| 查看: 2643 | 回复: 8 | ||
LuPeng5366新虫 (著名写手)
牛牛
|
[求助]
论文初审意见回来，但没有看懂是什么意思，请大家帮忙指点个下，谢谢！ 已有6人参与
|
|
论文初审意见回来，但没有看懂是什么意思，不知道该怎么处理，请大家帮忙指点个下，谢谢！ Reviewer #1: In the submitted manuscript the authors report a systematic study about the structures, stabilities and electronic properties of several small pure and binary clusters composed by Ag and Cr. The strategy followed, with respect to properties and indices of stability etc is well established the last decade by numerous studies devoted in small and medium sized clusters. The presentation of the obtained results is clear and helps the reader to follow the reported results. *Everything would be fine if the clusters considered were of trivial electronic structure* The systems chosen are very hard to treat cases. Some of those bear electronic structures which cannot be treated by a monodeterminal method. Especially the smallest members of this work (dimers and trimmers) are notorious in the community about their ease of treating. For instance Cr2 is a very well known case of a dimer bearing large multi- referential character accounting to 47% of the total wave function. I performed personally the T1 diagnostic as implemented in G09 (the same goes for g03) using the same geometry and basis set used in the submitted study and I found that the respective quantity is more than 2 times larger than the proposed limit of (0.02) The same goes for some of the three-atomic systems presented. Maybe the authors are aware of this essential problem since as it is clarified in the text this study focuses more on the obtained trends than in presenting values that could be compared to the literature. *However, it is also true that reliable trends can be only obtained from reliable methods*. For this reason I cannot propose this paper to be accepted in its current form, even if the trends revealed might prove similar to those obtained from more suitable methods. In a future attempt on such systems the authors should check the multi-referential character of each cluster plus the stability of each the wavefuctions used. Some of the larger clusters considered may not suffer from the effects described above, thus, the obtained results might prove reliable. There is additional documentation related to this decision letter. To access the file(s), please click the link below. You may also login to the system and click the 'View Attachments' link in the Action column. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
明天应该可查了！？
已经有5人回复
-
如果此刻你正在为国基感到焦虑，不妨来听听这首《基金之外》
已经有7人回复
-
没有任何消息-是不是就凉了
已经有8人回复
-
售SCI-T0P文章，我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.551.O.5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有5人回复
-
人气不行了
已经有10人回复
-
我面上完蛋了
已经有10人回复
-
能否退出参与的面上项目解除限项
已经有24人回复
-
filecode，4个jtjc了
已经有17人回复
-
2026国自然函评费到账
已经有19人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 大家帮忙看下一个审稿意见
已经有12人回复
- 论文投稿返回的审稿意见，这两条确切意思是什么，高手帮我翻译下！谢谢
已经有3人回复
- 二审审稿意见怎么回复？谢谢大家，帮忙看看吧，给点意见
已经有3人回复
- 大家帮忙看看，SCI校稿时编辑发过来的这段话的意思
已经有9人回复
- 请诸位小木虫的高手帮忙鉴定一下这封编辑回信是什么意思，有修改后接受的意思吗
已经有13人回复
- 导师让我看他学生的论文，是什么意思
已经有37人回复
- 看不懂编辑给的论文修改意见，请大家帮忙呀，谢谢大家了
已经有9人回复
- 投稿后修改意见回来，但有一条没看明白，请高手指教
已经有13人回复
- 文章已收，大家帮忙看看编辑部返回的修改意见？
已经有14人回复
- 大神帮我看看这个审稿意见是什么意思？
已经有8人回复
- 大家请帮我看看这个审稿意见是什么意思？
已经有7人回复
- 大家帮我看下，专家审稿意见里面有这么一句，是什么意思哦？
已经有21人回复
- 编辑初审给出这样的意见，大家帮看看是什么意思？
已经有17人回复
- 电力自动化设备审稿回来，但不给看意见什么情况呀
已经有7人回复
- 表格的格式,帮忙看看是什么意思啊?
已经有5人回复
- 评审人回复的意见，请大家帮忙看下这个要怎么改？
已经有3人回复
- 初审的审稿意见是什么意思
已经有19人回复
- 审稿要给意见，没看懂这个选项decline W/O review 是啥意思
已经有5人回复
- 请帮我看看编辑是什么意思
已经有15人回复
- 论文修回后编辑给出如下意见，有些看不懂什么意思，指高人指点
已经有25人回复
- 求解投稿（振动与冲击）的邮件回复，大家帮我看这个是啥意思，谢谢。
已经有8人回复
- elsevier的编辑对论文提出修改意见，没看懂，请大家帮忙看看
已经有6人回复
- 投稿两天，编辑来信要求，第一个要求没怎么看懂。请教这是什么意思？
已经有17人回复
- 关于Chinese Physic B 初审意见，帮忙看看
已经有15人回复
sigma
铁杆木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 694 (博士)
- 金币: 5538.8
- 散金: 50
- 红花: 43
- 帖子: 2154
- 在线: 208.3小时
- 虫号: 165203
- 注册: 2006-01-12
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 光学
2楼2014-04-18 17:38:20
亚楠
至尊木虫 (知名作家)
追逐幸福的人
- 应助: 396 (硕士)
- 金币: 23821.4
- 散金: 60
- 红花: 29
- 帖子: 7645
- 在线: 934小时
- 虫号: 593663
- 注册: 2008-09-05
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 凝聚态物性 II ：电子结构
3楼2014-04-18 19:04:47
frank110119
禁虫 (职业作家)
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ...
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
LuPeng5366: 金币+100, ★有帮助, 5 2014-04-19 12:25:41
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
LuPeng5366: 金币+100, ★有帮助, 5 2014-04-19 12:25:41
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
4楼2014-04-18 19:39:57
绍敏郡主
木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 289 (大学生)
- 金币: 1251.1
- 散金: 2196
- 红花: 41
- 帖子: 1575
- 在线: 1866.7小时
- 虫号: 2611526
- 注册: 2013-08-22
- 专业: 原子和分子物理
5楼2014-04-18 19:45:58
peterflyer 
木虫之王 (文学泰斗)
peterflyer
- 应助: 20282 (院士)
- 金币: 146690
- 红花: 1374
- 帖子: 93091
- 在线: 7695小时
- 虫号: 1482829
- 注册: 2011-11-08
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 功能陶瓷
【答案】应助回帖
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
|
1、审稿人认为楼主的表征，存在问题，不可靠； Some of those bear electronic structures which cannot be treated by a monodeterminal method. 2、有些数据不可靠 I performed personally the T1 diagnostic as implemented in G09 (the same goes for g03) using the same geometry and basis set used in the submitted study and I found that the respective quantity is more than 2 times larger than the proposed limit of (0.02)。 3、楼主需要进一步做的工作（做了也不保证接受） In a future attempt on such systems the authors should check the multi-referential character of each cluster plus the stability of each the wavefuctions used. Some of the larger clusters considered may not suffer from the effects described above, thus, the obtained results might prove reliable. 4、最后还有另外的审稿意见在 decision letter里。打开相应的链接看看。 总体来讲，可以认为审稿人对楼主的工作基本持否定的态度，因此在此期刊发表的前景比较不乐观，建议先修改后再短时间内观察看看，不行立即他投。 |
6楼2014-04-18 20:13:17
|
赞 [ 发自小木虫客户端 ] |
7楼2014-04-18 20:17:46
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
8楼2014-04-18 22:02:59
LuPeng5366
新虫 (著名写手)
牛牛
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 2.5
- 散金: 1512
- 红花: 3
- 帖子: 1562
- 在线: 234.6小时
- 虫号: 738149
- 注册: 2009-04-02
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 原子和分子物理
9楼2014-04-19 12:21:48
20