| 查看: 879 | 回复: 7 | ||
| 本帖产生 1 个 翻译EPI ，点击这里进行查看 | ||
[求助]
翻译求助
|
||
|
In the results section the description of the inhibition studies is not complete. Half of the text presented in that section is devoted to irrelevant background information. The remainder of the text gives only a relatively short presentation to a rather large figure. The rest of the text is adequate but has inconsistent and unorthodox formating and presentation style for each metabolite. The authors also refer to some metabolites as isomers, which is not appropriate just because they have the same m/z. The Methods section ought to have a separate statistics section. The text on lines 130 and 131 (F-test was done a priori) is confusing and misleading. I am assuming the authors meant the F-test was done prior to performing the t-test, in which case that is generally assumed and not necessary to mention (standard procedure). |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
0860004 求调剂 309分
已经有4人回复
-
材料类284调剂
已经有25人回复
-
一志愿211 0703化学 346分求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
考研调剂-材料类-284
已经有17人回复
-
280求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
0703化学求调剂
已经有18人回复
-
调剂
已经有15人回复
-
复试调剂，一志愿郑州大学材料与化工289分
已经有16人回复
-
349学科化学045106求调剂，化学类都可以
已经有7人回复
-
086003调剂求助
已经有6人回复
2楼2014-02-10 12:49:05
wangjun890
至尊木虫 (知名作家)
- 翻译EPI: 3
- 应助: 1067 (博后)
- 金币: 21565.8
- 红花: 36
- 帖子: 6730
- 在线: 552.1小时
- 虫号: 575839
- 注册: 2008-06-19
- 专业: 催化化学
3楼2014-02-10 13:51:06
4楼2014-02-10 14:17:29
5楼2014-02-10 14:21:08
wangjun890
至尊木虫 (知名作家)
- 翻译EPI: 3
- 应助: 1067 (博后)
- 金币: 21565.8
- 红花: 36
- 帖子: 6730
- 在线: 552.1小时
- 虫号: 575839
- 注册: 2008-06-19
- 专业: 催化化学
6楼2014-02-10 19:57:35
RXMCDM
版主 (文坛精英)
- 翻译EPI: 530
- 应助: 401 (硕士)
- 贵宾: 1.908
- 金币: 38947.6
- 散金: 4908
- 红花: 88
- 沙发: 4
- 帖子: 11453
- 在线: 1355.6小时
- 虫号: 2739168
- 注册: 2013-10-20
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 一般管理理论与研究方法论
- 管辖: 论文翻译
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
yunfeng5609(book2005593代发): 金币+10, 楼主要求代发金币10枚~ 2014-02-12 08:40:17
yunfeng5609(book2005593代发): 金币+10, 楼主要求代发金币10枚~ 2014-02-12 08:40:17
|
The Methods section ought to have a separate statistics section. The text on lines 130 and 131 (F-test was done a priori) is confusing and misleading. I am assuming the authors meant the F-test was done prior to performing the t-test, in which case that is generally assumed and not necessary to mention (standard procedure). 方法部分应该有一个单独的统计段。130和131行（F检验前先验算）的文字让人混淆和引起误导。我想作者想说在F-检验前进行t-检验，在此情况下，一般应该想到，没有必要提（标准程序）。 |
7楼2014-02-10 21:03:09
8楼2014-02-11 15:47:21
