24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 3488  |  回复: 16
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

95370445

木虫 (小有名气)

[求助] 论文评审有个奇怪的意见 已有8人参与

有个评审人给的意见:
The paper presents a 3-step methodology to obtain ******. The authors are trying to sell this as a "new method". In fact, I would argue that none of the three steps is new, but rather taken from the literature. What is new is the combination of the three steps into a strategy that indeed yields some novelty, and, as the experiments show, also some value. I would caution the authors, however, not to oversell their methodology. It is a neat but rather incremental idea that appears to work relatively well for *** of rather limited extent and complexity. Nothing more, nothing less.

我不太明白的是:用或者整合现有的其他研究方法去实现某个科研目的,这种形式不是也可以成为新方法吗?请教高手应该如何应对?
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

坚持就是胜利
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

jgshuhaihua

木虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
95370445: 金币+8, 有帮助 2014-02-27 10:09:26
改个说法而已。审稿人提了,你就不要纠结了。以前表述是:我们提出了一种***的新方法。现在改成:我们的方法是***
13楼2014-02-26 19:25:14
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 95370445 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见