应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 学术交流区 » 论文投稿 » 投稿求助 » 论文初审意见回来，但没有看懂是什么意思，请大家帮忙指点个下，谢谢！
南方科技大学公共卫生及应急管理学院2026级博士研究生招生报考通知（长期有效）
91/1返回列表
查看: 2046  |  回复: 8
只看楼主@他人 存档 新回复提醒 (忽略) 收藏    在APP中查看

LuPeng5366

新虫 (著名写手)

牛牛

[求助] 论文初审意见回来，但没有看懂是什么意思，请大家帮忙指点个下，谢谢！已有6人参与

论文初审意见回来，但没有看懂是什么意思，不知道该怎么处理，请大家帮忙指点个下，谢谢！
Reviewer #1:
In the submitted manuscript the authors report a systematic  study about the structures, stabilities
and electronic properties of several small pure and binary clusters composed by Ag and Cr.


The strategy followed, with respect to properties and indices of stability etc
is well established the last decade by numerous studies devoted in small and medium sized clusters.
The presentation of the obtained results is clear and helps the reader to follow the reported results.

*Everything would be fine if the clusters considered were of trivial electronic structure*

The systems chosen are very hard to treat cases.
Some of those bear electronic structures which cannot be treated by a monodeterminal method.

Especially the smallest members of this work (dimers and trimmers) are notorious in the community about their ease of treating.

For instance Cr2 is a very well known case of a dimer bearing large multi- referential character accounting to 47% of the total wave function.

I performed personally the T1 diagnostic as implemented in G09 (the same goes for g03) using the same geometry and basis set used in the submitted study and I found that the respective quantity is more than 2 times larger than the proposed limit of (0.02)

The same goes for some of the three-atomic systems presented.


Maybe the authors are aware of this essential problem since as it is clarified in the text
this study focuses more on the obtained trends than in presenting values that could be compared to the literature.

*However, it is also true that reliable trends can be only obtained from reliable methods*.

For this reason I cannot propose this paper to be accepted in its current form, even if the trends revealed might prove similar to those obtained from
more suitable methods.

In a future attempt on such systems the authors should check the  multi-referential character of each cluster plus the stability of each the wavefuctions used.
Some of the larger clusters considered may not suffer from the effects described above, thus, the obtained results might prove reliable.

There is additional documentation related to this decision letter. To access the file(s), please click the link below. You may also login to the system and click the 'View Attachments' link in the Action column.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
自信，坚强，勇敢。
1楼2014-04-18 17:30:21
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

sigma

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与，应助指数 +1
太专业了，就看懂了据稿那句话。反正就是因为一些原因据了你的稿，如果修改建议怎样怎样。
编辑是给你大修还是据了？

[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
赞一下 回复此楼
2楼2014-04-18 17:38:20
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

亚楠

至尊木虫 (知名作家)

追逐幸福的人

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与，应助指数 +1
应该是对现在的文章结果不是很满意，需要修改，将审稿人的问题仔细就出来回答就行了，好像是需要其他的方式进一步证明文章的一些结论，祝好运！

[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
赞一下 回复此楼
我的人生注定了有你陪伴，我们的生活会越来越美好，加油！
3楼2014-04-18 19:04:47
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

frank110119

禁虫 (职业作家)
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ...
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
LuPeng5366: 金币+100, ★有帮助, 5 2014-04-19 12:25:41
本帖内容被屏蔽
4楼2014-04-18 19:39:57
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

绍敏郡主

木虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与，应助指数 +1
看起来主要是让你考虑多参考态特性
赞一下 回复此楼
5楼2014-04-18 19:45:58
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

peterflyer

木虫之王 (文学泰斗)

peterflyer

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与，应助指数 +1
1、审稿人认为楼主的表征，存在问题，不可靠；
Some of those bear electronic structures which cannot be treated by a monodeterminal method.
2、有些数据不可靠
I performed personally the T1 diagnostic as implemented in G09 (the same goes for g03) using the same geometry and basis set used in the submitted study and I found that the respective quantity is more than 2 times larger than the proposed limit of (0.02)。
3、楼主需要进一步做的工作（做了也不保证接受）
In a future attempt on such systems the authors should check the  multi-referential character of each cluster plus the stability of each the wavefuctions used.
Some of the larger clusters considered may not suffer from the effects described above, thus, the obtained results might prove reliable.
4、最后还有另外的审稿意见在 decision letter里。打开相应的链接看看。
总体来讲，可以认为审稿人对楼主的工作基本持否定的态度，因此在此期刊发表的前景比较不乐观，建议先修改后再短时间内观察看看，不行立即他投。
赞一下 回复此楼
6楼2014-04-18 20:13:17
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

19920710lwq
赞

[ 发自小木虫客户端 ]
7楼2014-04-18 20:17:46
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

615780236

禁虫 (知名作家)
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
本帖内容被屏蔽
8楼2014-04-18 22:02:59
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

LuPeng5366

新虫 (著名写手)

牛牛
引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by sigma at 2014-04-18 17:38:20
太专业了，就看懂了据稿那句话。反正就是因为一些原因据了你的稿，如果修改建议怎样怎样。
编辑是给你大修还是据了？

大修
回复此楼
自信，坚强，勇敢。
9楼2014-04-19 12:21:48
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 LuPeng5366 的主题更新
91/1返回列表
普通表情 龙 兔 虎 猫
信息提示
关闭
请填处理意见
关闭