| 查看: 823 | 回复: 7 | ||
| 本帖产生 1 个 翻译EPI ，点击这里进行查看 | ||
[求助]
翻译求助
|
||
|
In the results section the description of the inhibition studies is not complete. Half of the text presented in that section is devoted to irrelevant background information. The remainder of the text gives only a relatively short presentation to a rather large figure. The rest of the text is adequate but has inconsistent and unorthodox formating and presentation style for each metabolite. The authors also refer to some metabolites as isomers, which is not appropriate just because they have the same m/z. The Methods section ought to have a separate statistics section. The text on lines 130 and 131 (F-test was done a priori) is confusing and misleading. I am assuming the authors meant the F-test was done prior to performing the t-test, in which case that is generally assumed and not necessary to mention (standard procedure). |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
AI 太可怕了，写基金时，提出想法，直接生成的文字比自己想得深远，还有科学性
已经有9人回复
-
依托企业入选了国家启明计划青年人才。有无高校可以引进的。
已经有11人回复
-
依托企业入选了国家启明计划青年人才。有无高校可以引进的。
已经有10人回复
-
同年申请2项不同项目，第1个项目里不写第2个项目的信息，可以吗
已经有9人回复
-
表哥与省会女结婚，父母去帮带孩子被省会女气回家生重病了
已经有7人回复
-
天津大学招2026.09的博士生，欢迎大家推荐交流（博导是本人）
已经有9人回复
2楼2014-02-10 12:49:05
wangjun890
至尊木虫 (知名作家)
- 翻译EPI: 3
- 应助: 1067 (博后)
- 金币: 21565.8
- 红花: 36
- 帖子: 6730
- 在线: 552.1小时
- 虫号: 575839
- 注册: 2008-06-19
- 专业: 催化化学
3楼2014-02-10 13:51:06
4楼2014-02-10 14:17:29
5楼2014-02-10 14:21:08
wangjun890
至尊木虫 (知名作家)
- 翻译EPI: 3
- 应助: 1067 (博后)
- 金币: 21565.8
- 红花: 36
- 帖子: 6730
- 在线: 552.1小时
- 虫号: 575839
- 注册: 2008-06-19
- 专业: 催化化学
6楼2014-02-10 19:57:35
RXMCDM
版主 (文坛精英)
- 翻译EPI: 530
- 应助: 401 (硕士)
- 贵宾: 1.908
- 金币: 38947.6
- 散金: 4908
- 红花: 88
- 沙发: 4
- 帖子: 11453
- 在线: 1355.6小时
- 虫号: 2739168
- 注册: 2013-10-20
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 一般管理理论与研究方法论
- 管辖: 论文翻译
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
yunfeng5609(book2005593代发): 金币+10, 楼主要求代发金币10枚~ 2014-02-12 08:40:17
yunfeng5609(book2005593代发): 金币+10, 楼主要求代发金币10枚~ 2014-02-12 08:40:17
|
The Methods section ought to have a separate statistics section. The text on lines 130 and 131 (F-test was done a priori) is confusing and misleading. I am assuming the authors meant the F-test was done prior to performing the t-test, in which case that is generally assumed and not necessary to mention (standard procedure). 方法部分应该有一个单独的统计段。130和131行（F检验前先验算）的文字让人混淆和引起误导。我想作者想说在F-检验前进行t-检验，在此情况下，一般应该想到，没有必要提（标准程序）。 |
7楼2014-02-10 21:03:09
8楼2014-02-11 15:47:21