24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

qdwl

金虫 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 1106.9
散金: 62
红花: 2
帖子: 111
在线: 652.4小时
虫号: 192165
注册: 2006-02-21
性别: MM
专业: 分析化学/食品检测

[交流] 帮忙看看，怎么回事两个评审小修，编辑要大修。已有2人参与

投 Journal of Agricultrual and Food Chemistry
编辑：
Your manuscript was reviewed carefully by myself and referred to reviewers for comment. On the basis of this study, I have decided that the manuscript is not acceptable in its present form and requires major revision before it can be considered for publication. Reviewer comments appear at the end of this letter.

reviewer 1:
Recommendation: Publish after minor revisions.
....The topic of this manuscript is challenging scientific quest in food and agricultural chemistry. Results are excellently presented and elaborated. Therefore, I recommend to Editor, to consider this manuscript for publication in JAFC. Furthermore, my personal opinion is that this manuscript has a strong citation potency.

Additional Questions:
Originality: Excellent
Technical Quality: Excellent
Clarity of Presentation: Excellent
Importance to Field: Good

Reviewer: 2

Recommendation: Publish after minor revisions.

Comments:
....
The studies were well carried out and presented in a reasonable clarity. I would like to recommend this one for a publication having these minor concerns addressed adequately.
1. Throughout the manuscript, the english is not good. Some of the sentences need to be reconstructed. In its current situation, the grammer and sentence contruction is unacceptable.
2. There are lots of minor typographical mistakes that need to be addressed properly.
Additional Questions:
Originality: Good

Technical Quality: Good

Clarity of Presentation: Good

Importance to Field: Excellent

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

假如你的研究生提出不合理要求已经有6人回复
对氯苯硼酸纯化已经有3人回复
求助:我三月中下旬出站，青基依托单位怎么办？已经有12人回复
不自信的我已经有12人回复
所感已经有4人回复
论文终于录用啦！满足毕业条件了已经有28人回复
要不要辞职读博？已经有7人回复
北核录用已经有3人回复
实验室接单子已经有3人回复
磺酰氟产物，毕不了业了！已经有8人回复

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:

修改意见是小修还是大修？已经又返回去外审了，不懂！求教！已经有9人回复
Revise-大修还是小修？第二个审稿人什么意思？已经有27人回复
大修后变小修，俩问题，但比较棘手已经有131人回复
请大家看一下我的评审意见，是小修，还是大修？已经有10人回复
投英国JMES先是大修，然后小修，最后居然是拒稿，求分析！！已经有10人回复
一天大修变小修，什么情况？已经有28人回复
小修变成了大修，会不会悲剧啊已经有23人回复
大修终于回来了，要小修，有一个审稿人难缠咋办呀已经有6人回复
SCI大修后编辑给出小修，请帮我看看谢谢已经有7人回复
论文修改第二次了，也没有写大修还是小修，都是revise，第二次修改都半个月还没消息已经有12人回复
J.Power sources 给了一个月的修改期限，算大修还是小修？已经有11人回复
一年后收到初审意见没标明大修还是小修已经有9人回复
紧急求助:Energy srouces 一次大修，一次小修后拒稿，能够给主编写信说明情况已经有20人回复
审稿意见：一个大修，两个小修已经有34人回复
不知道是大修还是小修，套词什么意思啊？修改稿会被如何处理？等待很折磨啊！已经有8人回复
我的第一SCI投稿返回意见了，这个算大修还是小修？ Physica A 已经有11人回复
大家帮我看看审稿人的意见是大修还是小修，接收概率多大已经有9人回复
请看下这个是大修还是小修已经有18人回复
一个说据，一个说小修，结果裁定为大修已经有28人回复
帮我看看啊:编辑是要大修还是小修？已经有15人回复
小修变大修，心情郁闷已经有40人回复
大修之后的小修，怎么办呢？已经有11人回复

1楼 2014-09-10 22:47:40

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

brucefan

专家顾问 (著名写手)

专家经验: +218
应助: 422 (硕士)
金币: 2294.8
散金: 1720
红花: 88
帖子: 1423
在线: 670.2小时
虫号: 3048965
注册: 2014-03-14
性别: GG
专业: 凝聚态物性 II ：电子结构
管辖: 分子模拟

★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖

“Your manuscript was reviewed carefully by myself and referred to reviewers for comment. ”
这句说明编辑自己也仔细审了你的稿子。虽然其他审稿人给了小修，编辑最后给了大修。
presentation和citation都要改进。

赞一下

回复此楼

2楼2014-09-10 23:52:44

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

qdwl

金虫 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 1106.9
散金: 62
红花: 2
帖子: 111
在线: 652.4小时
虫号: 192165
注册: 2006-02-21
性别: MM
专业: 分析化学/食品检测

引用回帖:

2楼: Originally posted by brucefan at 2014-09-10 23:52:44
“Your manuscript was reviewed carefully by myself and referred to reviewers for comment. ”
这句说明编辑自己也仔细审了你的稿子。虽然其他审稿人给了小修，编辑最后给了大修。
presentation和citation都要 ...

能再具体点吗？

回复此楼

3楼2014-09-11 11:03:26

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖