[½»Á÷] ÂÛÎÄͶÁËApplied Thermal Engineering»ØÀ´µÄ״̬ʱMajor Revise ´ó¼Ò¸øµãÒâ¼û лл£¡

ÎÒͶµÄÊÇÈȵçÓ¦Ó÷ÂÕæ·½ÏòµÄÎÄÕ Á½¸öÉó¸åÈ˵ÄÒâ¼ûÈçÏ£º Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: Dear Author(s), I have gone through the manuscript. The paper is suitable for the subject area of this journal however the manuscript needs to be revised thoroughly before the publication. The main points for corrections/editing are mentioned as per the following points: 1.     The abstract should be modified by making smaller sentences and including the typical results. The sentence at line 7 of the abstract should be modified e.g. 'The influence level of input parameters are analyzed and the direction¡­¡­' instead of the larger sentence. At the line 8 of the abstract, use either 'and' between designing and optimization or use design optimization as per the case. 2.     Some (additional) brief information should be provided for the methodology adopted for solving the discretized equations for modeling and simulation. 3.     How the model was validated? Especially when so many assumptions have been taken for the modeling, the validity should be checked properly. 4.     At line 1 of page 6, the sentence should be modified as 'factors limit large scale application of the panel structured heat exchanger TEG.' 5.     Please provide the highlights of the work. 6.     Please check the English grammar, tenses etc. for the whole manuscript and try to improve it. With regards, Reviewer no. 1 Reviewer #2: Although there is some problem regarding the writing/organisation and English, the paper presents some novel TEG design and includes valuable numerical analysis for the system performance. The paper can be accepted if the following improvement can be made. a. have necessary validation to the model. b. make improvement on English. Çë´ó¼Ò¿´¿´ÈçºÎ»Ø´ð±È½ÏºÃ ÓÈÆäÊǵÚÒ»¸öreviewer¡£°´Õջشð°ïÖú³Ì¶ÈÉ¢½ð±Ò£¡ лл£¡ ²»¾ÃÇ°ÊÕµ½Â¼ÓÃ֪ͨ ¸ÐлÂÛ̳Àï³æ×ÓÃǵÄÎÞ˽°ïÖú£¡°ÑʣϵĽð±Ò·Ö¸ø´ó¼Ò£¡ [ Last edited by zhou_buaa on 2014-4-12 at 16:56 ]

»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥