24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 3351  |  回复: 21
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

einstain666

木虫 (著名写手)

[求助] 第一次投稿,等了一个半月,有了回复意见,不知道这意味着什么? 已有11人参与

只有一个审稿人意见吗?其他的审稿人还会给意见吗?这是大修还是小修?求帮助
Dear Authors,

We have received a referee’s report on the above article, which you have submitted to Special Issue on the 9th Asia Pacific Fusion Association Conference. A copy of the report is attached. The referee has made several suggestions (mandatory) to refine the manuscript. Please make the suggested changes and upload a revised version of article at your earliest convenience. If the revised version of the article is not uploaded until 60 days, the article will be automatically discarded.
Sincerely,

Editor-in-Chief, Special Issue on the 9th Asia Pacific Fusion Association Conference

This manuscript reports one of basic process of optical system in FIR polarimeter/interferometer. Although this process is relatively well known in the field some detail discussion would be informative to the researchers in the field. I found below issues to be checked and corrected before the publication.
(1) Over whole there are many sentences to be revised due to the ambiguity of English expression and typos. I didn’t make list of this since English expert should look at this.
(2) for equation (2): this equation is valid for the one-side concave and the other side flat mirror cavity (hemispherical resonator case), So is this system this case? Or need explain for the validity.
(3) For Equation (11): right hand side (f-z2) seems to be replaced by z2
(4) For Equation (12): right hand side denominator ‘f’ seems to be replaced by ‘z2’
(5) In chapter V ‘Lenses choice’ “…shouldn’t exceed 12.4 mm” need addition explanation.
(6) For Equation (13) parenthesis need to be checked for end part.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

einstain666

木虫 (著名写手)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by terry_well at 2013-12-18 21:47:23
简而言之,这篇会议论文要修改后才能接受,主要是英语语法问题和几个列举的公式的质疑。

邮件上为什么说收到一个a referee’s report,其他审稿人没意见吗?
4楼2013-12-18 21:48:33
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 22 个回答

terry_well

荣誉版主 (知名作家)

笑熬浆糊——满脑浆糊

优秀版主优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖


感谢参与,应助指数 +1
magicb: 金币+1, 我很赞同 2013-12-20 03:51:05
简而言之,这篇会议论文要修改后才能接受,主要是英语语法问题和几个列举的公式的质疑。
签名:英文名“Terry”,EC版专用;中文名“浆糊哥”,灌水专用,谢谢合作!
2楼2013-12-18 21:47:23
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

kaiko2011

金虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖


感谢参与,应助指数 +1
magicb: 金币+1, 我很赞同 2013-12-20 03:51:13
其实这就是变相的小修接受了,改后一定会接受的,估计编辑都不会在发回审稿人手中,不过你还是得仔细的改,认真的回答每一个问题。
5楼2013-12-18 22:06:47
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

einstain666

木虫 (著名写手)


magicb: 金币+1, 其他应该是同意接收,或者编辑认为问题不重要 2013-12-20 03:51:59
引用回帖:
5楼: Originally posted by kaiko2011 at 2013-12-18 22:06:47
其实这就是变相的小修接受了,改后一定会接受的,估计编辑都不会在发回审稿人手中,不过你还是得仔细的改,认真的回答每一个问题。

嗯哪,多谢!我有一个疑问,为什么只有一个人审稿人意见?其他的是拒审还是怎么回事?我也不知道一共是几个审稿人
6楼2013-12-18 22:17:17
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
信息提示
请填处理意见