24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

zhou_buaa

新虫 (初入文坛)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 28.5
帖子: 23
在线: 15.9小时
虫号: 1915735

[交流] 论文投了Applied Thermal Engineering回来的状态时Major Revise 大家给点意见谢谢！

我投的是热电应用仿真方向的文章两个审稿人的意见如下：

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer #1: Dear Author(s),
I have gone through the manuscript. The paper is suitable for the subject area of this journal however the manuscript needs to be revised thoroughly before the publication. The main points for corrections/editing are mentioned as per the following points:
1.    The abstract should be modified by making smaller sentences and including the typical results. The sentence at line 7 of the abstract should be modified e.g. 'The influence level of input parameters are analyzed and the direction……' instead of the larger sentence. At the line 8 of the abstract, use either 'and' between designing and optimization or use design optimization as per the case.
2.    Some (additional) brief information should be provided for the methodology adopted for solving the discretized equations for modeling and simulation.
3.    How the model was validated? Especially when so many assumptions have been taken for the modeling, the validity should be checked properly.
4.    At line 1 of page 6, the sentence should be modified as 'factors limit large scale application of the panel structured heat exchanger TEG.'
5.    Please provide the highlights of the work.
6.    Please check the English grammar, tenses etc. for the whole manuscript and try to improve it.
With regards,
Reviewer no. 1

Reviewer #2: Although there is some problem regarding the writing/organisation and English, the paper presents some novel TEG design and includes valuable numerical analysis for the system performance. The paper can be accepted if the following improvement can be made.

a. have necessary validation to the model.
b. make improvement on English.

请大家看看如何回答比较好尤其是第一个reviewer。按照回答帮助程度散金币！谢谢！

不久前收到录用通知感谢论坛里虫子们的无私帮助！把剩下的金币分给大家！

[ Last edited by zhou_buaa on 2014-4-12 at 16:56 ]

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

球磨粉体时遇到了大的问题，请指教！已经有9人回复
江汉大学解明教授课题组招博士研究生/博士后已经有3人回复

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:

Reject but authors may choose to revise paper，论文状态：Major Revision 已经有7人回复
BT的问题，为什么审稿专家的是minor revise，而系统里编辑给的是 major？？已经有24人回复
投elsevier的Fuel，投稿系统里就显示一个Revise,既不是minor也不是major，why？已经有50人回复
Major revise 和 mandatory revise 那个更严重点？已经有4人回复
论文返回major revise 已经有8人回复

» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

1楼 2014-02-14 14:15:05

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhou_buaa

新虫 (初入文坛)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 28.5
帖子: 23
在线: 15.9小时
虫号: 1915735

引用回帖:

38楼: Originally posted by xiaojiang588 at 2014-03-04 16:56:55
楼主好想问下这个修改后会返给原审稿人还是重新找审稿人啊我的是一个拒一个大修编辑给的大修 f you are able to fully address the comments made, I would be grateful if you could send me a copy of the rev ...

我的和你的一样应该是还会给原来的审稿人但是有一个拒稿的话应该是换一个审稿人共勉！