewer #1 (Remarks):

The authors carry a good engineering practice to design a high voltage divider with fast response time. The design comes through a completed theoretical calculation and modeling to the real "product". However, the resistive divider is a well known technology, and the equipment introduced in this paper hasn't distinguished itself from the conventional voltage divider. I suggest the authors to revise the paper and emphasis the new ideas, inventions or discoveries.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

yl150414

禁言 (小有名气)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
本帖内容被屏蔽

8楼2014-09-25 15:29:28
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 Yafong 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见