24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 842  |  回复: 3
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

lovemuli

金虫 (正式写手)

[求助] 有关纳米毒性的论文投稿,遇到审稿人的模糊评审意见,请达人帮忙解答? 已有1人参与

如图,下面是审稿人的意见:
For the functional groups [XPS images show GO including 59.99% C1s, 36.57% O1s and 3.44% N1s. C1s was a composite of C-C (46.79%), C-H (42.59%) and C-O-C (10.62%). O1s was a composite of C=O (75.24%) and O=C-O (24.76%). N1s comprised N-C (88.20%) and N=C (11.80%). These oxygen- and nitrogen-containing groups produced the hydrophilic surface of GO. ], on the other hand, also need to be examined in a very careful manner. Intensity of interactions with cells, behaviors involved in the interactions with cells, mechanism of ORS induction, and the possible reactions for causing metabolic disturbances, all these key points have to be specified in a biochemical manner.

中括号中加重的部分是审稿人复制我的论文内容,请问怎么回复审稿人的评审意见。“also need to be examined in a very careful manner”,怎么去修改论文?
“be specified in a biochemical manner”, 生化的方式是什么?
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

lovemuli

金虫 (正式写手)

补充,上面的“ORS”应该是“ROS”。
2楼2014-08-06 23:31:09
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

lovemuli

金虫 (正式写手)

继续求达人解疑
4楼2014-08-07 11:49:51
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 lovemuli 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见