24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 3927  |  回复: 13
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

foolishstar

木虫 (小有名气)

[求助] 收到初审意见了,大家说录用的可能性有多大? 已有5人参与

元旦收到文章的初审意见,有三个评审,有两个人很明确,支持发表,有一个也很明确,反对。原话如下:
1 Reviewer #1: The******** is a quite interesting topic, worth to be addressed in a systematic way.
The paper is well written, the experimental procedure is described (with some missing details as outlined below) and the experimental uncertainties are reported.
As far as the discussion and conclusions are concerned, in my opinion some points have to be clarified as suggested below.
In summary, I consider the paper worth to be published in Applied Thermal Engineering, provided the following amendments are carried out:
(下面是具体修改意见)
2 Reviewer #2: This paper reports ***********. The topic is very interesting. It is recommended that the manuscript be accepted, subject to however a major revision.
(下面是具体修改意见)
3 Reviewer #3: The paper is focused on*******. For this purpose the Authors consider that the proposed new index *****.
However, there are two weaknesses:
1. The innovative part is not clear; what new the article has to add in the ATE?
2. The Author's proposed system is very similar to an existing techno-commercial system.
In particular the Authors do not explain the originality of their approach and of their results with respect to the literature data.
In conclusion the paper is of low scientific quality and neither well presented and organized. Therefore the present manuscript is not suitable for publication in ATE.
(下面没有了)
我感觉第三个人没好好看,因为他说的我的论文的弱点不是我的主要的东西。但是我应该怎么跟他讲呢?
另外,大家说如果按照要求修改了,发表的几率多大?
谢谢
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

南海猪

金虫 (著名写手)

The only one

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
尽最大努力认真修改吧~总不能撤稿吧~楼主加油~早日accept~

[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
出来混,不是你帮我就是我帮你~~~
2楼2014-01-01 16:41:14
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 foolishstar 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见