24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

Lopemann

荣誉版主 (职业作家)

聽真那自由在奏鳴

专家经验: +184
ESEPI: 55
应助: 18 (小学生)
贵宾: 0.779
金币: 1112.7
散金: 2024
红花: 29
沙发: 2
帖子: 4528
在线: 597.3小时
虫号: 1932129
注册: 2012-08-09
专业: 应用数学方法
管辖: English Cafe

[交流] 【activity】Paraphrase practice two

Today our sentences are:
We shouldn't treat this legacy too casually.
He is not sure which decision to make.
It's hard to tell if he helps or drags the leg of Australian politics.

You can choose one of them or all of them to paraphrase. Up to you.

All the paraphrase practice will be put in the folder "English Writing"
Feel free to subscribe it.
http://muchong.com/bbs/taotie.php?action=view&ttid=46562

I will give you guys a sentence or sentences on a regular basis.
Basically these sentences have some deficits and what I expect you guys to do is to eliminate deficits as you can.
You can add more details, you can do some replacements, and you can do anything you want.

As long as you post your version here, I will give you some BBs.
For good translations, I will highlight them. And of course I will post my own version here.

My translation:

This is not a legacy to be treated lightly.

He is tied between two horses walking in different directions, unsure of which rope to cut.

It’s a tough call as to whether he was a builder or a destroyer in progressive Australian politics.

[ Last edited by Lopemann on 2014-2-2 at 06:21 ]

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

职称评审没过，求安慰已经有49人回复
26申博自荐已经有3人回复
A期刊撤稿已经有4人回复
垃圾破二本职称评审标准已经有17人回复
投稿Elsevier的Neoplasia杂志，到最后选publishing options时页面空白，不能完成投稿已经有22人回复
EST投稿状态问题已经有7人回复
毕业后当辅导员了，天天各种学生超烦已经有4人回复
三无产品还有机会吗已经有6人回复

现实世界的理想主义卧底 Gypsy in memory

1楼 2013-12-31 07:54:20

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

Lopemann

荣誉版主 (职业作家)

聽真那自由在奏鳴

专家经验: +184
ESEPI: 55
应助: 18 (小学生)
贵宾: 0.779
金币: 1112.7
散金: 2024
红花: 29
沙发: 2
帖子: 4528
在线: 597.3小时
虫号: 1932129
注册: 2012-08-09
专业: 应用数学方法
管辖: English Cafe

引用回帖:

10楼: Originally posted by polo_he at 2013-12-31 14:27:16
i think the legacy should not give others freely.
when you happen to make a dicision, even small, you should take it seriously.
i am always upset whether it was good for Australian politics or not ...

Mate. it's good that you are willing to give it a go.
I will be picking up your errors now

The first sentence, normally we don't say "we think...not"
we use "we don't think"instead.
In addition, I didn't quite get it when you say "give others freely"
If you are confident with your writing, then paraphrase it. If you are not sure, just leave it there unchanged.
I would say "I don't think this legacy should be treated lightly."

The second sentence, though you changed the meaning of my original sentence, it's ultimate goal to get every sentence error-free. I would say "when you are about to make a decision, no matter how small the decision is, you should treat it seriously."

The third sentence. You didn't get the meaning of "upset"right.
I would say "It's hard for people to tell whether he made a positive or negative contribution in Australian politics progression."

Hope you can come here more often and write more often.
Here is another activity, hope you can benefit from the answer given.
http://muchong.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=6810855&fpage=1

If you like, you can subscribe this type of activities.
http://muchong.com/bbs/taotie.php?action=view&ttid=46562