24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 679  |  回复: 2
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

sm1222

铜虫 (小有名气)

[求助] SCI返回大修,问题咨询~~求过来人指点

返回的意见之一是:
One of the major flaws of this paper is it lacks experimental results and simulations. As there is neither any real implementation, it is hard to approve the validity of the proposed approach and a simple comparison is not enough to convince readers. I would suggest the authors to design some experiments and show evidences that can establish the validity of their approach.

意思应该是补实验,目前针对这个论文只设计和实现了原型系统,如果针对这个问题,写一下系统设计的模块并给出实现的截图可不可以呢?还是需要更细致的哪些方面呢?因为第一次处理这种大修的结论,十分紧张有什么写的不周全的地方。

另一个意见是:
The problem is interesting and the solution is easy to understand. However, the technical contribution seems to me to be trivial. It adopts a simple encryption method for each objects in a document to achieve the fine-grained access control. Thus it will introduce a heavy key management and computation overhead. This paper should consider the new issue.

Some suggests:
(1)It is not necessary to spend so much paragraphs to describe the common application scenarios.
(2)The paper should adopts new technology to manage the keys, such as key derivation functions or key hierarchy.

第一个是应用场景要压缩,这个应该还可以,但是第二个密钥的问题不是我论文的论述重点,可不可以给审稿人再回复里面解释一下呢?没有这个经验,如果解释了会不会有什么问题?

另外就是The topic of this manuscript does not fall within the scope of the Communications subject area,但是投稿是针对期刊的一个专栏,包含了我的论文方向,不知道这个需不需要解释一下呢?

谢谢各位了~~~钱不多,等有钱了一定重谢
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

sm1222

铜虫 (小有名气)

没人回……难道我得问题有问题……
3楼2014-06-04 00:31:32
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 3 个回答

sm1222

铜虫 (小有名气)

没人回自己顶一个吧……囧
2楼2014-06-03 16:04:00
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
信息提示
请填处理意见