24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 3111  |  回复: 23
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

andyzhu

木虫 (正式写手)

[交流] 被这样的审稿意见拒搞了。

虽然我知道有自己疏忽的问题,但是相对于第二个审稿人(提出更多实质意义的的建议)让我大修,我还是有点郁闷。哎,运气不好,还是我没意识到这些问题有多严重,请高手指点迷津。如下。

1. The .cif files do not contain the shelx instructions or the reflection intensities. The .fcf file has also not been provided by the authors. As such, the refinement cannot be independently verified by the reviewer. 没上传fcf,是最大的罪过。

2. The text mentions the MOF space group is Pcca, however it is listed as Pccn in the .cif files. 我的错,眼神不好,写错。

3. Page 10, line 208: “Moreover, the presence of trace (CH2)2NH2+ ions used as the counter cations…” Trace ions?!? Isn’t the dimethyl ammonium the counter ion for the structure? I would expect it to be present in stoichiometric proportions, not trace amounts…自己表达不清。

4. The authors claim that the (CH2)2NH2+ ion is the charge balancing cation in the MOF structures, however, the authors present no evidence to support this claim. Given that the authors claim that the cation influences the physical properties of the material (Page 10 line 208), the chemical identity of the cation should be established unambiguously.给我个机会,我可证明,的确  (CH2)2NH2+真实存在。。

5. Several notable entries in the crystal data table (S1) are absent: number of parameters, number of restraints, cell volume, 2-theta range, Rint, hkl limits.我可以补的,但是我的表格就是抄的这个杂志之前table。。

6. None of the datablock names in the .cif files or cifchecks matches the names in the manuscript. This unnecessarily complicates reviewer evaluations.难道我的cif命名为我的CCDC号也是一种错误?不解。。

7. The Eu structure contains 12 restraints. No details are given. 之前投稿没注意这个要。以后大家要注意了,特别是晶体学杂志

8. The H2DDQ structure: H1 does not appear to be in a correctly refined position. Likewise, the protons on the water molecule have not been refined. It seems that they should be added such that they form hydrogen bonds with N2 and O2.

9. Both the Eu and Er structures contain very large residual electron density peaks. The location of the peaks should be mentioned and explained.稀土金属容易出现鬼峰,我就少说了一句。

10. While MOF datasets are often of poor quality and low resolution/completeness, this should not be the case for well-packed small molecules. Though the completeness is reasonable at 0.977, why is this not closer to 1.0? Was the data collected properly? Was there a problem with the data processing? 完整度0.977在我们学校测试可以了,曝光时间3S, 三斜扫一般700张

11. For all structures, the formulas should be updated to reflect the refined data. Atoms which are not present (for example, Cl and P in the H2DDQ structure) should be removed. 因为体系有这个元素,解的时候定了P Cl了,但是这不至于拒搞吧。
回复此楼
已阅   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

邴绍所

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

★ ★ ★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
andyzhu: 金币+2 2014-07-06 15:33:02
真心的祝福你,
真心的祝福你。
12楼2014-07-06 11:12:53
已阅   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 24 个回答

andyzhu

木虫 (正式写手)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by wwyy123 at 2014-07-06 09:17:36

3楼2014-07-06 09:29:11
已阅   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

supervb

铁杆木虫 (文坛精英)

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
andyzhu: 金币+5, 我投的是二区的,应该都会先技术审查吧,不过我觉得你说的对,多从自身找问题吧, 2014-07-06 09:42:29
楼主稿子里估计跟该杂志要求相悖的东西太多了(尤其是技术格式和文件上传要求等等),被审稿人这么一罗列出来,编辑一看肯定拒稿啊!其实这种情况换到任何杂志(国内的不算、收费水货不算)都要被拒稿的,因为不符合论文上传要求了,如果技术审查在前的话,都不用送审就直接拒了。
这不是运气不好,这是犯错太多!打铁还需自身硬啊!
咱是做非线性随机动力学的哟
4楼2014-07-06 09:35:17
已阅   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

b040426

新虫 (知名作家)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
反反复复的翻唱 v 宝贝你看 ii
5楼2014-07-06 10:01:19
已阅   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
信息提示
请填处理意见