| 查看: 3113 | 回复: 4 | ||
辛超金虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
论文的状态是Revise-mandatory，有经验的虫子帮看看意见! 已有2人参与
|
|
向MSE-A投了篇文章，大概10天左右就一审完成了。 然后状态是Revise-mandatory，第一次发论文，心里没什么底! 但看了审稿人的意见，还是觉得还是有戏的，望有经验的虫子们指点啊。 以下是编辑回复和审稿人的意见： Dear **, Your manuscript, "**", is being returned to you with a mandatory revision recommendation. It will be considered for publication in MSE A provided that it is revised in accord with any below comments of the reviewer or any additional comments and or corrections in the "Reviewer Attachments". If you choose to revise your manuscript it will be due into the Editorial Office by the Jun 29, 2014. Please note that this is a strict deadline. Any papers outstanding in the system after this deadline has expired will be withdrawn unless you have contacted the Editorial Office regarding your revised manuscript. Please submit your revised paper files as well as the "Detailed Responses to the reviewer comments" file, which incorporates all the reviewer comments and your detailed responses to such, at: http://ees.elsevier.com/msea/ Your username is: ****** If you need to retrieve password details, please go to: http://ees.elsevier.com/msea/automail_query.asp NOTE: Upon submitting your revised manuscript, please upload the source files for your article. For additional details regarding acceptable file formats, please refer to the Guide for Authors at: http://www.elsevier.com/journals ... 3/guide-for-authors When submitting your revised paper, we ask that you include the following items: Response to Reviewers (mandatory) This should be a separate file labeled "Response to Reviewers" that carefully addresses, point-by-point, the issues raised in the comments appended below. You should also include a suitable rebuttal to any specific request for change that you have not made. Mention the page, paragraph, and line number of any revisions that are made. Manuscript and Figure Source Files (mandatory) We cannot accommodate PDF manuscript files for production purposes. We also ask that when submitting your revision you follow the journal formatting guidelines. Figures and tables may be embedded within the source file for the submission as long as they are of sufficient resolution for Production. Refer to the Guide for Authors for additional information. http://www.elsevier.com/journals ... 3/guide-for-authors When submitting your revised paper, please ensure that the item uploaded as "manuscript" is a clean file which incorporates all the revisions/changes and this should be the final version of the main manuscript text. Please do not include the previous (old) version of your manuscript. Please ensure that the item uploaded as the "marked up manuscript" is the revised file which contains all the revisions/changes made in highlighted font so that one can easily view the revisions/changes made to your revision. Click on [Author Login] On your Main Menu page is a folder entitled "Submissions Needing Revision". You will find your submission record there. Click on 'View Reviewer Attachments' (if present) to access any files uploaded by the reviewers. Kindly use the above manuscript reference number with all correspondence concerning this paper. Please note that this journal offers a new, free service called AudioSlides: brief, webcast-style presentations that are shown next to published articles on ScienceDirect (see also http://www.elsevier.com/audioslides). If your paper is accepted for publication, you will automatically receive an invitation to create an AudioSlides presentation. Yours sincerely, E.J. Lavernia Editor Materials Science & Engineering A Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: 1. In page 4 line 24 you write "the eutectic phases have a bad bonding with <alpha>-Mg matrix". What do you mean by "bad bonding". 2. In Fig. 3. (b) Excuse me but I cannot see the interface and eutectic phase near the white arrows. 3. Please give details of cooling mod after solid - solution treatment (Fig.1. (b)). This information is not presented in the experimental procedures. 4. In Page 5 line 9 you write "the eutectic phases near the original grain boundaries are dissolved". What do you mean by "original grain boundaries". |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
293求调剂
已经有12人回复
-
070300化学319求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
268求调剂
已经有9人回复
-
301求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
0703化学336分求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
301求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
材料专硕306英一数二
已经有9人回复
-
304求调剂
已经有8人回复
-
材料工程专硕调剂
已经有5人回复
-
344求调剂
已经有4人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 救命啊！！！关于Revised version review，投过稿的虫子，进来看看发生了什么吧
已经有7人回复
- 有今年投过applied enenrgy的虫子么？进来一叙
已经有17人回复
- 《电子学报》是“编委审批”状态，虫子们知道是啥意思吗？
已经有37人回复
- food chemistry投稿全过程，有打算投这个期刊需要帮助的虫子可以来交流一下。。。
已经有18人回复
- 求有经验的虫子，要Scientific Reports发表的在线期刊论文如何写入？
已经有6人回复
- 请问有投WCNC2014的虫子吗？
已经有5人回复
- 有投稿过欧洲化学的虫子进来看看
已经有5人回复
- 有Habitat International 投稿经验的虫子吗？毕业急，请指教。
已经有14人回复
- 有没有虫子投过计算机学报？看看计算机学报给我的审稿意见，我还有必要修改吗？
已经有12人回复
- Water Research第二篇又是大修，求有经验虫子解惑。
已经有7人回复
- 论文的状态是Revise-mandatory，有经验的虫子帮看看意见哈！
已经有19人回复
- 有人投过Chemical Science吗，有经验的虫子交流一下。
已经有12人回复
- 有经验的虫子，帮忙看看，数据重复性、精确度的问题。
已经有5人回复
- chemcomm大修，第一次投文章，一些问题不知道怎么回答，虫子们帮帮忙啊！
已经有17人回复
- 悬赏！！！有投过《Computers, Materials, & Continua》的虫子们看过来！
已经有27人回复
- Major revise 和 mandatory revise 那个更严重点？
已经有4人回复
- 请教Applied optics的Manuscript Accepted with Mandatory Revisions是个什么状态？
已经有15人回复
- 文章状态是Revise - mandatory
已经有10人回复
- Virology Journal 投稿5个月了，今天终于接收了，谢谢回帖的各位虫子
已经有35人回复
- a mandatory revision recommendation
已经有7人回复
- 虫子们给我介绍几个容易上的SCI有机杂志吧
已经有22人回复
- 英文水平不过关，各位虫子的文章都是找什么人改的？
已经有22人回复
- 有经验的虫子说说编委专家审定是什么意思？
已经有11人回复
- mandatory revision recommendation
已经有3人回复
- 大修后文章直接录用，谈点经验与虫子们共勉
已经有671人回复
razy_hoper
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 96 (初中生)
- 金币: 810.1
- 散金: 316
- 红花: 5
- 帖子: 351
- 在线: 60.1小时
- 虫号: 2495964
- 注册: 2013-06-04
- 专业: 信息安全
2楼2014-05-08 00:31:56
sdcavell
铁杆木虫 (职业作家)
- 应助: 95 (初中生)
- 金币: 9470.2
- 散金: 1717
- 红花: 14
- 沙发: 1
- 帖子: 3965
- 在线: 506.6小时
- 虫号: 2203061
- 注册: 2012-12-24
- 专业: 模式识别
3楼2014-05-08 07:34:03
辛超
金虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 5 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 904.7
- 散金: 286
- 帖子: 234
- 在线: 210.6小时
- 虫号: 1196955
- 注册: 2011-01-27
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 金属材料的微观结构
4楼2014-05-09 08:24:46
辛超
金虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 5 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 904.7
- 散金: 286
- 帖子: 234
- 在线: 210.6小时
- 虫号: 1196955
- 注册: 2011-01-27
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 金属材料的微观结构
5楼2014-05-09 08:25:35
